Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
JetBlue Latest and Greatest >

JetBlue Latest and Greatest

Search

Notices

JetBlue Latest and Greatest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2019, 01:43 AM
  #7571  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Default

Originally Posted by Mattio
It seems like a double standard. Vote Yes (assuming you were a yes voter) for the contract that wasn't quite good enough and then vote No for a pay raise when it becomes abundantly clear that everyone shafted the 190 guys too hard. Or, in other words, Vote Yes to not raise the bar and then vote No because a 190 raise alone doesn't raise the bar high enough......

It's lock-step with the history the airline world has of pulling the ladder up once you get to the top, and also lock-step with the story I heard of Airbus guys thinking 190 guys should have to re-interview before going to the Airbus to make sure they have the "right stuff"
I was actually a no vote but moved over because the contract didn’t do anything for the 190. It was written for the airbus. If the company needs to raise the rates on the 199 they are going to have to do a lot more then raise just the rates on the 190 to make it worthwhile for me. Other people might feel differently but that’s just me. I didn’t see a reason to vote this contract in right before the summer time when we actually had some leverage and I see no reason to help the company training cost wise when it doesn’t help me at all. We get no profit sharing for making this training problem the company put themselves in so why make life easier on them.
hilltopflyer is offline  
Old 01-28-2019, 01:46 AM
  #7572  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy
It’s not pulling the ladder up. It’s called using leverage to make the baseline for everyone better when the company needs something. It’s no different than when the company at AA needed something. APA took that opportunity to gain several items in return for helping the company staff when they messed up. One of the biggest items was receiving an ADG (which was 5:15) instead of their duty period average. Anytime the company needs something is an opportunity to get something in return...and limiting a gain to a small fraction of the pilot group for a dying fleet would be dumb and short sighted. Demanding other areas of the CBA be brought to industry standard in exchange for allowing better 190 rates would benefit all JB pilots and would probably make CBA 2022 easier to negotiate. Of course this is hypothetical...JB trying to increase 190 pay isn’t that likely imo.
Exactly what I was trying to say but much bettter.
hilltopflyer is offline  
Old 01-28-2019, 06:38 AM
  #7573  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 247
Default

Originally Posted by hilltopflyer
I was actually a no vote but moved over because the contract didn’t do anything for the 190. It was written for the airbus. If the company needs to raise the rates on the 199 they are going to have to do a lot more then raise just the rates on the 190 to make it worthwhile for me. Other people might feel differently but that’s just me. I didn’t see a reason to vote this contract in right before the summer time when we actually had some leverage and I see no reason to help the company training cost wise when it doesn’t help me at all. We get no profit sharing for making this training problem the company put themselves in so why make life easier on them.
Ok, I had a 74% chance of being right ;-) and I'm not adamant enough on this forum to keep track of where guys stood on the contract... In the end, it's always the bottom line for this company. They might fix their training problem by outsourcing, buying more sims, hiring more instructors etc. If it's cheaper for them to raise 190 pay, they may do it. If you try to get them to bundle things with a 190 pay raise, it may not be cheaper any more or they may not be able to raise the 190 pay enough to get guys to stay on it and, thus, they wouldn't do it. I can see both sides of the argument when guys do or don't care what affect their contract vote has on the rest of the industry, however, if you have a chance to let guys in your own pilot group grab a bigger slice of the pie then that helps the whole group. At the next negotiations, all those slices of pie will be on the table and we SHOULD get to keep them, albeit divied up differently based on what we want as a group then. Not to mention we would probably be year into this CBA minimum before any 190 raise and you push it back with negotiations, looking for more then we just keep getting closer to the next CBA. (I was a No voter too but I don't see the upside of turning down a juicy raise for the 190.) Also, I have been here long enough to know that the 190's aren't going anywhere anytime soon. Things are going to happen slow and get delayed as usual. We'll check back in 2030 ;-)
Mattio is offline  
Old 01-28-2019, 07:21 AM
  #7574  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,013
Default

Originally Posted by Mattio
It's lock-step with the history the airline world has of pulling the ladder up once you get to the top, and also lock-step with the story I heard of Airbus guys thinking 190 guys should have to re-interview before going to the Airbus to make sure they have the "right stuff"
I hope this isn’t true, but I’m sure there’s one idiot out there that thinks that. I’m sure the failure rate is higher for guys transitioning from the Airbus to the 190 anyway. I guess I better brush up on my TMAAT questions if I want to fly with the big boys one day.
nuball5 is offline  
Old 01-28-2019, 07:37 AM
  #7575  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 247
Default

Originally Posted by nuball5
I hope this isn’t true, but I’m sure there’s one idiot out there that thinks that. I’m sure the failure rate is higher for guys transitioning from the Airbus to the 190 anyway. I guess I better brush up on my TMAAT questions if I want to fly with the big boys one day.
Ya, I think it was just one or two crackpots but I've also heard of Airbus guys treating 190 guys differently, saying "JetBlue Express" etc. From talking to guys that previously worked at other major airlines, that wasn't the case with the culture there. Smaller planes are often more challenging to fly with lower levels of automation etc. The crazy range of pay scales never made sense to me. Wish you could just fly the plane that had the type of flying, schedules, and piloting experience that you want and the money wasn't a factor in the decision. I know that's not going to happen but if you compare the gross weights of the 747 and 717 and then look at the payscales we have a relatively much larger pay reduction going from the A320 to E190 (based on ratio of GW change to change in pay). Things are heading in the wrong direction IMO

Last edited by Mattio; 01-28-2019 at 08:04 AM.
Mattio is offline  
Old 01-28-2019, 08:05 AM
  #7576  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,691
Default

After having flown both planes I can say the 190 guys are self-deprecating and use the “JetBlue Express” joke much more than the 320 guys. I was guilty as well, but it was all in fun. Believe me, the 320 guys have lots of their own problems to make fun of! Drastic difference in crews
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 01-28-2019, 08:10 AM
  #7577  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 22
Default

Originally Posted by Mattio
Ok, I had a 74% chance of being right ;-) and I'm not adamant enough on this forum to keep track of where guys stood on the contract... In the end, it's always the bottom line for this company. They might fix their training problem by outsourcing, buying more sims, hiring more instructors etc. If it's cheaper for them to raise 190 pay, they may do it. If you try to get them to bundle things with a 190 pay raise, it may not be cheaper any more or they may not be able to raise the 190 pay enough to get guys to stay on it and, thus, they wouldn't do it. I can see both sides of the argument when guys do or don't care what affect their contract vote has on the rest of the industry, however, if you have a chance to let guys in your own pilot group grab a bigger slice of the pie then that helps the whole group. At the next negotiations, all those slices of pie will be on the table and we SHOULD get to keep them, albeit divied up differently based on what we want as a group then. Not to mention we would probably be year into this CBA minimum before any 190 raise and you push it back with negotiations, looking for more then we just keep getting closer to the next CBA. (I was a No voter too but I don't see the upside of turning down a juicy raise for the 190.) Also, I have been here long enough to know that the 190's aren't going anywhere anytime soon. Things are going to happen slow and get delayed as usual. We'll check back in 2030 ;-)
It seems silly to vote no to me also. One thing people seem to forget is that there will be another round of negotiations. In this market I have seen the best negotiating enviroment of my career. Who knows if that will continue through the next contract. If the 190 doesn't go away before the next contract the current rates are what you are negotiationg off of. Wouldn't it be better if you were negotiating from a higher hourly rate? If Delta A320 rates were $500/hr JBLU would be getting at least $400/hr. You are only as strong as your weakest link. IMHO you should negotiate hard for the bottom rates in hopes that they drive up the top rates.
leavemealone is offline  
Old 01-28-2019, 09:11 AM
  #7578  
Moderator
 
usmc-sgt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,971
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
After having flown both planes I can say the 190 guys are self-deprecating and use the “JetBlue Express” joke much more than the 320 guys. I was guilty as well, but it was all in fun. Believe me, the 320 guys have lots of their own problems to make fun of! Drastic difference in crews
Heard it all the time on the Embraer. Not once on the Airbus.
usmc-sgt is offline  
Old 01-28-2019, 09:17 AM
  #7579  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 247
Default

Originally Posted by usmc-sgt
Heard it all the time on the Embraer. Not once on the Airbus.
That's good to hear. I'm just going off what other people have told me but haven't been on the receiving end personally
Mattio is offline  
Old 01-28-2019, 09:28 AM
  #7580  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dontsurf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: A220 CA
Posts: 608
Default

Originally Posted by usmc-sgt
Heard it all the time on the Embraer. Not once on the Airbus.
yeah, i have only ever heard 190 guys saying those types of things. we airbus guys actually forget that the 190 guys exist most of the time. just kidding!
dontsurf is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoomie
Major
36
01-28-2015 12:44 PM
iahflyr
Major
27
09-30-2014 10:04 AM
Mason32
Regional
270
07-27-2010 07:01 PM
Scott34567
Regional
39
05-29-2008 08:08 PM
Sir James
Major
0
07-29-2005 08:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices