JetBlue Latest and Greatest
#7571
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
It seems like a double standard. Vote Yes (assuming you were a yes voter) for the contract that wasn't quite good enough and then vote No for a pay raise when it becomes abundantly clear that everyone shafted the 190 guys too hard. Or, in other words, Vote Yes to not raise the bar and then vote No because a 190 raise alone doesn't raise the bar high enough......
It's lock-step with the history the airline world has of pulling the ladder up once you get to the top, and also lock-step with the story I heard of Airbus guys thinking 190 guys should have to re-interview before going to the Airbus to make sure they have the "right stuff"
It's lock-step with the history the airline world has of pulling the ladder up once you get to the top, and also lock-step with the story I heard of Airbus guys thinking 190 guys should have to re-interview before going to the Airbus to make sure they have the "right stuff"
#7572
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
It’s not pulling the ladder up. It’s called using leverage to make the baseline for everyone better when the company needs something. It’s no different than when the company at AA needed something. APA took that opportunity to gain several items in return for helping the company staff when they messed up. One of the biggest items was receiving an ADG (which was 5:15) instead of their duty period average. Anytime the company needs something is an opportunity to get something in return...and limiting a gain to a small fraction of the pilot group for a dying fleet would be dumb and short sighted. Demanding other areas of the CBA be brought to industry standard in exchange for allowing better 190 rates would benefit all JB pilots and would probably make CBA 2022 easier to negotiate. Of course this is hypothetical...JB trying to increase 190 pay isn’t that likely imo.
#7573
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 247
I was actually a no vote but moved over because the contract didn’t do anything for the 190. It was written for the airbus. If the company needs to raise the rates on the 199 they are going to have to do a lot more then raise just the rates on the 190 to make it worthwhile for me. Other people might feel differently but that’s just me. I didn’t see a reason to vote this contract in right before the summer time when we actually had some leverage and I see no reason to help the company training cost wise when it doesn’t help me at all. We get no profit sharing for making this training problem the company put themselves in so why make life easier on them.
#7574
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,013
It's lock-step with the history the airline world has of pulling the ladder up once you get to the top, and also lock-step with the story I heard of Airbus guys thinking 190 guys should have to re-interview before going to the Airbus to make sure they have the "right stuff"
#7575
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 247
Ya, I think it was just one or two crackpots but I've also heard of Airbus guys treating 190 guys differently, saying "JetBlue Express" etc. From talking to guys that previously worked at other major airlines, that wasn't the case with the culture there. Smaller planes are often more challenging to fly with lower levels of automation etc. The crazy range of pay scales never made sense to me. Wish you could just fly the plane that had the type of flying, schedules, and piloting experience that you want and the money wasn't a factor in the decision. I know that's not going to happen but if you compare the gross weights of the 747 and 717 and then look at the payscales we have a relatively much larger pay reduction going from the A320 to E190 (based on ratio of GW change to change in pay). Things are heading in the wrong direction IMO
Last edited by Mattio; 01-28-2019 at 08:04 AM.
#7576
After having flown both planes I can say the 190 guys are self-deprecating and use the “JetBlue Express” joke much more than the 320 guys. I was guilty as well, but it was all in fun. Believe me, the 320 guys have lots of their own problems to make fun of! Drastic difference in crews
#7577
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 22
Ok, I had a 74% chance of being right ;-) and I'm not adamant enough on this forum to keep track of where guys stood on the contract... In the end, it's always the bottom line for this company. They might fix their training problem by outsourcing, buying more sims, hiring more instructors etc. If it's cheaper for them to raise 190 pay, they may do it. If you try to get them to bundle things with a 190 pay raise, it may not be cheaper any more or they may not be able to raise the 190 pay enough to get guys to stay on it and, thus, they wouldn't do it. I can see both sides of the argument when guys do or don't care what affect their contract vote has on the rest of the industry, however, if you have a chance to let guys in your own pilot group grab a bigger slice of the pie then that helps the whole group. At the next negotiations, all those slices of pie will be on the table and we SHOULD get to keep them, albeit divied up differently based on what we want as a group then. Not to mention we would probably be year into this CBA minimum before any 190 raise and you push it back with negotiations, looking for more then we just keep getting closer to the next CBA. (I was a No voter too but I don't see the upside of turning down a juicy raise for the 190.) Also, I have been here long enough to know that the 190's aren't going anywhere anytime soon. Things are going to happen slow and get delayed as usual. We'll check back in 2030 ;-)
#7578
After having flown both planes I can say the 190 guys are self-deprecating and use the “JetBlue Express” joke much more than the 320 guys. I was guilty as well, but it was all in fun. Believe me, the 320 guys have lots of their own problems to make fun of! Drastic difference in crews
#7580
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post