JetBlue Latest and Greatest
#6892
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
On both accounts, no investment, no risk. Just codesharing for low-cost, low-risk revenue.
#6893
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Okay then argue THAT. But what BD and now you are saying is that B6 owes it to us to get approved for ETOPS and thats nuts.
If approved, do you think robin will go for the 99 or the 1?
Do you understand this point on codeshares Hill?
Im trying to paint this as simple as possible. Dont know why you'd hitch your wagon to BD?!
If approved, do you think robin will go for the 99 or the 1?
Do you understand this point on codeshares Hill?
Im trying to paint this as simple as possible. Dont know why you'd hitch your wagon to BD?!
Well, THEY CAN but DON'T.
#6895
Robin has had the ability to serve Hawaii and Keflavik with very little investment for years. He has had the ability to serve Europe for YEARS also, but that would have required an investment equal to every other transatlantic operating airliner.
On both accounts, no investment, no risk. Just codesharing for low-cost, low-risk revenue.
On both accounts, no investment, no risk. Just codesharing for low-cost, low-risk revenue.
Yea, id like that too.
And would you agree that IF he does, that he'll probably take the big money?
#6896
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
#6897
I said when they develop the ability (ETOPS), then yes, they will.
You're arguing that they shouldve developed the ability already.
2 different arguments BD. And I suspect you know this because your point on codeshares blew up- so nice sidestep.
Tell me that you see the difference in the 2.
What a waste of time- sorry guys.
#6898
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: B6
Posts: 1,047
Man you are tight with management. Makes me nervous being on this board and you tell him others things to his face. Blue in your avatar and apparently an open relationship with management.....what else have you talked about?
#6900
Scope is not there to prevent codesharing, its to prevent fee for departures.
Now this TA limits codesharing but actually prohibits fee for departure.
You know the difference right POG?
Now if you want to talk about profit sharing and pay, we can, just tell me that you know the difference between FFD and Codeshare and then you'll understand the need for Scope.
I know this is complicated, but we can take each section at a time.
Fair enough? Or do you just want to vent?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post