Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
JetBlue Latest and Greatest >

JetBlue Latest and Greatest

Search

Notices

JetBlue Latest and Greatest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2017, 09:34 AM
  #4361  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by Cloud5urfer
There seems to be confusion on what "privatization" means as it is currently being proposed. As a not-for-profit, with user fees (mainly paid by airlines) ATC will have an actual steady stream of income to plan for system upgrades. They currently operate under the whim of Congress and their funding which isn't consistent from year to year.

The implementation of next-gen has taken much to longer than it should have under the current system. Aircraft are required to have ADS-B but not all ATC facilities have the equipment for it. That allows for tighter separation which provides greater capacity.

Implementation of Data Comm is another example. Slow to be implemented that allows greater capacity.
Decreasing separation will result in what? More planes to arrive at 13L in JFK? At 22 in Laguardia? As has been pointed out, this is a runway issue. Can't put 2 airplanes on the runway at the same time. And there's Wake turbulence. We're 'closely separated ' enough already.

Also, CPDLC in Oceanic is awesome. As far as picking up the clearance at a domestic airport, I could care less. PDC is almost easier.
Bigapplepilot is offline  
Old 10-07-2017, 09:38 AM
  #4362  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by IQuitEagle
I have to laugh at this, because in true JeBue style, I received one...and I no longer work there!
That is hilarious. Does anyone have an email or contact info to inquire about this?
Bigapplepilot is offline  
Old 10-07-2017, 10:00 AM
  #4363  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Default

Originally Posted by Bigapplepilot
That is hilarious. Does anyone have an email or contact info to inquire about this?
Or just wear the bomber jacket, or north Face since they hate the bomber jacket. Is it your responsibility to make sure the highly trained professionals we work with do their job properly?
hilltopflyer is offline  
Old 10-07-2017, 01:05 PM
  #4364  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Posts: 3,150
Default

Originally Posted by Bigapplepilot
That is hilarious. Does anyone have an email or contact info to inquire about this?
Hey debited your uniform account for it likely before you left. It’s yours.
CaptCoolHand is offline  
Old 10-07-2017, 05:58 PM
  #4365  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cloud5urfer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Position: 320 FO
Posts: 143
Default

Originally Posted by Bigapplepilot
Decreasing separation will result in what? More planes to arrive at 13L in JFK? At 22 in Laguardia? As has been pointed out, this is a runway issue. Can't put 2 airplanes on the runway at the same time. And there's Wake turbulence. We're 'closely separated ' enough already.

Also, CPDLC in Oceanic is awesome. As far as picking up the clearance at a domestic airport, I could care less. PDC is almost easier.
CPDLC can also be used enroute domestically and for taxi clearances if it ever gets implemented. Trying for 30 minutes on the ramp in Kennedy to get a word in is frustrating and inefficient.
Cloud5urfer is offline  
Old 10-07-2017, 08:50 PM
  #4366  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand
Hey debited your uniform account for it likely before you left. It’s yours.
I'm still at Jetblue!
Bigapplepilot is offline  
Old 10-08-2017, 09:27 AM
  #4367  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Default

Originally Posted by Cloud5urfer
There seems to be confusion on what "privatization" means as it is currently being proposed. As a not-for-profit, with user fees (mainly paid by airlines) ATC will have an actual steady stream of income to plan for system upgrades. They currently operate under the whim of Congress and their funding which isn't consistent from year to year.

The implementation of next-gen has taken much to longer than it should have under the current system. Aircraft are required to have ADS-B but not all ATC facilities have the equipment for it. That allows for tighter separation which provides greater capacity.

Implementation of Data Comm is another example. Slow to be implemented that allows greater capacity.
First off, privatization only helps if there is constant competition. Otherwise you end up with a state sanctioned monopoly. I would argue you would get a worse product.

Secondly, there needs to be a carve out for GA. Planes smaller than XXXlbs shouldn't pay fees, or we will see the end of GA in this country.
PasserOGas is offline  
Old 10-08-2017, 10:38 AM
  #4368  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Default

Originally Posted by PasserOGas
First off, privatization only helps if there is constant competition. Otherwise you end up with a state sanctioned monopoly. I would argue you would get a worse product.

Secondly, there needs to be a carve out for GA. Planes smaller than XXXlbs shouldn't pay fees, or we will see the end of GA in this country.
I agree completely with GA. We either get your situation or no one files a flight plan.
hilltopflyer is offline  
Old 10-09-2017, 01:41 PM
  #4369  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 917
Default

Found this data interesting and supports what I've been saying to folks about LGB and how we should dump it/cut back/or move operations to another CA airport and how we keep flying half empty Airbus planes up/down the coast when ww could be entering or expanding into other markets

DOT data for Q1 2017

nsmiles Market B6 fare Avg LF%
236 LASLGB $100 76
372 LGBOAK $98 70
372 LGBSFO $98 68
372 LGBSJC $94 59
404 LGBSMF $113 81
415 LGBRNO $105 88
590 LGBSLC $114 79
859 LGBPDX $98 91
978 LGBSEA $112 93
1242 AUSLGB $177 91
2510 LGBJFK $232 80
2611 BOSLGB $233 80
capt707 is offline  
Old 10-10-2017, 05:25 AM
  #4370  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,659
Default

Originally Posted by capt707
Found this data interesting and supports what I've been saying to folks about LGB and how we should dump it/cut back/or move operations to another CA airport and how we keep flying half empty Airbus planes up/down the coast when ww could be entering or expanding into other markets

DOT data for Q1 2017

nsmiles Market B6 fare Avg LF%
236 LASLGB $100 76
372 LGBOAK $98 70
372 LGBSFO $98 68
372 LGBSJC $94 59
404 LGBSMF $113 81
415 LGBRNO $105 88
590 LGBSLC $114 79
859 LGBPDX $98 91
978 LGBSEA $112 93
1242 AUSLGB $177 91
2510 LGBJFK $232 80
2611 BOSLGB $233 80
Its hard to get exact yield from fare and LF data, but you are correct. The LGB short haul flying is a drag on the network.

I do think the company will keep doing it until we either merge with AS in 3-5yrs, or somehow get a bunch of gates in LAX or SFO. If we walk away from LGB now then SWA will waltz in and dump 40 flights/day up and down the west coast which will further lock us out of anything significant there.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoomie
Major
36
01-28-2015 11:44 AM
iahflyr
Major
27
09-30-2014 09:04 AM
Mason32
Regional
270
07-27-2010 06:01 PM
Scott34567
Regional
39
05-29-2008 07:08 PM
Sir James
Major
0
07-29-2005 07:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices