Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
JetBlue Latest and Greatest >

JetBlue Latest and Greatest

Search

Notices

JetBlue Latest and Greatest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2016, 03:48 AM
  #1951  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Posts: 3,150
Default

Originally Posted by likeitis
An impossible chore for negotiators to prove much of an increase without the company wanting something in exchange. Now if you can give the NMB(because that's where we will be soon) evidence that the rates aren't in line with our peers they will listen. It's just the fact is there isn't evidence to prove that.
You're incorrect.

Remove the EMB from the front of the 190 and put a B or an A or F in front of it and we're behind.

Do not sell yourself short because the name of the plane has "RJ" in it.

Category, of aircraft, not name.

Also wouldn't argue DAL rates... They didn't waste time on them because they aren't getting them. You can take it to the bank, if the DAL pilots were getting the 190 that pay would have been substantially higher.
CaptCoolHand is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 04:11 AM
  #1952  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 79
Default

Originally Posted by capt707
We need a seperate vacation and sick bank and accrual.
"We" don't need it. You'd prefer it that way. I see things differently. I love the freedom and flexibility of the PTO system. That's not to say we don't need improvements to it. If our total PTO accrual equals DAL/UAL/AA's combined sick and vacation AND we had a similar vacation distribution spread and vacation bidding system, what difference would it make?
Chrisx2 is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 04:28 AM
  #1953  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,122
Default

Originally Posted by Chrisx2
"We" don't need it. You'd prefer it that way. I see things differently. I love the freedom and flexibility of the PTO system. That's not to say we don't need improvements to it. If our total PTO accrual equals DAL/UAL/AA's combined sick and vacation AND we had a similar vacation distribution spread and vacation bidding system, what difference would it make?
Um no. Anything less that a separate sick bank gets a no vote.
aldonite7667 is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 04:43 AM
  #1954  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 79
Default

Originally Posted by aldonite7667
Um no. Anything less that a separate sick bank gets a no vote.
Good for you. As a dues paying ALPA member you're entitled to voting whichever way you desire. Thanks for your contribution to the discussion.
Chrisx2 is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 05:04 AM
  #1955  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,122
Default

Originally Posted by Chrisx2
Good for you. As a dues paying ALPA member you're entitled to voting whichever way you desire. Thanks for your contribution to the discussion.
Without one pilots work sick so they don't burn their vacation time or pto to sell. We need an equivalent of 2 four day trips as sick time. I like our current system too but it's an old system and it needs to be enhanced not only with a larger PTO allotment but the ability for guys to actually get sick and have a life. we shouldn't have the give up one with out the other. This isn't 2004.
aldonite7667 is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 05:24 AM
  #1956  
What’s it doing now?
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 190CA
Posts: 726
Default

Originally Posted by capt707
We need a seperate vacation and sick bank and accrual.
No.


Filler
Tom a Hawk is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 05:28 AM
  #1957  
What’s it doing now?
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 190CA
Posts: 726
Default

Originally Posted by aldonite7667
Without one pilots work sick so they don't burn their vacation time or pto to sell. We need an equivalent of 2 four day trips as sick time. I like our current system too but it's an old system and it needs to be enhanced not only with a larger PTO allotment but the ability for guys to actually get sick and have a life. we shouldn't have the give up one with out the other. This isn't 2004.
I'm not interested in my NC wasting negotiating capital on a benefit that I may not use. Instead that sick time could stay in the pot bank and I could use it for more time off or pay when I don't get sick.
Tom a Hawk is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 06:46 AM
  #1958  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 523
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand
You're incorrect.

Remove the EMB from the front of the 190 and put a B or an A or F in front of it and we're behind.

Do not sell yourself short because the name of the plane has "RJ" in it.

Category, of aircraft, not name.

Also wouldn't argue DAL rates... They didn't waste time on them because they aren't getting them. You can take it to the bank, if the DAL pilots were getting the 190 that pay would have been substantially higher.
Usually I would agree but setting the standard for pay rates on an aircraft on initial contract would be nearly impossible.
likeitis is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 07:03 AM
  #1959  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 591
Default

Originally Posted by Chrisx2
If our total PTO accrual equals DAL/UAL/AA's combined sick and vacation AND we had a similar vacation distribution spread and vacation bidding system, what difference would it make?
DAL system for a 10 year pilots 265 hour of PTS plus a PTV bank.

Both granted not accrued.

Sound about right for us.
BlueJetDork is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 07:07 AM
  #1960  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 591
Default

Originally Posted by Tom a Hawk
... or pay when I don't get sick.
Market Pay = Base Pay + Selling PTO.

Cool now everyone has lower than market base pay.

Nice work!

Only in BlueJet world does selling PTO count and not count at the same time.

Using DAL numbers and 'when I don't get sick' equals about $72,000 of additional compensation that will not have to exist in order to not affect base pay rates. But $72,000 does exist. So, someone thinks $265 a hour is doable AND selling PTO when they don't get sick which the company and a mediator will quickly state "Hey NC you want a $340 hour effective base rate" and that fight some on this board think IS NOT a waste of NC capital to engage in.

We are doomed!

Last edited by BlueJetDork; 11-30-2016 at 07:25 AM.
BlueJetDork is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoomie
Major
36
01-28-2015 11:44 AM
iahflyr
Major
27
09-30-2014 09:04 AM
Mason32
Regional
270
07-27-2010 06:01 PM
Scott34567
Regional
39
05-29-2008 07:08 PM
Sir James
Major
0
07-29-2005 07:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices