JetBlue Latest and Greatest
09-20-2016, 10:02 AM
#1061
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Posts: 3,150
I think the issue with displacement has less to do with the FSM and more to do with the PEA and how it's worded. There isn't any way to displace someone out of a base per the language or lack there of in the old PEAs.
They could probably get away with shrinking a base, but closing it all together is out until we have a CBA with actual displacement language. Nothing is stopping them from opening up a new base... but you'd still have to staff it. Then the problem lies in if say you shrink one by ~50 but only ~20 bid out. Now you're well overstaffed on one end and have to train for the other.
That's the way it was explained to me.
They could probably get away with shrinking a base, but closing it all together is out until we have a CBA with actual displacement language. Nothing is stopping them from opening up a new base... but you'd still have to staff it. Then the problem lies in if say you shrink one by ~50 but only ~20 bid out. Now you're well overstaffed on one end and have to train for the other.
That's the way it was explained to me.
09-20-2016, 10:05 AM
#1062
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Posts: 3,150
09-20-2016, 10:28 AM
#1063
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,556
I don't think they would have any issues getting enough guys to willingly transfer from JFK to FLL. Especially if it's combined with the typical Airbus upgrades too.
Just look how many guys bid out of that category on the last bid.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just look how many guys bid out of that category on the last bid.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
09-20-2016, 10:32 AM
#1064
SDQ Base Chief
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,691
I don't think they would have any issues getting enough guys to willingly transfer from JFK to FLL. Especially if it's combined with the typical Airbus upgrades too.
Just look how many guys bid out of that category on the last bid.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just look how many guys bid out of that category on the last bid.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
09-20-2016, 11:09 AM
#1065
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: CA
Posts: 1,232
What's with the string of 5 or so E190 JFK CA awarded (all roughly same seniority) who are all listed as Management?
Are they training center guys who just bid it so they can get the pay bump but don't really fly?
Are they training center guys who just bid it so they can get the pay bump but don't really fly?
09-20-2016, 11:18 AM
#1066
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 79
Basically. They're Captains "on paper". They'll still get paid their 90 hour guarantee at A320 FO rates. Only difference is they can sell their PTO back at CA premium pay and on their fly days (once they've gotten their UOE and fed ride completed) they can fly as CA. Also, on off days, they can RSA/VDA as a CA.
09-20-2016, 11:56 AM
#1067
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 62
Basically. They're Captains "on paper". They'll still get paid their 90 hour guarantee at A320 FO rates. Only difference is they can sell their PTO back at CA premium pay and on their fly days (once they've gotten their UOE and fed ride completed) they can fly as CA. Also, on off days, they can RSA/VDA as a CA.
09-20-2016, 01:14 PM
#1070
facing forward
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: forward facing stick actuator
Posts: 290
Basically. They're Captains "on paper". They'll still get paid their 90 hour guarantee at A320 FO rates. Only difference is they can sell their PTO back at CA premium pay and on their fly days (once they've gotten their UOE and fed ride completed) they can fly as CA. Also, on off days, they can RSA/VDA as a CA.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
