Search

Notices

jetBlue Hiring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2016, 06:09 PM
  #9111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by IH8ROADS
I guess I should have signed it "sarcasm," but there is a bit of truth to it.



I have no problem with the Zero to Hero program, I have friends that fly 777's for British Airways that got hired that way. My sim partner at ASA had 250 hours and he was one of the best FO's I ever flew with. I see one side to the debate and an incapable pilots isn't it. 4000 hard working fraternal buddies want a job and your gonna give it to someone who hasn't been through what I have...

I feel the program will play out well and was executed at the right time. Establish the path and shift it into high gear when we need the feed. In less than 5 years JB is going to have a struggle to fill classes. Leading CBA or not...


I hear you. But the "someone who hasn't been through what I have" argument isn't good enough. So what? Shouldn't we applaud people being able to avoid the crap we had to endure?

The fact is that we still hire 90% of our people through normal means. This is but one path. We should be happy that our company is willing to push the envelope. To grow we need pilots.
Southerner is offline  
Old 10-25-2016, 06:23 PM
  #9112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: Ablue320
Posts: 200
Default

Originally Posted by Southerner
I hear you. But the "someone who hasn't been through what I have" argument isn't good enough. So what? Shouldn't we applaud people being able to avoid the crap we had to endure?

The fact is that we still hire 90% of our people through normal means. This is but one path. We should be happy that our company is willing to push the envelope. To grow we need pilots.
I'm not arguing with the program, I'm saying what the 90% of people who are, argue that point.

I totally agree, I'm for it. I'm envious of the pilots that take the path. When I fly with them I will say, "You suck... well done" and buy them a beer. It's evolving times.
IH8ROADS is offline  
Old 10-25-2016, 06:46 PM
  #9113  
facing forward
 
727_Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: forward facing stick actuator
Posts: 289
Default

You cannot compare the Brittish Airways, Air Lingus, etc Abitio programs to the US ones. They are apples and oranges.

As a BA pilot explained to me, their Ab Initio pilots are tested, already have college degrees and are hired by BA. BA pays them a stipend, pays for their training and housing. The learn the GA flying here in the states and if they get anything less than an A in their classes they are washed out of the program. After getting their commercial here they go back to their respective carrier for additional training and then become an IRO and fly as an IRO for a long time.

The biggest myth out there is there is a pilot shortage. There isn't one. There is a pay shortage. Fix the pay and you will have ample amount of qualified pilots knocking down the door.

The pilot shortage is being bantered about by the RAA and others to try and get the 1500 rule changed so they can go back to lower pay rates.

I am sorry no amount of book work can replace good ole experience. You cannot teach judgment, decision making, hand eye coordination, etc in class room. I cannot even begin to tell you how valuable my CFII days, traffic watch, single pilot IFR piston twins, and other work was before the airlines.
727_Driver is offline  
Old 10-25-2016, 07:55 PM
  #9114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 155
Default

Originally Posted by Southerner
Come on. That BS and you know it. The Gateway Select guys aren't on the list until after their program ends, and they have over 1,500 hours.

What a mountain you guys make out of a molehill. We hired guys at ASA with 250 hours all the time. Some of them are at Blue now. You gonna give them crap for being hired at a 121 carrier with commercial mins?

Bigger fish to fry, fellas, than 20 people taking a different path than you did.
We are not ASA, get over your regional mindset. We should hire the most qualified out of our 4000 applicants. Not guys with no flight time, and not guys with no PIC. If the most qualified don't stick around then that problem needs to be addressed.
WhiteHammer is offline  
Old 10-25-2016, 07:55 PM
  #9115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by 727_Driver
You cannot compare the Brittish Airways, Air Lingus, etc Abitio programs to the US ones. They are apples and oranges.

As a BA pilot explained to me, their Ab Initio pilots are tested, already have college degrees and are hired by BA. BA pays them a stipend, pays for their training and housing. The learn the GA flying here in the states and if they get anything less than an A in their classes they are washed out of the program. After getting their commercial here they go back to their respective carrier for additional training and then become an IRO and fly as an IRO for a long time.

The biggest myth out there is there is a pilot shortage. There isn't one. There is a pay shortage. Fix the pay and you will have ample amount of qualified pilots knocking down the door.

The pilot shortage is being bantered about by the RAA and others to try and get the 1500 rule changed so they can go back to lower pay rates.

I am sorry no amount of book work can replace good ole experience. You cannot teach judgment, decision making, hand eye coordination, etc in class room. I cannot even begin to tell you how valuable my CFII days, traffic watch, single pilot IFR piston twins, and other work was before the airlines.


The math is quite simple. Take the number of new commercial pilots/ATPs yearly, and subtract the number of airline retirees yearly. That giant sucking sound is the shortage in a few short years. Delta may not ever feel the most severe pain, but all airlines will change how they recruit as a result of it. JetBlue will have to adapt, no question. And as an employee of that company, I applaud any efforts to think outside the box to address a real threat to the bottom line. I like my company to be viable, long term.

The propaganda you are spouting sounded good 3-4 years ago. Let's see how it sounds 6 years from now.
Southerner is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 09:22 AM
  #9116  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,918
Default

Originally Posted by 121dj
FYI all B6 pilots get an 8% pay increase 1/1/2017

Sent from my E6883 using Tapatalk
Point. Of. Order. It's not really an increase, they take MOST of that back from you on 2017 profit sharing.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 09:38 AM
  #9117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: CA
Posts: 1,039
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
Point. Of. Order. It's not really an increase, they take MOST of that back from you on 2017 profit sharing.
I agree, but wasn't the profit sharing % until last year pretty low? What's to stop them from giving a low percentage again? The 8% is solid, until it rises with a CBA.
say again is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 09:51 AM
  #9118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Back in right seat
Posts: 208
Default

Originally Posted by say again
I agree, but wasn't the profit sharing % until last year pretty low? What's to stop them from giving a low percentage again? The 8% is solid, until it rises with a CBA.
Yes, if I recall right, it was about 15% last year. Next year with the same profit margin it'd be only 10%. Down by 5%. So stop spouting 8% raise. Whether it's variable or "solid" it's not 8%.

(Next you'll be happy with a TA that takes away all our benefits but has a "nice pay rate increase" - it's not a good TA if it doesn't have both)
IrishNJ is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 10:04 AM
  #9119  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,918
Default

Originally Posted by say again
I agree, but wasn't the profit sharing % until last year pretty low? What's to stop them from giving a low percentage again? The 8% is solid, until it rises with a CBA.
Still some debate about how it all actually works. Here's how im currently seeing it.

Last year was profit sharing worth 20.87% of your eligible income, -5% JB cliff = 15.87% which was paid to us.

Under the new formula, we lose one third of the profit sharing pool, so would have been 13.91% minus the 5% JB cliff, so they would have paid us 8.91% vs 15.87%.

A LOSS of 7%. That's using last year's profit. 2017 and beyond could be more or less.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 10-26-2016, 10:16 AM
  #9120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: CA
Posts: 1,039
Default

Originally Posted by IrishNJ
Yes, if I recall right, it was about 15% last year. Next year with the same profit margin it'd be only 10%. Down by 5%. So stop spouting 8% raise. Whether it's variable or "solid" it's not 8%.

(Next you'll be happy with a TA that takes away all our benefits but has a "nice pay rate increase" - it's not a good TA if it doesn't have both)
Stop putting words into my mouth. You obviously missed what I was asking, and it was a very simple question. NO, I won't be happy with only a pay increase and our benefits disappearing. I'm not a ****ing idiot. Stop letting your emotions take over. I listen to my union, not the blowhards on here when I make up my decision. BTW, by solid I mean not pertaining to profits or PS. Ok.
say again is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Freight Dog
Hiring News
26
08-01-2016 01:48 PM
RiddleEagle18
Major
1
04-21-2011 07:13 AM
tone
Hiring News
139
05-16-2010 09:34 PM
tone
Hiring News
22
04-28-2010 05:20 AM
ryane946
Major
6
02-21-2007 04:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices