Its the worst....
11-18-2006, 10:17 AM
#21
Administrator
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 8,024
Thanks, Mike for a thoughtful response. It's a shame the industry has deteriorated to this level, but many young people continue to be seduced by aviation and will do what is necessary to get to that dream.
Thanks, too, MHM. btw, do you miss Kai Tak? I do.
Thanks, too, MHM. btw, do you miss Kai Tak? I do.
11-18-2006, 10:34 AM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,242
11-18-2006, 11:09 AM
#23
Administrator
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 8,024
Ok, I'll try my hand at your question, LAFF. (Mike and MHM, again correct me if I'm wrong).
The original premise is that JetBlue pays poorly, has poor work rules, etc etc. The pilots are not happy. Some will have enough and leave. If ToiletDuck then applies for the job, he will likely be paid the poor wages which caused the other guy to leave. As long as a company has a supply of eager people willing to take poorly paying jobs, it will have no reason to raise its wages.
The conundrum is what should be done about this, if anything can be done at all.
The original premise is that JetBlue pays poorly, has poor work rules, etc etc. The pilots are not happy. Some will have enough and leave. If ToiletDuck then applies for the job, he will likely be paid the poor wages which caused the other guy to leave. As long as a company has a supply of eager people willing to take poorly paying jobs, it will have no reason to raise its wages.
The conundrum is what should be done about this, if anything can be done at all.
11-18-2006, 06:56 PM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 259
Ok, I'll try my hand at your question, LAFF. (Mike and MHM, again correct me if I'm wrong).
The original premise is that JetBlue pays poorly, has poor work rules, etc etc. The pilots are not happy. Some will have enough and leave. If ToiletDuck then applies for the job, he will likely be paid the poor wages which caused the other guy to leave. As long as a company has a supply of eager people willing to take poorly paying jobs, it will have no reason to raise its wages.
The conundrum is what should be done about this, if anything can be done at all.
The original premise is that JetBlue pays poorly, has poor work rules, etc etc. The pilots are not happy. Some will have enough and leave. If ToiletDuck then applies for the job, he will likely be paid the poor wages which caused the other guy to leave. As long as a company has a supply of eager people willing to take poorly paying jobs, it will have no reason to raise its wages.
The conundrum is what should be done about this, if anything can be done at all.
11-19-2006, 05:09 AM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,242
Ok, I'll try my hand at your question, LAFF. (Mike and MHM, again correct me if I'm wrong).
The original premise is that JetBlue pays poorly, has poor work rules, etc etc. The pilots are not happy. Some will have enough and leave. If ToiletDuck then applies for the job, he will likely be paid the poor wages which caused the other guy to leave. As long as a company has a supply of eager people willing to take poorly paying jobs, it will have no reason to raise its wages.
The conundrum is what should be done about this, if anything can be done at all.
The original premise is that JetBlue pays poorly, has poor work rules, etc etc. The pilots are not happy. Some will have enough and leave. If ToiletDuck then applies for the job, he will likely be paid the poor wages which caused the other guy to leave. As long as a company has a supply of eager people willing to take poorly paying jobs, it will have no reason to raise its wages.
The conundrum is what should be done about this, if anything can be done at all.
Thanks...Maybe the original poster will try to explain himself...I don't buy your answer.
-LAFF
11-20-2006, 10:08 AM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Up front
Posts: 396
From past experience as a passenger and at a university that works close with jetBlue, I agree that jetBlue is an airline that is doing its best to survive in this industry, and I have alot of respect for this carrier and their crew members (B6 term for all employees). All airlines go through rough times and this is their time, but they are gonna bounce back, some might not like jetblue but they are doing a great job in all areas, and are expanding in the right direction. Thanks just felt like sharing my part
11-20-2006, 10:38 AM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: C-17 Sim Pilot Inst
Posts: 182
Can pilot's at JB even file a grievance since there is no union? Maybe that could be the main negative point about JB; the feeling that as a pilot, you don't have anyone "in your corner," so to speak.
11-20-2006, 11:45 AM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 737NG CA
Posts: 766
B6 is a cancer on the airline industry.
11-20-2006, 05:27 PM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 259
When you hear someone refer to a crash pad it is usually for crew members who do not live in a base they have to report to. Example, you live in Chicago but you are based in New York. You have to arrive at your base the night before if the trip leaves early. You have to pay for this on your own so you get together with other people that commute to save money by rooming together in a "crash pad", also at times called a "animal house".
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
