Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
Staying or Going... JetBlue edition >

Staying or Going... JetBlue edition

Search

Notices
View Poll Results: Are you leaving JetBlue for another airline?
Yes
32.80%
No
41.80%
Unsure
25.40%
Voters: 189. You may not vote on this poll

Staying or Going... JetBlue edition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-2024, 05:13 AM
  #191  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,667
Default

Originally Posted by RJDriver900
So with how quickly everything has happened with our newest investor what's everyone’s thoughts of how this plays out? Does this changes anyones plans of who was yes I'm staying to now considering bailing?
Capping Icahn’s involvement to 15% is really huge to me. Yes he’s going to be a big thorn in the side of the company, but we won’t be seeing TWA-like results.

ultimately I think he will package us for a merger with another carrier. A lot of our value lies in the BOS/JFK/FLL hub and there will likely be several interested parties. This is something our mgmt team likely resisted over the years out of self-preservation, but it will bring a good payday for Icahn.

I’d stay put for now and see how this plays out. If we start selling off chunks of assets then we can get concerned, but I feel like that’s not very likely now.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 02-17-2024, 05:13 AM
  #192  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,536
Default

Originally Posted by AYLflyer
I'll be honest, my intention was to have a career here. I have seniority and drive to work. There's currently a very real conversation happening in our home about starting over elsewhere.
Same here. After I got my JetBlue phase 2 email a decade ago, I told the family that "Daddy has gone to his last interview and I'm only keeping the suit for funerals."

Now about twice a week we talk about dusting off that suit.
Boomer is offline  
Old 02-17-2024, 05:16 AM
  #193  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
Capping Icahn’s involvement to 15% is really huge to me. Yes he’s going to be a big thorn in the side of the company, but we won’t be seeing TWA-like results.

ultimately I think he will package us for a merger with another carrier. A lot of our value lies in the BOS/JFK/FLL hub and there will likely be several interested parties. This is something our mgmt team likely resisted over the years out of self-preservation, but it will bring a good payday for Icahn.
I hope there isn't a way for him to legally violate the agreement and increase his stake above 15% in the future, or gain control in some other way.

I like the 15% cap, and the two board seats, but hope it isn't the camel-toes nose under the tent.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 02-17-2024, 05:19 AM
  #194  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,667
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
I hope there isn't a way for him to legally violate the agreement and increase his stake above 15% in the future, or gain control in some other way.

I like the 15% cap, and the two board seats, but hope it isn't the camel-toes nose under the tent.
I agree, there is a possibility of other activists getting involved and going along with whatever he wants. At this point I wouldn’t be dusting off the resume if I was beyond the 3-4yr mark here.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 02-17-2024, 06:23 AM
  #195  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 469
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
I agree, there is a possibility of other activists getting involved and going along with whatever he wants. At this point I wouldn’t be dusting off the resume if I was beyond the 3-4yr mark here.
This is my concern. HE is limited to 15%, but others could join in.
PSU Flyer is offline  
Old 02-17-2024, 06:24 AM
  #196  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 74
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
I hope there isn't a way for him to legally violate the agreement and increase his stake above 15% in the future, or gain control in some other way.

I like the 15% cap, and the two board seats, but hope it isn't the camel-toes nose under the tent.
Thats always a possibility as it would only be for him to make promises of how rich he could make the board members and it would go to a vote.
gottagetout is offline  
Old 02-17-2024, 07:04 AM
  #197  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by RJDriver900
So with how quickly everything has happened with our newest investor what's everyones thoughts of how this plays out? Does this changes anyones plans of who was yes I'm staying to now considering bailing?
I'm coming up on 3 years and wanted to retire here after getting hired. This place works well for my family. I'm 50/50 now, finding it hard to make a decision with so many unknowns and viariables (Insert larry david meme). I definitely want to see what is said during the investor presentation in May and hope for some more clarity. Still, even if they paint a pretty future for us its no guarantee of whats to come.

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
Capping Icahn’s involvement to 15% is really huge to me. Yes he’s going to be a big thorn in the side of the company, but we won’t be seeing TWA-like results.

ultimately I think he will package us for a merger with another carrier. A lot of our value lies in the BOS/JFK/FLL hub and there will likely be several interested parties. This is something our mgmt team likely resisted over the years out of self-preservation, but it will bring a good payday for Icahn.

I’d stay put for now and see how this plays out. If we start selling off chunks of assets then we can get concerned, but I feel like that’s not very likely now.
I agree TWA like results seems less likely, and that some kind of merger prep is a possibility. I'm assuming we would also need a new administration, absolutely no overlap or chance of anti-competition arguments, or some kind of plea that if not allowed we'll disappear and thats not good for anyone.
jetpilot87 is offline  
Old 02-17-2024, 08:03 AM
  #198  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Feb 2024
Posts: 20
Default

I genuinely do not understand why so many are jumping to WILD assumptions of a AS/B6/HA merger. Alaska learned their lesson with virgin trying to get rid of all the airbus aircraft. They want a boeing merger. The most logical merger, if any, would still be a new draft of the NK/B6 merger for a third of the price of the original agreement under a new administration. But I think both airlines will go their seperate ways, F9 will purchase spirit, and then after DOJ approval, F9/NK will adjust their business model and they will have the scale to make it work.
loudclouds is offline  
Old 02-17-2024, 09:35 AM
  #199  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,551
Default

Originally Posted by loudclouds
I genuinely do not understand why so many are jumping to WILD assumptions of a AS/B6/HA merger. Alaska learned their lesson with virgin trying to get rid of all the airbus aircraft. They want a boeing merger. The most logical merger, if any, would still be a new draft of the NK/B6 merger for a third of the price of the original agreement under a new administration. But I think both airlines will go their seperate ways, F9 will purchase spirit, and then after DOJ approval, F9/NK will adjust their business model and they will have the scale to make it work.

now more than ever having multiple fleet types makes sense.

NK having 40 airplanes down on average
AK having to park all the max

multiple types is a hedge at this point.
RiddleEagle18 is offline  
Old 02-17-2024, 09:41 AM
  #200  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 369
Default

Originally Posted by jetpilot87


I agree TWA like results seems less likely, and that some kind of merger prep is a possibility. I'm assuming we would also need a new administration, absolutely no overlap or chance of anti-competition arguments, or some kind of plea that if not allowed we'll disappear and thats not good for anyone.
It still blows my mind that the judge/ruling is for "Anti-competitive" when all he did was literally create a mess of 2 airlines, with both airlines possibly being acquired or just gone. Absolutely nuts.
AYLflyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Titan08
Spirit
1935
07-02-2022 09:37 AM
ERJ135
Major
95
02-05-2018 09:14 AM
fireman0174
JetBlue
6
08-24-2006 05:06 PM
LeeFXDWG
JetBlue
16
05-02-2006 08:30 AM
RockBottom
Major
1
04-21-2006 04:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices