In the courtroom.
#861
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2023
Posts: 142
JB pilots dodged a bullet yesterday. Is it better to negotiate a JCBA with a pilot group which has a demonstrated history of making huge advancements in negotiations, or one which needs large leaps just to come up to industry average and is willing to die on a "drop to zero" hill at the expense of important contract items?
#862
For years now myself (and others of course) have said HA is who we should combine forces with. Overnight we get widebodies, they get Atlantic/Western Europe reach and we get more West Coast and Pacific ops. Now? Well, we just gave Spirit half a billion dollars for nothing. I'd rather our money stay inhouse now out of fear of losing even more on acquisition/merger attemps that the government could strike down.
#863
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 363
Arrogance? It's reality.
If a Spirit pilot could choose whether to merge with DL/UA/no one or Frontier/Avelo, which would they prefer? Obviously the merger partner (or lack of one) which gives them a chance at better gains than the alternative.
If a Spirit pilot could choose whether to merge with DL/UA/no one or Frontier/Avelo, which would they prefer? Obviously the merger partner (or lack of one) which gives them a chance at better gains than the alternative.
#864
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 534
It certainly isn't a crazy thought. I'd operate the brands separately, like AS intends to do, and shift all narrowbody flying to the JB certificate (JB opens a HNL 320 base, planes painted in HA colors operated by Jetblue airways) while putting all current and future WB flying on the HA certificate (HA opens a JFK 330 base, planes painted Jetblue operated by Hawaiian Airlines) then I could see a relatively coherent operation. JB LAX/HNL 320 bases would act like a connected system for crews, but the HNL and JFK 330 bases could operate as a stand alone. Traversing vastly different theaters adds rest issues/complexity anyways so it would make sense to keep JFK pilots on the TATL and HNL on the TPAC. Over time you could add LAX and FLL WB bases for those respective crews.
JetBlue + Alaska + Hawaiian, that would be a true major contender to Big 3.
#865
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2024
Posts: 148
Yeah, but are they (HA), really open to other offers? I doubt it, and JetBlue has already gone to a bidding war with Alaska in the past, and lost. It just results in one or the other over paying for HA. The real answer is wait for a new administration and then three way tie up;
JetBlue + Alaska + Hawaiian, that would be a true major contender to Big 3.
JetBlue + Alaska + Hawaiian, that would be a true major contender to Big 3.
personally I think the growth through acquisition idea is done, the board made that clear with Robins departure
#866
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,002
Yea they’re not getting into another merger….unless it’s us being acquired. This whole process has been a gut punch to the company. I highly doubt they’ll appeal the Spirit ruling. They just need to figure out how to turn a profit with who we are. If they can’t do that, we’re fuqed.
#867
Yeah, but are they (HA), really open to other offers? I doubt it, and JetBlue has already gone to a bidding war with Alaska in the past, and lost. It just results in one or the other over paying for HA. The real answer is wait for a new administration and then three way tie up;
JetBlue + Alaska + Hawaiian, that would be a true major contender to Big 3.
JetBlue + Alaska + Hawaiian, that would be a true major contender to Big 3.
#868
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 534
Could be true, but what about a different model like the Lufthansa Group? Three way mutually agreed upon tie-up, where each entity maintains their unique brand?? No acquisition, just an agreed upon merger of the three, that is inked under a pro-business administration post election.
#869
Bluediver the REAL deal
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 373
Could be true, but what about a different model like the Lufthansa Group? Three way mutually agreed upon tie-up, where each entity maintains their unique brand?? No acquisition, just an agreed upon merger of the three, that is inked under a pro-business administration post election.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post