Search

Notices

In the courtroom.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2024, 07:06 AM
  #861  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2023
Posts: 142
Default

Originally Posted by disenchantMINT
JB pilots dodged a bullet yesterday. Is it better to negotiate a JCBA with a pilot group which has a demonstrated history of making huge advancements in negotiations, or one which needs large leaps just to come up to industry average and is willing to die on a "drop to zero" hill at the expense of important contract items?
wow the arrogance here.
Swindler128 is offline  
Old 01-17-2024, 08:40 AM
  #862  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,667
Default

Originally Posted by AYLflyer
For years now myself (and others of course) have said HA is who we should combine forces with. Overnight we get widebodies, they get Atlantic/Western Europe reach and we get more West Coast and Pacific ops. Now? Well, we just gave Spirit half a billion dollars for nothing. I'd rather our money stay inhouse now out of fear of losing even more on acquisition/merger attemps that the government could strike down.
It certainly isn't a crazy thought. I'd operate the brands separately, like AS intends to do, and shift all narrowbody flying to the JB certificate (JB opens a HNL 320 base, planes painted in HA colors operated by Jetblue airways) while putting all current and future WB flying on the HA certificate (HA opens a JFK 330 base, planes painted Jetblue operated by Hawaiian Airlines) then I could see a relatively coherent operation. JB LAX/HNL 320 bases would act like a connected system for crews, but the HNL and JFK 330 bases could operate as a stand alone. Traversing vastly different theaters adds rest issues/complexity anyways so it would make sense to keep JFK pilots on the TATL and HNL on the TPAC. Over time you could add LAX and FLL WB bases for those respective crews.
Flyby1206 is online now  
Old 01-17-2024, 09:03 AM
  #863  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 363
Default

Originally Posted by Swindler128
wow the arrogance here.
Arrogance? It's reality.

If a Spirit pilot could choose whether to merge with DL/UA/no one or Frontier/Avelo, which would they prefer? Obviously the merger partner (or lack of one) which gives them a chance at better gains than the alternative.
disenchantMINT is offline  
Old 01-17-2024, 09:04 AM
  #864  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
It certainly isn't a crazy thought. I'd operate the brands separately, like AS intends to do, and shift all narrowbody flying to the JB certificate (JB opens a HNL 320 base, planes painted in HA colors operated by Jetblue airways) while putting all current and future WB flying on the HA certificate (HA opens a JFK 330 base, planes painted Jetblue operated by Hawaiian Airlines) then I could see a relatively coherent operation. JB LAX/HNL 320 bases would act like a connected system for crews, but the HNL and JFK 330 bases could operate as a stand alone. Traversing vastly different theaters adds rest issues/complexity anyways so it would make sense to keep JFK pilots on the TATL and HNL on the TPAC. Over time you could add LAX and FLL WB bases for those respective crews.
Yeah, but are they (HA), really open to other offers? I doubt it, and JetBlue has already gone to a bidding war with Alaska in the past, and lost. It just results in one or the other over paying for HA. The real answer is wait for a new administration and then three way tie up;
JetBlue + Alaska + Hawaiian, that would be a true major contender to Big 3.
Clear Right is offline  
Old 01-17-2024, 09:19 AM
  #865  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2024
Posts: 148
Default

Originally Posted by Clear Right
Yeah, but are they (HA), really open to other offers? I doubt it, and JetBlue has already gone to a bidding war with Alaska in the past, and lost. It just results in one or the other over paying for HA. The real answer is wait for a new administration and then three way tie up;
JetBlue + Alaska + Hawaiian, that would be a true major contender to Big 3.

personally I think the growth through acquisition idea is done, the board made that clear with Robins departure
Wasntme is offline  
Old 01-17-2024, 09:32 AM
  #866  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,002
Default

Originally Posted by Wasntme
personally I think the growth through acquisition idea is done, the board made that clear with Robins departure
Yea they’re not getting into another merger….unless it’s us being acquired. This whole process has been a gut punch to the company. I highly doubt they’ll appeal the Spirit ruling. They just need to figure out how to turn a profit with who we are. If they can’t do that, we’re fuqed.
Roy Biggins is offline  
Old 01-17-2024, 09:32 AM
  #867  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,667
Default

Originally Posted by Clear Right
Yeah, but are they (HA), really open to other offers? I doubt it, and JetBlue has already gone to a bidding war with Alaska in the past, and lost. It just results in one or the other over paying for HA. The real answer is wait for a new administration and then three way tie up;
JetBlue + Alaska + Hawaiian, that would be a true major contender to Big 3.
Originally Posted by Wasntme
personally I think the growth through acquisition idea is done, the board made that clear with Robins departure
Yes, I think you guys are probably right. If we were concerned about a SLI with ~3500 NK NB pilots then wait til we face 4500 pilots with WB career exectations.
Flyby1206 is online now  
Old 01-17-2024, 09:34 AM
  #868  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by Wasntme
personally I think the growth through acquisition idea is done, the board made that clear with Robins departure
Could be true, but what about a different model like the Lufthansa Group? Three way mutually agreed upon tie-up, where each entity maintains their unique brand?? No acquisition, just an agreed upon merger of the three, that is inked under a pro-business administration post election.
Clear Right is offline  
Old 01-17-2024, 09:38 AM
  #869  
Bluediver the REAL deal
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 373
Default

Originally Posted by Clear Right
Could be true, but what about a different model like the Lufthansa Group? Three way mutually agreed upon tie-up, where each entity maintains their unique brand?? No acquisition, just an agreed upon merger of the three, that is inked under a pro-business administration post election.
Not sure you heard, but the NEA was struck down.
Bluediver is offline  
Old 01-17-2024, 09:40 AM
  #870  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by Bluediver
Not sure you heard, but the NEA was struck down.
True, but again, the hypothetical was under a different, pro-business administration, post election.
Clear Right is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Halon1211
Spirit
287
01-31-2024 05:28 PM
cactiboss
American
3154
06-25-2014 10:54 AM
JetJock16
Major
334
01-25-2010 06:58 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
165
09-01-2006 04:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices