In the courtroom.
#71
That/It/Thang
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,921
I've followed a number of cases and I have to say this administration's DOJ (or FCC, or SEC, or any number of other alphabet agencies) seem to be filled with lawyers with more ideological zeal than actual legal acumen, and they get their tails handed to them fairly regularly.
#73
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
There is just nothing verifiable to back this up. Even those of us trying to follow the trial haven't heard or seen anything about this. I hope it's true, a settlement is literally the best possible outcome, but my fear is he is full of whipped cream and trying to manipulate SAVE stock.
#74
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,001
There is just nothing verifiable to back this up. Even those of us trying to follow the trial haven't heard or seen anything about this. I hope it's true, a settlement is literally the best possible outcome, but my fear is he is full of whipped cream and trying to manipulate SAVE stock.
#75
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 246
There is just nothing verifiable to back this up. Even those of us trying to follow the trial haven't heard or seen anything about this. I hope it's true, a settlement is literally the best possible outcome, but my fear is he is full of whipped cream and trying to manipulate SAVE stock.
#78
Of course he won’t say they have a year to negotiate, he’ll just tell them “Come back in one month…” Twelve times.
#79
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,001
I think he said he’d rule on it by the end of the year, so I would assume he wants to wrap it up. What I don’t know is if JB wins the case outright, do they still have to divest the gates/slots they previously agreed to do. No deal was struck, so now we’re playing for keeps? Idk. The DOJ’s case sure doesn’t look good.
#80
I think he said he’d rule on it by the end of the year, so I would assume he wants to wrap it up. What I don’t know is if JB wins the case outright, do they still have to divest the gates/slots they previously agreed to do. No deal was struck, so now we’re playing for keeps? Idk. The DOJ’s case sure doesn’t look good.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post