Search

Notices

In the courtroom.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-14-2023, 12:54 PM
  #151  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,921
Default

Originally Posted by DrSmacFum
posts like these and the tweets make it hard for me to understand a 50/50 coin toss scoresheet. But thank you!

Doing the lords work with this 1
I dont believe for a second the 50/50 line Cohen said. As I mentioned elsewhere, he is there to gather information for his paying clients, not for free podcast viewers. He is not going to give away what he really thinks for free, to us, thats for the people who pay his bills; so he takes the east route with 50/50, "coin toss" and too early to say who is winning.
CincoDeMayo is offline  
Old 11-14-2023, 01:10 PM
  #152  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2022
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
This might be your first experience with this kind of situation, but your words speak of someone who is ready to handle it and the curveballs this career will throw at you. Your mindset is the exact one youll need to stomach the bad times.
Thank you, sir. I appreciate that.
310god is offline  
Old 11-14-2023, 01:11 PM
  #153  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
Thank you for the report.

Why in the world would the DOJ call competing ULCCs to the stand and basically ask them "Would you have any issues if the largest ULCC were to go away and we divided up some of their profitable slots amongnst you?"

Seems to reaffirm the overridng theory that divestments are the key, they will be filled by ULCCs and quickly, and that the ULCC market is actually oversaturated, too may cheap seats in the market. More stretgth for the merger being approved.
Agree, strange witnesses to call for the Government.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 11-14-2023, 01:15 PM
  #154  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2022
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
I dont believe for a second the 50/50 line Cohen said. As I mentioned elsewhere, he is there to gather information for his paying clients, not for free podcast viewers. He is not going to give away what he really thinks for free, to us, thats for the people who pay his bills; so he takes the east route with 50/50, "coin toss" and too early to say who is winning.
After having watched the video, I find it VERY hard to believe that even he thinks its a 50/50 chance. Everything he said was leaning towards the merger being approved. Even he said the government's arguments have not been used before (finding just one route that overlaps & 1 customer being harmed) and likely would take some serious convincing to create such an important precedent.

Last edited by 310god; 11-14-2023 at 01:34 PM.
310god is offline  
Old 11-14-2023, 01:51 PM
  #155  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,667
Default

Originally Posted by jetpilot87
Good question at 55:00ish - why are the odds still only 50/50 if its seemingly going well for JetBlue. "There has been no testimony to date that refutes that there is a customer that will be hurt by this." Its just not many people, not in many markets.
I think the DOJ is stretching it in thinking 1 hurt customer means the merger should be denied.

I’d expect JB to make the argument that many more customers will be benefitting from this merger via increased options and true competition for the legacy customer dollars.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 11-14-2023, 02:20 PM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
Thank you for the report.

Why in the world would the DOJ call competing ULCCs to the stand and basically ask them "Would you have any issues if the largest ULCC were to go away and we divided up some of their profitable slots amongnst you?"

Seems to reaffirm the overridng theory that divestments are the key, they will be filled by ULCCs and quickly, and that the ULCC market is actually oversaturated, too may cheap seats in the market. More stretgth for the merger being approved.
Those quesions likely came from cross examination by the JBLU lawyers. I don't remember the details. However, the DOJ did step on their schwantz several times during the session. As did the JBLU legal team, but not nearly as bad.

I spoke to two other people present in the courtroom today - one was a former airline blogger (now likely an investor) and the guy that was in the podcast that Bluedriver posted (Michael Cohen of MDC Financial Research). Cohen wouldn't commit to saying JBLU's winning this; still hedging his bets. The other guy initially told me that it leaned slightly toward the merger. After the court recessed for the day, he felt that today was a pretty big win for the merger going through.
Andy is offline  
Old 11-14-2023, 02:45 PM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by DrSmacFum
posts like these and the tweets make it hard for me to understand a 50/50 coin toss scoresheet. But thank you!

Doing the lords work with this 1
Thanks, but everyone on this forum knows I'm a heartless b@zturd.

I went because I had an oversized position in NK that was taking a pretty big haircut. After watching today's session, I doubled my position. Still have a little bit of dry powder left for after turkey day when I return to watch the final arguments.

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
I dont believe for a second the 50/50 line Cohen said. As I mentioned elsewhere, he is there to gather information for his paying clients, not for free podcast viewers. He is not going to give away what he really thinks for free, to us, thats for the people who pay his bills; so he takes the east route with 50/50, "coin toss" and too early to say who is winning.
Agreed; I had the same opinion when I watched the video.

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
Agree, strange witnesses to call for the Government.
They would have been called by the defense anyway so nothing lost by the DOJ.

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
I think the DOJ is stretching it in thinking 1 hurt customer means the merger should be denied.

I’d expect JB to make the argument that many more customers will be benefitting from this merger via increased options and true competition for the legacy customer dollars.
Correct about stretching it. They're trying to establish new case law to make mergers more difficult. The problem here is that the Judge is not someone who has shown an inclination for carving a new path in case law; he's almost certain to follow past precedent. JMO.
Andy is offline  
Old 11-14-2023, 03:06 PM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RemoveB4flght's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 770
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
Thank you for the report.

Why in the world would the DOJ call competing ULCCs to the stand and basically ask them "Would you have any issues if the largest ULCC were to go away and we divided up some of their profitable slots amongnst you?"

Seems to reaffirm the overridng theory that divestments are the key, they will be filled by ULCCs and quickly, and that the ULCC market is actually oversaturated, too may cheap seats in the market. More stretgth for the merger being approved.
The only logical thought train I could see is if the DOJ could argue that those airplanes moved over to the new slots/gates from the 'less profitable routes' would hurt other LCC consumers as they would see a service reduction so that these companies can pick up routes that would otherwise be serviced by NK if the merger was blocked, but I'm just playing Devil's advocate here...
RemoveB4flght is offline  
Old 11-14-2023, 04:58 PM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,013
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
I can see why NK stock popped today and would expect a short covering rally tomorrow, barring any mistakes by the JBLU legal team.

Thanks for the report. I’ll say that the entire airline sector and market in general had a really good day. Spirit’s stock in particular had a really bad end of last week. This is probably just the rebound.
nuball5 is offline  
Old 11-14-2023, 05:23 PM
  #160  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by nuball5
Thanks for the report. I’ll say that the entire airline sector and market in general had a really good day. Spirit’s stock in particular had a really bad end of last week. This is probably just the rebound.
Court was recessed at 1230P EDT. Look at the daily. While the stock was up prior to then, it started climbing after that time.

FYI, unless one is a reporter or lawyer and prescreened for electronic devices, you can't bring any electronics into the courtroom. They have to be checked at the entrance.
Andy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Halon1211
Spirit
287
01-31-2024 05:28 PM
cactiboss
American
3154
06-25-2014 10:54 AM
JetJock16
Major
334
01-25-2010 06:58 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
165
09-01-2006 04:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices