Search

Notices

In the courtroom.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-2024, 06:54 AM
  #1031  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 55
Default

Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
It seems the only way at this merger could be saved is if Spirit could show they had serious solvency issues. Like Chapter 11 was imminent or possibly worse. Aside from that, the Judge made his ruling. Highly unlikely that's getting overturned. Honestly, I'm not sure why Spirit's balance sheet wasn't more of a focus in this trial. They're sinking. The ULCC model is struggling. No guarantee they even exist, let alone keep the ULCC model. They seems like that should have been an area of focus during the trial. Kill the merger...even more people will be harmed. I don't think JB has the greatest attorneys.
Unfortunately it’s too late for that. That’s what will happen when Frontier tries to merge with Spirit next year. There hasn’t been a material change in Spirit’s financial position over the past 2 months. The time to argue that point was during the trial. I agree, they should have pushed that point harder. I think it’s a fine line though, if the merger wasn’t approved Spirit’s management still has a company to run.
Mikeer50 is offline  
Old 01-31-2024, 07:25 AM
  #1032  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,026
Default

Originally Posted by Bgood
Majority is 51%. Did you speak with around 2600 pilots? You can only speak for yourself and the 10 or 15 other pilots you spoke with. You are just hoping majority are against it. Not because you think so means it is so.
It’s called sample size. You don’t need to question everyone.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 01-31-2024, 07:48 AM
  #1033  
Line Holder
 
skitheline's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 47
Default

Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
It seems the only way at this merger could be saved is if Spirit could show they had serious solvency issues. Like Chapter 11 was imminent or possibly worse.
Unfortunately, TC had every chance during his testimony to make this point but chose to, for god knows what reason, say spirit had a path to profitability when there was, in fact, no plan to profitability.
skitheline is offline  
Old 01-31-2024, 08:00 AM
  #1034  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,013
Default

Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
It seems the only way at this merger could be saved is if Spirit could show they had serious solvency issues. Like Chapter 11 was imminent or possibly worse. Aside from that, the Judge made his ruling. Highly unlikely that's getting overturned. Honestly, I'm not sure why Spirit's balance sheet wasn't more of a focus in this trial. They're sinking. The ULCC model is struggling. No guarantee they even exist, let alone keep the ULCC model. They seems like that should have been an area of focus during the trial. Kill the merger...even more people will be harmed. I don't think JB has the greatest attorneys.
Unless you have a background in antitrust law, how do you know they did a poor job? I know pilots know all, but without being present in the courtroom and/or having any legal experience, I don’t know how you can claim that.


If I land firm on rwy 32 in BOS, I don’t expect an antitrust lawyer will critique me. 😂
nuball5 is offline  
Old 01-31-2024, 08:26 AM
  #1035  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 931
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
It’s called sample size. You don’t need to question everyone.
So would you say the few pilots Cindy ran into or text etc, between the ruling and now, is a good sample size? You don't need to question everyone but you need a good mix and count in the sample size to make a conclusion. How many commuters vs living-in-base peeps has he/she asked? What's the mix in the sample? Does living in base automatically means the person is ok with how things are and are against the merger? Again, it's opinion based on what Cindy wants to believe, because he/she is against the merger. It's not fact.

Example. How many times when we have a TA to vote on does pilots come on here saying "It seems like majority of the group is voting no" only for that to be wrong? Maybe the sample size is too small? Maybe folks are not being completely honest? Unless there is official data, we are always talking out of our a$$es.

I'm in base and I wasn't against the merger. Different strokes for different hoes......I mean folks.

Last edited by Bgood; 01-31-2024 at 08:37 AM.
Bgood is offline  
Old 01-31-2024, 09:40 AM
  #1036  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,002
Default

Originally Posted by nuball5
Unless you have a background in antitrust law, how do you know they did a poor job? I know pilots know all, but without being present in the courtroom and/or having any legal experience, I don’t know how you can claim that.


If I land firm on rwy 32 in BOS, I don’t expect an antitrust lawyer will critique me. 😂
is your cousin one of the attorneys? 😂 I'm saying that because they lost. And they had years to prepare the case. They rested their case early thinking they had just slam dunked it. When they did that, I had a bad feeling. Something else that alarmed me: Andy made a post in here saying he suggested one of our attorneys ask a particular question (I forget what question) and the attorney listened to him...taking advice from some random in the courtroom also seemed concerning 😂. As someone said above, when TC got on the stand and said they had a profitable path forward without JB, that did not help the case either. Why they didn't better prepare their case and their witnesses is beyond me, but here we are. This doesn't equate to a hard landing, it equates to not getting to your destination...in which case, a passenger would be well within reason to question your piloting skills.
Roy Biggins is offline  
Old 01-31-2024, 11:34 AM
  #1037  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,013
Default

Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
is your cousin one of the attorneys? 😂 I'm saying that because they lost. And they had years to prepare the case. They rested their case early thinking they had just slam dunked it. When they did that, I had a bad feeling. Something else that alarmed me: Andy made a post in here saying he suggested one of our attorneys ask a particular question (I forget what question) and the attorney listened to him...taking advice from some random in the courtroom also seemed concerning 😂. As someone said above, when TC got on the stand and said they had a profitable path forward without JB, that did not help the case either. Why they didn't better prepare their case and their witnesses is beyond me, but here we are. This doesn't equate to a hard landing, it equates to not getting to your destination...in which case, a passenger would be well within reason to question your piloting skills.
One of the antitrust lawyers “listened” to some random person in the courtroom. Well you got me there. How intently was he listening? A lot? A little? Somewhere in between? Did he write it down?

JetBlue lost because the Judge had a very myopic view of the Clayton Act. It doesn’t mean the JetBlue lawyers did a bad job. Actually most of the rhetoric I heard was how badly the DOJ was performing in court. I started to believe it too. Not enough to load up on SAVE like some pilots did thinking they knew the DOJ had a bad case, but I gave JetBlue a 50/50 shot. Maybe in the end they simply had an uphill climb trying to convince the judge that removing a ULCC from the market was a good idea like many experts thought.
nuball5 is offline  
Old 01-31-2024, 11:56 AM
  #1038  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Posts: 2,931
Default

Originally Posted by nuball5
Unless you have a background in antitrust law, how do you know they did a poor job? I know pilots know all, but without being present in the courtroom and/or having any legal experience, I don’t know how you can claim that.


If I land firm on rwy 32 in BOS, I don’t expect an antitrust lawyer will critique me. 😂
oh sure they do just visit airliners.net ☺️
pilotpayne is offline  
Old 01-31-2024, 12:12 PM
  #1039  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,002
Default

Originally Posted by nuball5
One of the antitrust lawyers “listened” to some random person in the courtroom. Well you got me there. How intently was he listening? A lot? A little? Somewhere in between? Did he write it down?

JetBlue lost because the Judge had a very myopic view of the Clayton Act. It doesn’t mean the JetBlue lawyers did a bad job. Actually most of the rhetoric I heard was how badly the DOJ was performing in court. I started to believe it too. Not enough to load up on SAVE like some pilots did thinking they knew the DOJ had a bad case, but I gave JetBlue a 50/50 shot. Maybe in the end they simply had an uphill climb trying to convince the judge that removing a ULCC from the market was a good idea like many experts thought.
When everyone else was talking about their imminent JCBA, I will say, you were one of the few that had tempered expectations of the looming verdict. Yea I agree, it was a myopic view, but the Clayton Act was on trial. JB couldn't make their case.
Roy Biggins is offline  
Old 01-31-2024, 01:30 PM
  #1040  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,667
Default

Originally Posted by pilotpayne
oh sure they do just visit airliners.net ☺️
Unless you’re a Delter pilot. In that case you’d be considered a hero for miraculously landing on Rwy 32 and you’d chalk it up to your expertise landing on “The Ship” when you used to fly F-teens.

Last edited by Flyby1206; 01-31-2024 at 01:41 PM.
Flyby1206 is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Halon1211
Spirit
287
01-31-2024 05:28 PM
cactiboss
American
3154
06-25-2014 10:54 AM
JetJock16
Major
334
01-25-2010 06:58 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
165
09-01-2006 04:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices