Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
JetBlue bids for Spirit Airlines >

JetBlue bids for Spirit Airlines

Search

Notices

JetBlue bids for Spirit Airlines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2022, 02:54 PM
  #321  
Gets Weekends Off
 
todd1200's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,018
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
What leverage exactly would you say we had?
1.E.2:
”A single collective bargaining agreement will be negotiated by the pilot groups and the Companies subject to the transaction or their Successor. While such negotiations are ongoing and until a Joint Collective Bargaining Agreement is ratified the status quo as specified in the agreement(s) of the impacted pilot group(s) will apply. Each pre-merger carrier shall keep separate flight operations of the carriers and will not transfer or interchange pilots or aircraft between the carriers unless otherwise negotiated and agreed to by the Association, and shall ensure that all Company aircraft on hand or on order at the time of the transaction are operated only by JetBlue Pilots...”

So until the combined groups vote in a JCBA, management will be unable to realize most of the advantages of the merger.

Or we could sign a LOA that provides narrow and specific relief and starts with “Notwithstanding Section 1.E.2..”
todd1200 is offline  
Old 04-11-2022, 02:56 PM
  #322  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,190
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
So... 3%, less scope, a TINY bonus and you have to pay to carry-on your crew luggage?
I mean pilots who will hopefully have a backbone.
SaintNick is offline  
Old 04-11-2022, 05:49 PM
  #323  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 992
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy
1F7/1F8 were pretty large. And our case was pretty good.
We lost our leverage with LOA 13.
BunkerF16 is offline  
Old 04-11-2022, 06:00 PM
  #324  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 429
Default

Originally Posted by SaintNick
I mean pilots who will hopefully have a backbone.
those of us that walked the line do
IWalkJun12 is offline  
Old 04-11-2022, 06:48 PM
  #325  
Covfefe
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
We lost our leverage with LOA 13.
Not really. It failed. You can argue 12 lost leverage. But, the fact that our vote was required for 17 still matters. The only way yes to 17 will have been the right vote is if the NEA goes away, from the DOJ or because of a spirit merger imo. Then we keep the gains and our relief is irrelevant anyway.
BeatNavy is offline  
Old 04-11-2022, 06:59 PM
  #326  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 924
Default

Originally Posted by SaintNick
I mean pilots who will hopefully have a backbone.
Would be nice going forward that when we are talking about no backbone, we call out only the 60%ers, instead of lumping me and the other 40% NO voters in the same no backbone category. The results were not 100% Yes, only 60%.
Bgood is offline  
Old 04-11-2022, 07:37 PM
  #327  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,190
Default

Originally Posted by Bgood
Would be nice going forward that when we are talking about no backbone, we call out only the 60%ers, instead of lumping me and the other 40% NO voters in the same no backbone category. The results were not 100% Yes, only 60%.
yes I am only talking about them. The same who almost voted in loa 13, ck at the helm.
SaintNick is offline  
Old 04-11-2022, 09:10 PM
  #328  
Line holder
 
symbian simian's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: On the bus,seat 0A
Posts: 3,295
Default

Originally Posted by keysersose
Because the three year Spirit guy/gal is, on average, 4 years younger than the 7 year Jetblue guy. That is on average so please don't get into semantics. That ruins the seniority progression of the Jetblue guy/gal. If that Jetblue pilot is 440(10%) on the Jetblue list and nobody younger than him in front, he will retire number one. In comes 300 Spirit(10%) ahead of him. 220 possibly younger.
I feel that one. I got hired at NK just over 8 years ago, about #700, 300 would retire in the next 20 years, making me #400. If hired at AA, I would have started at #14K, and would be at # 500 20 years later, 97% retirements above me. I gambled at the growth for NK, and never got an interview at AA.

Last edited by symbian simian; 04-11-2022 at 09:23 PM.
symbian simian is offline  
Old 04-11-2022, 09:18 PM
  #329  
Line holder
 
symbian simian's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: On the bus,seat 0A
Posts: 3,295
Default

Originally Posted by KNOTAPILOT
Because chasing an upgrade has worked out so well in the past. Also I think my point still stands the hiring minimums are lower in spirit. I’ll all for the working with the Spirit pilots. I’ve met nothing but great people there and from my previous airline they’re all amazing that are there. If it was Alaska I’d say it’s more so a fair comparison and apples to apples regardless if I lost seniority I’d make more sense. I think that’s what happened with Alaska Virgin. Same airline just west coast east coast. I’m just saying it’s not apples to apples. If it was straight relative seniority that’d be heavily inclined the spirit way. If that balance was to swing one way it should be the other way, just as ID expect or understand if it was a legacy merging with JetBlue.
Originally Posted by KNOTAPILOT
YOU didn’t apply. I mean that must be true for the rest too. I think the frontier and spirit merger SLI would have its issues just like any other would but absolutely would be less painful. Regardless if it’s with us once it’s over with you’d realize people are trying to defend their stance but doesn’t mean they aren’t great people. Just like you’d defend a staple doesn’t mean I won’t defend losing years of seniority. Outside that we can have a beer and talk about anything that doesn’t involve planes or work. It’s all relative btw. Let’s not forget how the frontier group treated the republic pilots. Granted there’s been many different faces in frontier since then.
Been with NK since 2013, looked at JB and passed as did all the FOs I have flown with. I am sure you didn't apply to NK, and neither did any of your FOs (captains?). Confirmation bias is real. RS means just that, you don't lose anything as far as your bidding power is concerned. I can see where DOH should be considered as the combined group ages, if one group was substantially younger, but just having someone above you on the list with a later date of hire doesn't mean your life has been adversely affected.
symbian simian is offline  
Old 04-12-2022, 02:19 AM
  #330  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,905
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
Been with NK since 2013, looked at JB and passed as did all the FOs I have flown with. I am sure you didn't apply to NK, and neither did any of your FOs (captains?). Confirmation bias is real. RS means just that, you don't lose anything as far as your bidding power is concerned. I can see where DOH should be considered as the combined group ages, if one group was substantially younger, but just having someone above you on the list with a later date of hire doesn't mean your life has been adversely affected.
It means your future life has been affected. Period. Guys hired after you are statistically younger than you, which harms your *future* QOL/bidding.

Stop trying to convince us otherwise.
Bluedriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
flyou11
Regional
11
07-18-2012 04:53 PM
multipilot
Regional
11
06-15-2008 06:58 PM
RockBottom
Major
4
04-09-2006 04:23 PM
fireman0174
JetBlue
0
04-05-2006 06:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices