Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Hiring News
Virgin America hiring pilots again, 2013 >

Virgin America hiring pilots again, 2013

Search

Notices
Hiring News Latest news and rumors

Virgin America hiring pilots again, 2013

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2013, 10:54 AM
  #111  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by RJtrashPilot
I'm not really sure how stating facts from company provided financial data is "trolling". My statement is not intended as a reflection on VX employees or the product they provide. As I stated earlier, the over saturated market simply does not allow VX to command the premium they need to cover the product they provide. If they can't do that, they don't make money.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 01-22-2013, 11:38 AM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Skeptical
Posts: 378
Default

Originally Posted by RJtrashPilot
I'll believe the results when I see them but we've been told we had a net corporate profit in Q4 2012 and that unless something crazy happens, like out of control fuel prices or global thermonuclear war, that we should be profitable for full year 2013, despite a possible slight loss in Q1 2013.
I'm going to start a new drinking game: you Google the words "David Cush" and "profitable" and then you have to take shot for every quarter that comes up in which Cush counters the announcement of a loss with a claim that they will still be profitable on the year.

Golden Bear is offline  
Old 01-22-2013, 11:41 AM
  #113  
I have shiny jet syndrome
 
RJtrashPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: ELACS, FACs and SECs. Who doesn't love 'em?
Posts: 984
Default

Originally Posted by Golden Bear
I'm going to start a new drinking game: you Google the words "David Cush" and "profitable" and then you have to take shot for every quarter that comes up in which Cush counters the announcement of a loss with a claim that they will still be profitable on the year.

Exactly. Hence I prefaced my comment with "I'll believe the results when I see them..."

Believe me, I'm far, far from a kook-aid drinker. In fact, I tend to be quite the opposite.
RJtrashPilot is offline  
Old 01-22-2013, 01:11 PM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CanoePilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,166
Default

Originally Posted by RJtrashPilot
I think we are about to turn the corner here in terms of actually making money. I'll believe the results when I see them but we've been told we had a net corporate profit in Q4 2012 and that unless something crazy happens, like out of control fuel prices or global thermonuclear war, that we should be profitable for full year 2013, despite a possible slight loss in Q1 2013.

Hopefully it's true. If it's not, I'll be the first one lining up to eat crow.
We've been told that a profit is just around the corner for almost 5 years now. We've also been told all upgrade in 4 years.

Virgin's problem isn't feed it's a bad business model. They are flying on routes where there is already stiff competition. They think people will flock to them because of their ife and mood lighting. Honestly that is not all that great, AA is putting a better ife in their a321 trans-con planes this year and it will have a better first class than VA. So why would anyone fly va if you can get a better product cheaper with more connections.

VA is trying to run a hub and spoke airline out of la and sfo. They think people will fly to sfo to connect and go on to another city. It's a bad model, they should have put a base on the east coast and/or in the central part of the country.

The business travelers don't want to bother with va for this main reason. Unless sfo is their final destination they don't have a use for VA. All va has are leisure travelers and the hipsters.
CanoePilot is offline  
Old 01-22-2013, 02:36 PM
  #115  
I have shiny jet syndrome
 
RJtrashPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: ELACS, FACs and SECs. Who doesn't love 'em?
Posts: 984
Default

RJtrashPilot is offline  
Old 01-22-2013, 03:31 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Default

Originally Posted by RJtrashPilot
The view across the table during your interview?
Columbia is offline  
Old 01-22-2013, 03:33 PM
  #117  
I have shiny jet syndrome
 
RJtrashPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: ELACS, FACs and SECs. Who doesn't love 'em?
Posts: 984
Default

Something like that.
RJtrashPilot is offline  
Old 01-22-2013, 07:07 PM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,938
Default

Originally Posted by CanoePilot
We've been told that a profit is just around the corner for almost 5 years now. We've also been told all upgrade in 4 years.
Upgrade in 4 years? No one told me that. And why would you believe that? I wouldn't trust any timeline for an upgrade unless you are physically and directly hired as a Captain.

Virgin's problem isn't feed it's a bad business model. They are flying on routes where there is already stiff competition. They think people will flock to them because of their ife and mood lighting. Honestly that is not all that great, AA is putting a better ife in their a321 trans-con planes this year and it will have a better first class than VA. So why would anyone fly va if you can get a better product cheaper with more connections.
VX's IFE is still greater than AA's. I haven't seen their new A321s, but we'll see how that plays out. Is AA also getting new FAs? Or will it be grumpy grannies serving all classes? Also, it's worth nothing that VX did offer elite status match for FF programs at United and American, to try and get more people to switch.

VA is trying to run a hub and spoke airline out of la and sfo. They think people will fly to sfo to connect and go on to another city. It's a bad model, they should have put a base on the east coast and/or in the central part of the country.
West coast people can connect through SFO. But you obviously won't go ORD-SFO-JFK, that wouldn't make any sene. VX already has a crew base (ALF) at JFK, albeit, a small one.

The business travelers don't want to bother with va for this main reason. Unless sfo is their final destination they don't have a use for VA. All va has are leisure travelers and the hipsters.
From working at the airline, I have seen lot more than leisure travelers and hipsters. Anytime someone is sitting in first class, they either paid for the first class ticket or they upgraded their main cabin seat by paying money ($299 for transcons) upon checkin. In my experience, I'd say that all 8 FC seats are usualy full. VX does have a niche of people who are willing to pay that extra money for the service provided. VX gained a 4-star rating, making it only the 2nd US airline to achieve that. Do you think AA or anyone else will be in line to get that? The legacies have PO'ed old FAs because everything they have gone through in their 30-40 year career.

VX is what flying was (or used to be) and how it should be. Employees actually happy working there, taking care of the customers, smiling, and having fun. I'd say that is missing altogether at the legacies, for the most part. FAs are the frontline for customer service, and they make or break the passenger's experience.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 01-22-2013, 08:28 PM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
swamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: Delta chihuahua Capt.
Posts: 462
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy

Anytime someone is sitting in first class, they either paid for the first class ticket or they upgraded their main cabin seat by paying money ($299 for transcons) upon checkin.

VX is what flying was (or used to be) and how it should be.
These are two very contradicting statements.... Shy I know YOU truly believe in VX, but do you go home, lay in your bed and HONESTLY believe in VX???? There are many of your ex 9E friends that read this wondering about VX. Your post give them little hope, but don't sell them unicorns and beachfront property in Montana. Best of luck my friend.

Last edited by swamp; 01-22-2013 at 08:44 PM.
swamp is offline  
Old 01-22-2013, 09:20 PM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,938
Default

Originally Posted by swamp
These are two very contradicting statements.... Shy I know YOU truly believe in VX, but do you go home, lay in your bed and HONESTLY believe in VX???? There are many of your ex 9E friends that read this wondering about VX. Your post give them little hope, but don't sell them unicorns and beachfront property in Montana. Best of luck my friend.
How are they contradicting points? They are very accurate points. Believe it or not, there was a time when the only way to get into first class was to pay for a first class ticket, and people actually dressed to fly, both in first and in coach. Back then, FF programs didn't exist and this continued for a while even after FF programs came into existence. Now, people can upgrade into first using their FF program miles or Elite status. At many places, non-revs can travel in first class (some for free).

I'm not selling ANYONE unicorns or beachfront property in Montana. I'll admit there are profitability issues in question for VX. I'm not sure where VX will be in one year, two, three, etc. That having been said, I'd enourage anyone from a regional (especially ones that are shrinking, downgrading, and furloughing) to consider VX. What do you have to lose, especially if you are going to lose your current job? Best case, VX works out and you enjoy your job and stay put. Worst case, get a PIC A320 type rating, time in the bus, and you can apply elsewhere to legacies/LCCs.
ShyGuy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Major
41
03-15-2009 04:35 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
Sr. Barco
Major
34
07-31-2007 01:01 PM
A320fumes
Major
3
03-21-2007 07:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices