Piedmont or ASA
07-13-2006, 04:35 AM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: A320/321 FO
Posts: 1,114
check6,
The 'flow thru' that you are talking about has been gab for the past 20 years...and still running! No such thing...
I'm not scolding, I am just telling you what I know to be true...oh yeah...puff puff pass...j/k!
Lax
The 'flow thru' that you are talking about has been gab for the past 20 years...and still running! No such thing...
I'm not scolding, I am just telling you what I know to be true...oh yeah...puff puff pass...j/k!
Lax
07-23-2006, 01:00 PM
#12
Tri-tanic operator
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Originally Posted by check6
Actually, Piedmont is the best choice. Better pay and a flow through with a mainline whose most Junior FO is 45. USAirways will need 1000+ pilots within the next two years.
And FYI, USAir also has 1500+ on furlough ....
Better check out the details of that flo-thru deal with some PDT guys ....
12-19-2006, 05:29 PM
#13
Line Holder
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 85
12-21-2006, 10:13 AM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FO - 757/767
Posts: 1,228
There will be NO flowthrough. Why would they DOUBLE their training costs? Plus upgrade at Piedmont is up to 7 years.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
