Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Hawaiian
Combining with Alaska Airlines for a Stronger >

Combining with Alaska Airlines for a Stronger

Search

Notices

Combining with Alaska Airlines for a Stronger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-13-2023, 03:13 PM
  #181  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 313
Default

Originally Posted by av8tor55
What does it cost to run a base? A crew room and some support personnel? Not insignificant, but certainly cost effective if you have a sufficient amount of flights flowing through the islands. I'm no accountant, but I imagine that the cost of per diem, hotels, and crew transportation exceed the operating cost of a base at some point on the balance sheet. You can also factor reserve coverage into the mix. If the FA's have a LAX base for as few turns that we have going through there, I'm sure the math works out for a HNL base.
It would be hilarious if all of Alaskas Hawaii flying gets based out of HNL and branded as Hawaiian. That’s just as likely as whatever fostro is spouting off about. HNL to Japan flights aren’t going anywhere. Historically, they are very profitable. For the amount of interisland flying Hawaiian does there’s no chance we copy Southwest and their interisland tag leg model. Some people just like to stir the pot. Fostro must be one of those 1500 hour wonders from Skybest.
Hawaii808 is offline  
Old 12-13-2023, 03:46 PM
  #182  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by fostro
The HNL base will eventually be gone. HA has mentioned closing the WB base on several occasions, no other airline has a base in HNL. The cost to operate a base in HNL is CRAZY expensive, just look at the cost of living. All flights will originate off the West Coast and maybe a few WB based in HNL, 10 crews per tail if we're lucky.
HAL has never mentioned closing the WB base. Not once since they starting flying the DC10, L1011, 767, 330, and very soon the 787.
Akamai is online now  
Old 12-13-2023, 04:33 PM
  #183  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2023
Posts: 379
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii808
It would be hilarious if all of Alaskas Hawaii flying gets based out of HNL and branded as Hawaiian. That’s just as likely as whatever fostro is spouting off about. HNL to Japan flights aren’t going anywhere. Historically, they are very profitable. For the amount of interisland flying Hawaiian does there’s no chance we copy Southwest and their interisland tag leg model. Some people just like to stir the pot. Fostro must be one of those 1500 hour wonders from Skybest.
We will circle back in a few years when your in SEA, in the meantime get your ear muffs and snow jackets. It's good to be positive nothing at HA will change we will continue inter-island and 2-day, 3-day trips on the WB I'm sure that's the plan.


In Unity.....
fostro is offline  
Old 12-13-2023, 05:16 PM
  #184  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 33
Default

Originally Posted by fostro
We will circle back in a few years when your in SEA, in the meantime get your ear muffs and snow jackets. It's good to be positive nothing at HA will change we will continue inter-island and 2-day, 3-day trips on the WB I'm sure that's the plan.


In Unity.....
No one knows what HNL looks like in a couple years. I kinda agree that we gonna see a lot of changes. For now things stay the same and AK will start watching the operation. I think no more wide body flying to the mainland once the 330 leases run out. Some international flying stays and some probably goes. We're losing a lot of money and Japan still hasn't recovered. I dobut AK keeps all our flights if they aren't making money. If I was betting I'd say mostly 737's in HNL within 5 years. Some 787's but not 24 widebodys. A lot of us won't hold the position we're in now in HNL. If we were making money I'd say they don't make big changes. But the only thing making money rn is west coast flying and maybe a few International routes. TBH the only thing about this deal that makes me excited is that we'll finally gonna have a management that knows what it's doing. They wanna make money and what we're doing rn isn't making money. All you guys acting like you know what's gonna happen after 1 week of reading press releases lol.
Fakawat is offline  
Old 12-13-2023, 05:40 PM
  #185  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,286
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii808
It would be hilarious if all of Alaskas Hawaii flying gets based out of HNL and branded as Hawaiian. That’s just as likely as whatever fostro is spouting off about. HNL to Japan flights aren’t going anywhere. Historically, they are very profitable. For the amount of interisland flying Hawaiian does there’s no chance we copy Southwest and their interisland tag leg model. Some people just like to stir the pot. Fostro must be one of those 1500 hour wonders from Skybest.
I think it's possible that under New Alaska a lot of the Hawaii flying will be in Hawaii branding, and we may see a reduction in Hawaii trips from the smaller bases and that flying moved to the HNL base... but there is no way that the Seattle good ol' boys club are giving up their Hawaii layovers. Realistically though, Alaska just keeps it spread out around the different bases, like it is now. Somehow it works on their pairing building philosophy, especially for those beautiful red eyes back to the west coast from the islands.
ImperialxRat is offline  
Old 12-13-2023, 06:24 PM
  #186  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,205
Default

In this climate they're not going to force-transfer a bunch pilots from LAX or SFO, or even SEA, to HNL.

If they did the pilots would simply stay in their base, same or similar plane, but with a big-three paint job.

In the same vein, I don't think they want a big shakeup in HI either, with lost local jobs and the kind of hate and discontent they got from closing the VX NY base.

And I can't imagine it would be more economical than mainland to base NB pilots on the islands, other than for inter-island. Not that any of their mainland bases are low COL, but HNL is almost in it's own league in that regard.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-13-2023, 07:24 PM
  #187  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Squeakygreaser's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 173
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
In this climate they're not going to force-transfer a bunch pilots from LAX or SFO, or even SEA, to HNL.

If they did the pilots would simply stay in their base, same or similar plane, but with a big-three paint job.

In the same vein, I don't think they want a big shakeup in HI either, with lost local jobs and the kind of hate and discontent they got from closing the VX NY base.
I think that's a good point, Alaska will probably try not to put too much hurt on the pilots at least for a while, I gotta imagine that headquarters in HNL is going to be pretty much gone though.

The thing is Alaska is going to make money, if there is a part of the Hawaiian flying that isn't making money it's going to be gone. I think it's more likely that you guys are going to be seeing transition classes in to the 737 rather than out of it for the most part.

I wonder if Alaska will keep the Amazon thing or try to get out of it. I imagine in an aquisition you could probably seek to renegotiate a deal like that, Amazon themselves might may even wantto get out of it.
Squeakygreaser is offline  
Old 12-13-2023, 07:47 PM
  #188  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Moonwolf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Sleeping
Posts: 1,047
Default

Originally Posted by fostro
We will circle back in a few years when your in SEA, in the meantime get your ear muffs and snow jackets. It's good to be positive nothing at HA will change we will continue inter-island and 2-day, 3-day trips on the WB I'm sure that's the plan.


In Unity.....
that’s cool you just made your profile right after the merger announcement and come here spouting of some lame duck shizznnit. You know jack all, you most definitely will not see me in Seattle.

in unity my 🖕🏽
Moonwolf is offline  
Old 12-13-2023, 07:54 PM
  #189  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,657
Default

Originally Posted by Neosporin
Considering AS's successful business plan, they'll look at the financials related to the 717 and park it asap. It's a financial burden, mx costs, parts, lack of parts, reliability, customer confidence including loss business to SW. Delays and cancellations.
Except it's not like we have planes laying around to replace them with. We're not going to cut back other flying to replace the 717. It will be a strategic plan that makes sense financially and logistically. I don't see it happening for at least 5 years.
word302 is offline  
Old 12-13-2023, 08:12 PM
  #190  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 313
Default

Originally Posted by word302
Except it's not like we have planes laying around to replace them with. We're not going to cut back other flying to replace the 717. It will be a strategic plan that makes sense financially and logistically. I don't see it happening for at least 5 years.
considering Hawaiian owns most, if not all of the 717s, it’s probably gonna get phased out on a the same timeline that Hawaiian was going to anyways. Hawaiian has said 5 years for the last 5 years though. Makes the fleet decision easier as it’s probably gonna be 737s.
Hawaii808 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AirBear
Major
0
04-14-2020 03:25 PM
av8tiongeek
Alaska
8
11-19-2018 06:40 PM
vagabond
Major
11
10-29-2013 09:45 AM
vagabond
Major
6
11-03-2008 11:29 AM
vagabond
Major
19
06-15-2007 06:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices