Search

Notices

Hawaiian Hiring FOs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2024, 11:38 AM
  #661  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 223
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Cargo is a very valid reason to not fly RJ's. Compared to NB's, they have almost no cargo capacity, other than checked bags.

So given that I'd guess 717's linger until MAX7's are available. Since AS is mandated to retain inter-island service, they'll probably want to make money at it.

Maybe MAX8's, but AS seems to have an inside track on 737 deliveries so I'm sure they can convert orders between 8 and 7, or maybe even adopt delivery slots abandonded by other carriers (pretty sure that's already happened recently).
I think the 7s are a pipe dream, the 8s have proven they can go everywhere the 700s used to, and they are far more flexible. In my opinion 7s make sense if you’re going to cattle car them a la Southwest and Ryan. Who knows though, I’d be pleasantly surprised and not unhappy to see the here.
DenainaPilot is offline  
Old 09-24-2024, 12:18 PM
  #662  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,205
Default

Originally Posted by DenainaPilot
I think the 7s are a pipe dream, the 8s have proven they can go everywhere the 700s used to, and they are far more flexible. In my opinion 7s make sense if you’re going to cattle car them a la Southwest and Ryan. Who knows though, I’d be pleasantly surprised and not unhappy to see the here.
Assuming equal production availability, it will come down to economics, which is variable depending on the mission. Lots of number crunching needed, far more than we could do on web forums.

In some cases it can make sense to operate a larger airframe below full capacity, even though it costs more up front and burns more gas, just to have the ASM's during lucrative peak travel periods. Again, lots of numbers to crunch.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-24-2024, 03:32 PM
  #663  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 33
Default

Originally Posted by Neosporin
Scope doesn't cover Lanai and Molokai. The small jet or whatever could fly those islands.
If the ATR42 wasn't profitable, the Ejet definitely won't be. We have no reason resume service to either of those islands without some kind of government subsidy.
yeahidk is offline  
Old 09-24-2024, 03:55 PM
  #664  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 223
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Assuming equal production availability, it will come down to economics, which is variable depending on the mission. Lots of number crunching needed, far more than we could do on web forums.

In some cases it can make sense to operate a larger airframe below full capacity, even though it costs more up front and burns more gas, just to have the ASM's during lucrative peak travel periods. Again, lots of numbers to crunch.
Yes, everything we are doing here is just a WAG. I’m just basing my opinion on what I’ve seen in the Arctic, which I think is similar to inter-island. Time will tell of course.
DenainaPilot is offline  
Old 09-24-2024, 09:46 PM
  #665  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2022
Posts: 162
Default

Originally Posted by yeahidk
If the ATR42 wasn't profitable, the Ejet definitely won't be. We have no reason resume service to either of those islands without some kind of government subsidy.
Yeah but that was the same management that cant make money with 321s/330s/787s either
Disappointment is offline  
Old 09-24-2024, 10:21 PM
  #666  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,492
Default

MKK and LNY are small airports with not a lot of travelers.
Hawaiian flew a DC-9 into MKK twice a day if I remember correctly. 4500" runway with rising terrrain. Could not do it when S-SW winds were there.
HA looked at doing it with the 717, but modern SMS procedures did not allow it.
Really a small island and airport with not a huge demand. Used to be serviced small aircraft and Island Air Dash-8s.
Rama is offline  
Old 09-24-2024, 11:50 PM
  #667  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 313
Default

Originally Posted by Disappointment
Yeah but that was the same management that cant make money with 321s/330s/787s either
unless Alaska feels like getting some caravans and Pilatus aircraft there is zero chance of making a profit in those communities. The population numbers do not support Jet service or anything bigger than a 19 seat turboprop a few times a day.
Hawaii808 is offline  
Old 09-25-2024, 12:23 AM
  #668  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: CL65 El Capitano
Posts: 396
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii808
unless Alaska feels like getting some caravans and Pilatus aircraft there is zero chance of making a profit in those communities. The population numbers do not support Jet service or anything bigger than a 19 seat turboprop a few times a day.
SeaGliders!
Poopchute701 is offline  
Old 09-25-2024, 12:32 AM
  #669  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Cessna 205
Posts: 255
Default

Originally Posted by Poopchute701
SeaGliders!
clearandcold is offline  
Old 09-25-2024, 01:18 PM
  #670  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Neosporin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: outside
Posts: 721
Default

Originally Posted by yeahidk
If the ATR42 wasn't profitable, the Ejet definitely won't be. We have no reason resume service to either of those islands without some kind of government subsidy.
That's a little insesitive to locals living in Molokai especially. There are so many kupuna and wheel chair bound citizens pregnacies, etc; there is a moral and civil duty to service that island, yes EAS should step in and award this to HA not Mokulele.
The concern of the ATR not making money, well it would be a wash if the prevoius management made money, then that would have been part of the bottom line the lack of profit from those island destinations. Like SW airlines works, our prevoius management spread propoganda that SWA didnt make money here in the islands and was never full. Do you think SWA cares, no, they have their entire domestic network to compensdate, just as they have always done to attack competitors and drop prices, they gave headged fuel in the past and were able to operate at a loss on some routes to crush others.
Our two big excuses from management were 'boo hoo hoo', Japan hasn't returned and SWA.

I dont know the entireity obvioulsy but with Alaska's profit and a committment to service all of Hawaii, something could be done to operate into MKK and LNY, plus scope won't be violated if Horizon does it.
All they need, especially MKK is reliable service a couple times a day.
Neosporin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MelodieM
Hiring News
1
06-09-2022 03:41 AM
Flyby1206
Major
41
12-28-2012 10:35 AM
racemey
Hiring News
35
06-18-2010 02:52 PM
ProceedOnCourse
Hiring News
23
08-16-2009 06:40 PM
FlywithStyle
Regional
40
06-28-2009 12:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices