Passenger-Carrying Drone Gets Approval in NV
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 377
Passenger-Carrying Drone Gets Approval in NV
The Verge reports: "Chinese company Ehang caught our eye at CES earlier year, with the firm unveiling an autonomous quadcopter prototype it said was capable of ferrying human passengers without a pilot. We were wary of these unproven claims, but Ehang is obviously forging ahead with the vehicle. The company recently reached an agreement with Nevada's governor's office to develop the Ehang 184 at the state's FAA-approved UAV test site. However, this news should be taken with a pinch of salt: the Ehang 184 still isn't approved for testing by the FAA itself, and the company has yet to show a fully working prototype."
Ehang says it plans to begin testing at the FAA-approved site some time later this year. Some of the difficulties it will have to face include creating an autonomous navigation system that can detect small obstacles like power lines, creating and regulating fixed paths for air travel, and managing the limitations of battery life (Ehang claims the 184 has a maximum flight time of 23 minutes).
https://news.slashdot.org/story/16/0...ghts-in-nevada
Ehang says it plans to begin testing at the FAA-approved site some time later this year. Some of the difficulties it will have to face include creating an autonomous navigation system that can detect small obstacles like power lines, creating and regulating fixed paths for air travel, and managing the limitations of battery life (Ehang claims the 184 has a maximum flight time of 23 minutes).
https://news.slashdot.org/story/16/0...ghts-in-nevada
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 699
Probably still 10 years away, but this has great potential for evacuating wounded soldiers from combat.
If we had these during Viet Nam, we would have saved thousands of lives.
If we had these during Viet Nam, we would have saved thousands of lives.
#3
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: doggy style
Posts: 1,006
Quad copters require ALL 4 motors to work. One goes out and you're guaranteed dead man. There are several reasons why this is a dumb idea.
#5
Should be more worried by Boeing and Airbuses efforts to remove at least one pilot from the cockpit with established technology.
#6
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Flag of convenience like NAI allows Boeing/Airbus to go ahead with single pilot aircraft. Full drone aircraft will not happen until computer technology advances beyond silicon, which is a long way off if ever.
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
convenience ...
go ahead with single pilot aircraft.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post