Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Iraq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-20-2014, 11:08 AM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Position: still here...
Posts: 226
Default

Originally Posted by Sum Ting Wong
The Constitution, as written, did not "separate" religion nor the Church from active participation within and by the Federal "State". It declared only that the Federal Government could not prefer or "establish" one Church or religion to the detriment of another (as many of the existing Colonies/states had done). One of the first actions of Congress was to fund chapels on military posts and chaplains for the military. No "separation" at all, which accounts for the wording of oaths of office and in courts at the time, as well as for benedictions at government gatherings.
Don't muddy this emotional debate with facts! Come on, man!
mosteam3985 is offline  
Old 06-22-2014, 10:26 AM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpwannabe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Student Pilot
Posts: 2,277
Default

Originally Posted by T45Heinous
That option would open a huge bag of worms that none of us could predict...
Agreed! However, IMHO, I think that it's a viable option.

Originally Posted by T45Heinous
You have non-state actors, sponsored/financed by the US, killing citizens/terrorists of another country...IN that country...
We've been doing that for years!


Originally Posted by jungle
Just a guess, but you have zero military experience and don't really understand the strategy, tactics or logistics required to go into hostile territory; kill or run off large numbers of hostiles and maintain control of the real estate..
On the contrary...served in the US Army.

Originally Posted by jungle
Private security firms have flourished because it is incredibly expensive to fund large standing modern military organizations.

The current situation is likely to end in a long struggle between various tribes and whose invisible man is best, but it is really about money and power for those running the various factions. They just want to carve up their little piece of the pie, and if oil goes up in the meantime they all profit more.

I don't think the Saudis, Kuwait, or Iran would be heartbroken over a spike in oil prices and if it can be gained by cheaply arming 6,000-12,000 savages and turning them loose all the better.

Creating chaos is easy and inexpensive, creating order is difficult and very costly.
Savages? We thought that about the Vietnamese and we got our "butts" kicked.

As far as creating order that is up to the indigenous citizens of Iraq...the Sunnis and Shiites. Its a very delicate balance of political and military posturing that US finds itself in right now.


atp
atpwannabe is offline  
Old 06-22-2014, 11:09 AM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

Savages? We thought that about the Vietnamese and we got our "butts" kicked.
You'll need to clarify exactly on what level did we get our butts kicked.
Did they not teach the difference between the tactical, strategic, and political in the Army?
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 06-22-2014, 11:18 AM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 4,026
Default

Originally Posted by satpak77
Uh, you do know what the back of our currency, issued by the state, says,
Just saying...
Yep, I know that was added to paper currency in 1957 and adopted as an official motto at that time. It was used previously, but intermittently, on coins, since 1864. It definitely does not have roots in our country's founding, but was a response to increased religiousness in the 1860s during the Civil War. That's a hard argument to make if you are basing it on our founding fathers, the principles under which our country was founded, and the constitution.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 06-22-2014, 11:32 AM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 4,026
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
You'll need to clarify exactly on what level did we get our butts kicked.
Did they not teach the difference between the tactical, strategic, and political in the Army?
It seems like we always find a way to convince ourselves of the "strategic value". Almost as a chicken vs. the egg type scenario.

Korea wasn't a "win" either, but at least we drew a line in the sand and have the support of the people on "our side".
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 06-22-2014, 12:58 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpwannabe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Student Pilot
Posts: 2,277
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
You'll need to clarify exactly on what level did we get our butts kicked.?
We have no military presence in Vietnam. None, notta; nil. As another poster pointed out..."we drew the line in the sand in Korea"...not so in Vietnam.

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Did they not teach the difference between the tactical, strategic, and political in the Army?
Yes, they did. My question is..."Which one did we 'win' or have the upper hand"? When its all said and done, we still have no military presence or political influence in Southeast Asia....at least not like we have in other parts of the world.


atp
atpwannabe is offline  
Old 06-22-2014, 01:19 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

Originally Posted by atpwannabe
We have no military presence in Vietnam. None, notta; nil. As another poster pointed out..."we drew the line in the sand in Korea"...not so in Vietnam.



Yes, they did. My question is..."Which one did we 'win' or have the upper hand"? When its all said and done, we still have no military presence or political influence in Southeast Asia....at least not like we have in other parts of the world.


atp
So a military presence is the bench mark of your criteria?
Ok.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 06-22-2014, 03:50 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
F15Cricket's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Right Seat 737, Front seat T-6
Posts: 536
Default

Originally Posted by atpwannabe
When its all said and done, we still have no military presence or political influence in Southeast Asia....at least not like we have in other parts of the world.


atp
You mean "other" than Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore ...
F15Cricket is offline  
Old 06-22-2014, 04:06 PM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,939
Default

A country with a Sunni leadership and Shia minority.
Shia and Kurds oppressed.
Invade.
Nothing to do with 9/11, but apparently WMDs and a bad guy to his oppressed people.
Invasion complete, eventually Sunni leader dead, "democratic" elections, Shia new Iraq leadership.
US leaves.

Did anyone think that was really going to be "The End"?


The second the US soldiers left the stage was set for a civil war conflict. There's a reason Saddam ruled with an iron fist. Now that was by no means a good country back in 2003 with Saddam in power, but after billions of dollars and thousands of US soldier lives dead, was it really worth it? Has anything changed? Is Iraq and the world really better off today than they were in 2003?

The whole situation is terrible. One million+ displacements / refugees. It breaks my heart to see this:




and this:




The biggest critical failure recently has been the Iraqi security forces and local police putting down their guns and running. They're cowards and the country is paying for it deeply now.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 06-22-2014, 04:09 PM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
So a military presence is the bench mark of your criteria?
Ok.
I thought the important benchmark of victory was the number of McDonald's and KFC franchises established.
tomgoodman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Whale Pilot
Cargo
6
11-14-2008 08:13 AM
PiperPower
Part 135
11
09-17-2008 06:38 AM
BoilerWings
Major
58
07-18-2008 01:34 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
1
03-28-2007 04:26 PM
Jakob
Hangar Talk
5
01-13-2007 10:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices