Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Zimmerman is not guilty!!! >

Zimmerman is not guilty!!!

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Zimmerman is not guilty!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-2013, 02:19 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cardiomd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Seat: Vegan friendly faux leather
Posts: 988
Default

Comments apt to be misconstrued.

As a doc, any policy that increases the likelihood of sustained violence and threats to health, I am against.

Last edited by cardiomd; 07-15-2013 at 02:53 PM.
cardiomd is offline  
Old 07-15-2013, 02:20 PM
  #52  
Custom User Title
 
AZFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,271
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead

My one and only question for people who believe Zimmerman was well within his right is this....How was Trayvon Martin supposed to know that George Zimmerman wasn't some deranged serial killer/rapist?
True, TM wouldn't have possibly known. A reasonable person wouldn't seek interaction with such unknown factor. TM didn't exercise this reasonable judgement.

The facts do say that Zimmerman exited his vehicle and initially began to chase Martin, but then stopped. Perhaps Martin should have ran home or called the police, but then again if he was hiding from Zimmerman maybe he didn't want to compromise his position and/or want Zimmerman to know where he lived.
Trayvon apparently eluded Zimmerman (as evidenced by the 911 call). At that point, Zimmerman began returning to his vehicle. This would now show that Trayvon was no longer reasonably able to believe that his life and limb were in immediate danger.
What is most troublesome for me is had Martin killed Zimmerman by use of force or with his weapon, then it would be is for Martin to be found not guilty as well under Florida's "Stand Your Ground Laws".
If Trayvon had killed Zimmerman, it would have been murder under the current facts of the case. When Zimmerman broke off his pursuit/chase of Trayvon and began returning to his car, Trayvon had ample opportunity to retreat/go home. Trayvon didn't do that. The law would say a reasonable person would have used every reasonable opportunity to escape. Instead, Trayvon re-initiated violent contact with Zimmerman AFTER having a very good opportunity to go home/leave. This point is critical, because if Zimmerman hadn't broken off his pursuit or if Trayvon hadn't successfully eluded Zimmerman, then Trayvon would have had a successful claim of justifiable homicide in self-defense (in this hypothetical scenario of TM killing GZ), or in the actual scenario, it would have been much more difficult (impossible?) for the defense to claim self-defense.
AZFlyer is offline  
Old 07-15-2013, 02:32 PM
  #53  
Custom User Title
 
AZFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,271
Default

Originally Posted by cardiomd
I do hope you do realize there is a continuous realm of "instigating." It creates a silly unstable situation like you'd see in some third-world country. Going near an Ohio State game with a Michigan jersey and shouting for the away team might start a bar-fight, and yes, a nose might be broken. Was wearing the jersey instigation? How about shouting something about their team?
All of that is irrelevant to this case. Comparing a scuff derived from sports rivalries and someone being accused of seeking to cause bodily harm/murder are completely incomparable. The law wouldn't see it your way (and hasn't seen it your way; reference the FL woman who just received 20 years despite claiming self-defense).

Losing a fight results in some lost pride. Introduce a "justified" gun use into the mix and a whole host of situations are suddenly very, very lethal. It treats a very grey area with a black and white lens. I don't know why this is hard for so many people to understand.
You seem to be implying that the 'fight' was a fair fight to begin with. Zimmerman was attacked while returning to his car. Evidence supports that claim. This wasn't just a bar-room scuffle between drunk sports fans. It is disturbing that you're trying rationalize this that way.

If some of my (particularly younger) relatives saw a big Hispanic guy following them on their way home, I think a similar thing might have happened. Perhaps that is the Italian blood (we are emotional people).
I'm of direct Italian descent and have no problem controlling my emotions or behavior.
The guy that did it would not have long to live after being released back into the wild (we are emotional people). He would vanish without a trace. Escalating violence.
Making up irrelevant scenarios that have nothing to do with the case.

I've seen a lot of GSW in my time, and every one is tragic. Almost all are unneccessary. Before you go there (as people tend to) I have a CCW permit. I'm not anti-gun, I'm anti-vigilante. I'm anti-cop-wannabe. I am called to the ER to see if I can do anything for a gunshot way too often.
I too carry concealed every single day, very pro-2A. So what? The testimony by Zimmerman is supported by the evidence.

Cops have organized training, and hopefully wouldn't get their butts kicked by a 17 year old kid who "attacked" them. I'm surprised people defend this guy.
Your use of quotations around that word speaks volumes on what you believe/want to believe happened.
AZFlyer is offline  
Old 07-15-2013, 02:48 PM
  #54  
Junior Senior
 
LNL76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Whiskey Papa
Posts: 2,851
Default

geez, and I thought I was the only Italian on here....
LNL76 is offline  
Old 07-15-2013, 02:58 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cardiomd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Seat: Vegan friendly faux leather
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by AZFlyer
I'm of direct Italian descent and have no problem controlling my emotions or behavior.
I'd beg to differ. You just are not conscious of them.

Point is, different people have different ideas about "instigation." Some of my friends, and possibly relatives, would probably have either beaten Zimmerman when they saw him following them, or possibly killed him. Feared for their life, stalked by a big strange man. I'd defend them, but I can see both sides of any argument.
cardiomd is offline  
Old 07-15-2013, 03:07 PM
  #56  
Custom User Title
 
AZFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,271
Default

Originally Posted by cardiomd
Point is, different people have different ideas about "instigation."
Irrelevant with regard to what the law says.
AZFlyer is offline  
Old 07-15-2013, 04:44 PM
  #57  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by cardiomd
Agreed with this ridiculous bias. Knowing MMA is not a crime, being "into MMA" is not a crime. It doesn't make you a thug. Lots of my family is into martial arts and there are even some Krav Maga experts here. He was a 17 year old kid, I don't know many kids that haven't gotten into a schoolyard fight at some time in their lives.

My son won't look like Trayvon. However, if one day he, or any member of my family, went to the convenience store and didn't come back, shot dead, because somebody followed him with a gun, I'd be beyond angry. And his "knowing MMA" or being a better fighter than somebody who was chasing him, shouldn't be an excuse for death. I could go to any number of places and provoke a fight then shoot the person dead if/when they get the upper hand. Not that hard to do and sets a really dangerous precedent. In fact, if GZ had some decent MMA training maybe he wouldn't have had to use a gun. That guy looks like he couldn't even run a quarter mile.

Is it true GZ applied repeatedly and failed to get into any police department? I can't tell anymore what are facts vs spin, but the guy just rubs me the wrong way. He was trying to be a hero and instead picking on members of his own neighborhood with tragic consequences.

I predict GZ will get a huge civil penalty (he is, ultimately, responsible for the events; if he stayed in his car none of this would have happened.) Then, after awhile, if he behaves himself and stays out of trouble, nothing further will happen. However, also likely he will become just like OJ and wind up in trouble for something else, where the book will (should) be thrown at him.
Just a word of advice, tell your sons that assault with intent is going to get them hurt one day, maybe shot.
This case is one of self defense against assault with intent, trying to spin it any other way makes you look a little funny.
Forget the race, the backgrounds and the media-one man assaulted another and it didn't turn out well. End of story.

There really isn't any more to say except acting like a thug is eventually going to end badly for all involved.
jungle is offline  
Old 07-15-2013, 05:03 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
I think therein lies the reason that this case has got so much attention. The case has been molded into a case about race, gun laws, and civil rights.

Personally, I think the president should be ashamed of himself for attempting to use this kid's death as a form of media attention. I'd expect that type of garbage from ol' Al and Jesse, but not from our commander in chief. Can't say was surprised by that though.


Perhaps I'm in the minority of people because I'm not even looking at the racial aspects of this case.

My one and only question for people who believe Zimmerman was well within his right is this....How was Trayvon Martin supposed to know that George Zimmerman wasn't some deranged serial killer/rapist?
The facts do say that Zimmerman exited his vehicle and initially began to chase Martin, but then stopped. Perhaps Martin should have ran home or called the police, but then again if he was hiding from Zimmerman maybe he didn't want to compromise his position and/or want Zimmerman to know where he lived.

What is most troublesome for me is had Martin killed Zimmerman by use of force or with his weapon, then it would be is for Martin to be found not guilty as well under Florida's "Stand Your Ground Laws".


For what it's worth I do believe Zimmerman's version of the story. I'm partially playing devil's advocate here, but honestly I just feel as though this thing quickly got out of hand for both Zimmerman and Martin.
Who threw the 1st punch? Simple as that. If the answer is I don't know then you must have reasonable doubt. But all of the evidence points to the fact that TM threw the 1st punch.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 07-15-2013, 05:15 PM
  #59  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by cardiomd
I'd beg to differ. You just are not conscious of them.

Point is, different people have different ideas about "instigation." Some of my friends, and possibly relatives, would probably have either beaten Zimmerman when they saw him following them, or possibly killed him. Feared for their life, stalked by a big strange man. I'd defend them, but I can see both sides of any argument.
Big strange man? Zimmerman is 5'7 (i.e. that's not considered big in most circles) and had a whopping 15 lbs on TM at the time. TM had 4 inches in height on him and was an athlete and interested in MMA.

Try to stick to the facts and not use spin words to advance your motive.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 07-15-2013, 09:29 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
savall's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: French American
Posts: 417
Default

I got no horse in this race, but I do want to point out that Trayvon (like 95% of modern teens) was a dumbass old high school kid. He also likely wasn't fully developed mentally to assess situations and make what we all would agree would be a reasonable decision to walk away. Regardless, if he did proceed to confront homeboy again, then that's on him.
At the end of the day, the jury knows more than any of us possibly will barring reading every document presented during the trial and they made their decision. I was very surprised that he got off entirely though based on all the hype. Though not much comes through across the Atlantic...

My main interest news wise is the Asiana crash, so I will remain on that thread to discuss the outcome / argue / express opinion / etc
savall is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
DLpilot
Major
29
07-16-2012 06:35 AM
PearlPilot
Flight Schools and Training
9
05-24-2010 10:36 AM
okbk
Major
14
01-09-2010 10:51 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
0
12-15-2007 05:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices