Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
FAA CLOSING 173 Control towers >

FAA CLOSING 173 Control towers

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

FAA CLOSING 173 Control towers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2013, 08:43 PM
  #61  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Originally Posted by Yoda2
Many 121 flights already operate from "uncontrolled" fields. All you need is security and for the fire Dept. to show up. I'd be just as or more concerned with folks busting the void time clearances this is sure to generate, if it happens. Other than that, like Galaxy flier was inferring, brush up on the non tower Ops. and remember not all those aircraft will even have a radio... BTW, I have had just as many near misses or high pucker factor in class D airspace as non towered.
Brush up on uncontrolled airspace, learn to use FSS, flight watch, RCOs, and all that other stuff most CFIs and 135 guys do on a daily basis? OH, THE HUMANITY!!
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 03-13-2013, 04:18 PM
  #62  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: DHC-8 F.O.
Posts: 8
Default

This is only with the sequester, right? I know it goes into effect soon, but won't they open back up once they pass a new budget?
akelley3 is offline  
Old 03-13-2013, 04:37 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Left seat of a Jet
Posts: 514
Default

Originally Posted by akelley3
This is only with the sequester, right? I know it goes into effect soon, but won't they open back up once they pass a new budget?



Maybe, maybe not! if the nation's airspace have few problems with the towers closed why open them back up if savings are the point of the closings. My understanding are the cutting of aviation projects or easier than cutting highway projects. Highway projects are controlled by some sort of congressional mandate.
bozobigtop is offline  
Old 03-13-2013, 05:32 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UnderOveur's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: Holding over Macho Grande
Posts: 602
Default

If the tower at our airfield closes (and it's on the list), I can virtually guarantee there will be a BIG increase in safety issues. Several busy flight schools plus lots of low time GA pilots does not make for a safe uncontrolled flight environment. I've been flying out of there since '01, before it became a towered field, and the difference was night and day (to use an analogy).

Is this preventable? Yes. Does the branch of gov't responsible want to prevent it (and lots like it)? Absolutely not.
UnderOveur is offline  
Old 03-14-2013, 04:41 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Feds offering high-paid internships despite sequester | Fox News
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 03-14-2013, 05:25 AM
  #66  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Gjn290
I don't think the towers should close. No matter what cuts the federal government needs to make, the safety of air travel should never be compromised. The cuts need to be made elsewhere. Too bad they won't look elsewhere.

They're using fear tactics to turn this country against each other more than they already are.
Fixed your post for you.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 03-14-2013, 08:35 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpwannabe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Student Pilot
Posts: 2,277
Default

Quite frankly, I was suprised to see OPF & ORL made the list. This, all closings, is a recipe for diaster.....literally!




atp
atpwannabe is offline  
Old 03-14-2013, 12:00 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 350
Default

Originally Posted by UnderOveur
... Does the branch of gov't responsible want to prevent it (and lots like it)? Absolutely not.
This comment is disingenuous. The towers will close because it's what the White House wants, plain and simple. Nobody in the FAA wants this, excepting maybe the Administrator.
EasternATC is offline  
Old 03-14-2013, 12:06 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

Originally Posted by UnderOveur
If the tower at our airfield closes (and it's on the list), I can virtually guarantee there will be a BIG increase in safety issues. Several busy flight schools plus lots of low time GA pilots does not make for a safe uncontrolled flight environment. I've been flying out of there since '01, before it became a towered field, and the difference was night and day (to use an analogy).

Is this preventable? Yes. Does the branch of gov't responsible want to prevent it (and lots like it)? Absolutely not.
Originally Posted by EasternATC
This comment is disingenuous. The towers will close because it's what the White House wants, plain and simple. Nobody in the FAA wants this, excepting maybe the Administrator.
Executive Branch is what he meant I think.
I'm sure the administrator probably doesn't WANT it - but he has his own marching orders.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 03-14-2013, 04:30 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UnderOveur's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: Holding over Macho Grande
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Fixed your post for you.

No, you really didn't.
UnderOveur is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dckozak
Regional
0
11-12-2010 05:03 AM
USMC3197
Regional
66
11-12-2009 06:54 PM
corl737
Major
7
09-04-2009 05:41 PM
Lambourne
Major
45
09-01-2009 03:27 AM
AUS_ATC
Hangar Talk
0
03-08-2006 06:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices