Another step forward for the U.S. military.
01-26-2013, 06:40 AM
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,576
Combat requires a special mentality that is more often found in the male of our species. Sorry, if that is not PC. Many men should not be in combat. Go into a kindergarden class and watch the kids. Which ones would you pick for future service? The ones playing house or princess (boys or girls) or the ones fighting and playing war, or cops & robbers, or cowboys & indians, etc. Don't try to argue we raise our kids that way. They are born different. Men and women are different in more ways than the physical. The problem with today is we don't let boys be boys. For some reason it's not PC to be male anymore.
Are there going to be a few female exceptions to the rule that would do well in combat? Sure, but very few. Never lower the standards, always raise the person to the standard.
01-26-2013, 06:43 AM
#42
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: electron wrangler
Posts: 372
Re: Another step forward for the U. S.
And here is an example of the Navy lowering the standards to force the PC issue...
Kara Hultgreen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Kara Hultgreen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[Happens all the time]
This forum is like watching a snake eat a rat. It's repulsive to see but so fascinating,
I can't take my eyes off it.
I guess I'm just naive. I had no idea misogynist Neanderthals with inadequate penis issues still existed. Coming here is sort of like going to the zoo without having to put clothes on.
.
Last edited by N2264J; 01-26-2013 at 07:10 AM.
01-26-2013, 06:49 AM
#43
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Pilot
Posts: 2,625
Are you ok with your daughters being drafted?
01-26-2013, 06:51 AM
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: retired
Posts: 992
rants.
I said if anyone wants to sign up for the front lines, God bless 'em. Not me....I'm not cut out for it. Then again, I'm sure there are plenty of males who aren't either. AND you're totally off the mark with your stupid "liberal chicks" comment as they don't believe in war and would never sign up for anything, much less the front lines.
I said if anyone wants to sign up for the front lines, God bless 'em. Not me....I'm not cut out for it. Then again, I'm sure there are plenty of males who aren't either. AND you're totally off the mark with your stupid "liberal chicks" comment as they don't believe in war and would never sign up for anything, much less the front lines.
01-26-2013, 06:52 AM
#45
Junior Senior
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Whiskey Papa
Posts: 2,851
To the gentlemen (or females) standing up to the neanderthals and misogynists----a heartfelt thank you. Thanks for not joining the group think so prevalent on here sometimes. It's very refreshing and has not gone unnoticed. 
01-26-2013, 07:17 AM
#47
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 96
Right. That's the issue for people who don't see the big picture. The issue for everyone else is combat effectiveness.
01-26-2013, 07:19 AM
#48
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 96
Yeah, because no man has ever crashed a military aircraft due to pilot error.
[Happens all the time]
This forum is like watching a snake eat a rat. It's repulsive to see but so fascinating,
I can't take my eyes off it.
I guess I'm just naive. I had no idea misogynist Neanderthals with inadequate penis issues still existed. Coming here is sort of like going to the zoo without having to put clothes on.
.
[Happens all the time]
This forum is like watching a snake eat a rat. It's repulsive to see but so fascinating,
I can't take my eyes off it.
I guess I'm just naive. I had no idea misogynist Neanderthals with inadequate penis issues still existed. Coming here is sort of like going to the zoo without having to put clothes on.
.
01-26-2013, 07:21 AM
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 4,024
01-26-2013, 07:22 AM
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 4,024
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
