Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Climategate--The Final Chapter >

Climategate--The Final Chapter

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Climategate--The Final Chapter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2016, 01:30 PM
  #761  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
So, are you implying that our global climate would be different today if not for the approximately 520 atmospheric nuclear bombs tested 40-60 years ago?
Not at all. Hubris makes us miss even the simplest of points. Let's try again. I was just demonstrating that your assertion below is demonstrably WRONG.

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
I'm equally amazed to see the hubris inherent in a bunch lemmings who actually believe that human efforts can have a positive or negative effect on the earth's climate on a global scale.
'Human efforts' created arsenals of nuclear bombs that could indeed have a tremendously "negative effect on the earth's climate on a global scale" if they were unleashed. And 'common sense' didn't figure out how to produce nuclear fission nor is it a key credential in the field of climatology.
Flytolive is offline  
Old 04-04-2016, 01:37 PM
  #762  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
It is amazing to see a bunch of pilots think we know more about the climate and with such certainty than the overwhelming majority of climate scientists in the world.
Want some facts?


Here is a fact:

A bunch of "scientists" dependent upon research funding for their livelihoods are NOT going to tell the public their science proves they are not needed, jeopardizing their livelihoods.

Here's another fact:

The "climatologists" you revere so much have been PROVEN to be cooking their data to fit their theory.

Yet another fact:

In the history of science, the "consensus" has repeatedly been proven wrong.

Here's yet another fact:

The deep need to continually hype "consensus" proves the political motivation behind the "global warmin"...errrr...."climate change" movement. "Consensus" is politically driven and has no place in genuine science.





(Meanwhile, let's all ignore the FACT that the GW alarmists are now calling for the jailing and death of those who disagree with them. Hmmmk?)

http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/20...rs-under-rico/
SayAlt is offline  
Old 04-04-2016, 01:44 PM
  #763  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by SayAlt
Want some facts?
As with your other posts there are no facts, but at least you managed one without calling climate scientists 'leftist fascists'. That would appear to be progress for you.
Flytolive is offline  
Old 04-04-2016, 01:55 PM
  #764  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Default

Ho hum.

As with your other posts you simply claim no facts have been presented.

Who is the real "denier", again?
SayAlt is offline  
Old 04-04-2016, 01:59 PM
  #765  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,989
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
Not at all. Hubris makes us miss even the simplest of points. Let's try again. I was just demonstrating that your assertion below is demonstrably WRONG.
Well, the onus is on you to somehow prove we can effect the global climate. Good luck with that. So far, no definitive link has ever been made between the presence of humans on earth, their activity and positive or negative changes in global climate. I believe we haven't had an effect and we can't. It's not up to me to prove a negative. Producing some internet pseudo scientist trying to further the climate change agenda is going to waste everyone's time, so don't bother.

Originally Posted by Flytolive
'Human efforts' created arsenals of nuclear bombs that could indeed have a tremendously "negative effect on the earth's climate on a global scale" if they were unleashed.
Gotta love the lengths your types will go to in order to push your agenda. Now we're talking about shooting off all the nukes on the planet in a climate change discussion. I really have no idea what unleashing the entire global nuclear arsenal at once would do to the weather. Isn't worrying about that about the same thing as worrying about what unloading a .357 magnum into someone's head is going to do to their mascara?
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 04-04-2016, 02:13 PM
  #766  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
Well, the onus is on you to somehow prove we can effect the global climate.
No. That is the point. It is up to the experts. Your premises are as flawed as your logic. Better luck next time.
Flytolive is offline  
Old 04-04-2016, 02:24 PM
  #767  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive

No. That is the point. It is up to the experts.

You mean the same kind of "experts" who Time Magazine interviewed who predicted an ice age just a few short decades ago?







Better luck next time.
SayAlt is offline  
Old 04-04-2016, 02:31 PM
  #768  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,989
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
No. That is the point it is up to the experts.
Okay. Well, you let us all know when they finally do that. I won't hold my breath (even though that might help with the whole CO2 thing ). Maybe we'll catch up in another 30 years when nothing has changed because of human efforts, the inconvenient truth still isn't true and the carbon credit collectors are laughing their asses off while sipping Dom on their yachts.
I'm going to go out and grill a steak, smoke a nice Cuban, rip a few farts and try to forget I wasted my time in this ridiculous exchange.

Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 04-04-2016, 02:36 PM
  #769  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by SayAlt
You mean the same kind of "experts" who Time Magazine interviewed who predicted an ice age just a few short decades ago?
According to Time the cover is fake like most else of what you post. Are you ever embarrassed by repeatedly posting such BS?

TIME Magazine Cover Warning of Coming Ice Age Is a Fake | TIME.com

Also, you might have heard about these useful devices called computers. It is amazing the progress that has been made in the field along with all kinds of data collection and processing power/techniques.

Ever hear of Moore's Law?

[
Flytolive is offline  
Old 04-04-2016, 03:20 PM
  #770  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RhinoPherret's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,026
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
According to Time the cover is fake like most else of what you post. Are you ever embarrassed by repeatedly posting such BS?

TIME Magazine Cover Warning of Coming Ice Age Is a Fake | TIME.com

Also, you might have heard about these useful devices called computers. It is amazing the progress that has been made in the field along with all kinds of data collection and processing power/techniques.

Ever hear of Moore's Law?

[
Nice little graph. Dime a dozen out there. Proves nothing as related to what you wish it did.

Congratulations.

If all you have to worry and obsess about in life is global warming and/or climate change (remember the two are totally separate terms with only a causal relationship) then you have arrived!

All the biased hyperbole thrown around on this subject matter really does not mean squat to me as I am not naive enough or pompous enough to think humankind is significant enough to have meaningful impact on either. Realistic science backs that notion up. I am way over myself in thinking how important I and fellow human beings are in relation to the big picture in regards to this on-going cycle that has been occurring since an atmosphere was first formed and will continue in like manner.

So, moving right along, what else would you care to obsess about?
RhinoPherret is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CLewis
Part 135
5
07-11-2011 07:35 PM
FlyJSH
Regional
666
05-22-2011 06:43 PM
Gajre539
The Boneyard
0
07-19-2010 02:45 PM
hslightnin
Mesa Airlines
207
01-07-2010 07:33 PM
BEWELCH
Flight Schools and Training
43
03-21-2007 10:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices