Climategate--The Final Chapter
08-01-2016, 11:47 AM
#1001
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
LOL
You are right about one thing. I can get emotional when people...like hypocritical climate fear-mongers...are very clearly and intentionally lying to the public, avoid/deflect from/ignore direct questions, steal taxpayer funds to promote ideologically-driven agendas, and love to pretend they have morals and are better than other people when in fact they have been proven to have none whatsoever and rank among the lowest filth on the planet.
I also tend to get angry with lying hypocrites who lay claim to not having engaged in emotional argument....like calling skeptics "deniers" and saying things like "you couldn't win an 8th grade debate" (clearly intended as an emotional-based insult)....then subsequently pretend they haven't engaged in such behavior, as you just did. Even worse is when they seek to subvert the criminal justice system to prosecute and penalize anyone who dares to disagree with them and their unproven theory AFTER having engaged in such behavior.
I am confident it is very clear to anyone who has taken the time to read through this thread, and our exchanges in it, who is being reasonably skeptical in this age of proven big gov't deception and collusion vs. who is being dishonest and evasive. After all, us skeptics aren't trying to subvert the law and prosecute anyone for having a scientific theory, unlike the alarmist fear-mongers who now seek to criminalize anyone who promotes skepticism of their unproven theory.
Calling you a useful idiot, sir, isn't an insult per se, it is merely an observation of fact. Now run along and drink your kool-aid.
You are right about one thing. I can get emotional when people...like hypocritical climate fear-mongers...are very clearly and intentionally lying to the public, avoid/deflect from/ignore direct questions, steal taxpayer funds to promote ideologically-driven agendas, and love to pretend they have morals and are better than other people when in fact they have been proven to have none whatsoever and rank among the lowest filth on the planet.
I also tend to get angry with lying hypocrites who lay claim to not having engaged in emotional argument....like calling skeptics "deniers" and saying things like "you couldn't win an 8th grade debate" (clearly intended as an emotional-based insult)....then subsequently pretend they haven't engaged in such behavior, as you just did. Even worse is when they seek to subvert the criminal justice system to prosecute and penalize anyone who dares to disagree with them and their unproven theory AFTER having engaged in such behavior.
I am confident it is very clear to anyone who has taken the time to read through this thread, and our exchanges in it, who is being reasonably skeptical in this age of proven big gov't deception and collusion vs. who is being dishonest and evasive. After all, us skeptics aren't trying to subvert the law and prosecute anyone for having a scientific theory, unlike the alarmist fear-mongers who now seek to criminalize anyone who promotes skepticism of their unproven theory.
Calling you a useful idiot, sir, isn't an insult per se, it is merely an observation of fact. Now run along and drink your kool-aid.
08-01-2016, 01:51 PM
#1002
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
KP, My saying you couldn't win an eight grade debate statement was only after your ridiculous comparisons to socialists, fascists, neofascists and of course, nazis. Such juvenile name-calling is indicative of someone whose arguments, like yours, are vacuous.
Global Warming Blows Past Previous Records in 2016 | Mother Jones
Global Warming Blows Past Previous Records in 2016 | Mother Jones
08-01-2016, 02:27 PM
#1003
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
1/2 the democrat party...of which "climate change" is a major party plank...supports avowed and committed socialist Bernie Sanders...and yet you say calling them socialists is "vacuous"?!
Calling those who seek to criminalize dissent as "fascist" is "name-calling"??
You leave me in tears of laughter. But I do appreciate how ridiculous you are making yourself look.
Meanwhile...
Global Temperatures Are Mostly Fake | Real Science
....and....
date: Wed Apr 15 14:29:03 2009
from: Phil Jones <[email protected]> subject: Re: Fwd: Re: contribution to RealClimate.org
to: Thomas Crowley <[email protected]>
Tom,
The issue Ray alludes to is that in addition to the issue
of many more drifters providing measurements over the last
5-10 years, the measurements are coming in from places where
we didn’t have much ship data in the past. For much of the SH between 40 and 60S the normals are mostly made up as there is very little ship data there.
Cheers
Phil
di2.nu/foia/foia2011/mail/2729.txt
from: Phil Jones <[email protected]> subject: Re: Fwd: Re: contribution to RealClimate.org
to: Thomas Crowley <[email protected]>
Tom,
The issue Ray alludes to is that in addition to the issue
of many more drifters providing measurements over the last
5-10 years, the measurements are coming in from places where
we didn’t have much ship data in the past. For much of the SH between 40 and 60S the normals are mostly made up as there is very little ship data there.
Cheers
Phil
di2.nu/foia/foia2011/mail/2729.txt
This date in 1934 may have been the hottest in US history. The map below shows actual temperatures, not the “heat index.” Almost two-thirds of the US was over 100F on July 21, 1934 – with temperatures of 115 in Missouri and South Dakota, and 113 in Minnesota.
No serious scientist would make claims based on fake data, which is why NOAA does it. Their climate people are propagandists, not scientists.
08-02-2016, 04:41 AM
#1005
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
(sigh)
Deflect, distract, obfuscate. It's all you know how to do!
In the immortal words of Jules Winnfield, "Oh, you were finished! Well, allow me to retort."
Democrat Sen. Bernie Sanders: "Hillary should apologize to America for her vote in favor of the war."
Moreover, it's ironic how Hillary and her sycophants didn't pick one of the parents of the fallen soldiers from Benghazi to speak, isn't it? Funny how the "unbiased" lamestream media is giving 50x more attention to Khizr Khan than to Pat Smith. Perhaps a better testimony from Khizr Khan would have been for him to talk about how Hillary Clinton was in the U.S. Senate when she voted to invade Iraq. It was her vote, not Trump's, that sent Capt. Khan to his death. And then it was her decisions later to render Capt. Khan's sacrifice worthless. Try sticking that into your dog whistle and blowing it.
This is a thread about the ongoing Climategate fraud. Don't even try debating politics with me, boy. You'd lose that one too.
Btw, debating politics in this forum is against forum rules. It is clear that the moderators have allowed this thread to continue because the debate is 90%+ about the science (or lack thereof) re: the topic of global warmin....errrr...."climate change"....not politics per se. To be clear, the only reason I mentioned emails, rigging the game, etc. is because those who have now been proven to engage in that kind of behavior are the exact same ones perpetrating the ongoing Climategate fraud. It is beyond clear they cook the books, rig the game/debate, and are utterly dishonest, even to the point of betraying their own supporters (as the DNC did to Sanders).
That is evidence to the topic at hand, Climategate, and only brought up in that context.
Deflect, distract, obfuscate. It's all you know how to do!
In the immortal words of Jules Winnfield, "Oh, you were finished! Well, allow me to retort."
Democrat Sen. Bernie Sanders: "Hillary should apologize to America for her vote in favor of the war."
Moreover, it's ironic how Hillary and her sycophants didn't pick one of the parents of the fallen soldiers from Benghazi to speak, isn't it? Funny how the "unbiased" lamestream media is giving 50x more attention to Khizr Khan than to Pat Smith. Perhaps a better testimony from Khizr Khan would have been for him to talk about how Hillary Clinton was in the U.S. Senate when she voted to invade Iraq. It was her vote, not Trump's, that sent Capt. Khan to his death. And then it was her decisions later to render Capt. Khan's sacrifice worthless. Try sticking that into your dog whistle and blowing it.
This is a thread about the ongoing Climategate fraud. Don't even try debating politics with me, boy. You'd lose that one too.
Btw, debating politics in this forum is against forum rules. It is clear that the moderators have allowed this thread to continue because the debate is 90%+ about the science (or lack thereof) re: the topic of global warmin....errrr...."climate change"....not politics per se. To be clear, the only reason I mentioned emails, rigging the game, etc. is because those who have now been proven to engage in that kind of behavior are the exact same ones perpetrating the ongoing Climategate fraud. It is beyond clear they cook the books, rig the game/debate, and are utterly dishonest, even to the point of betraying their own supporters (as the DNC did to Sanders).
That is evidence to the topic at hand, Climategate, and only brought up in that context.
Last edited by SayAlt; 08-02-2016 at 05:21 AM.
08-02-2016, 05:28 AM
#1007
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
That post was in direct response to the previous post from Iceman and the article he cited. Either you are too ignorant to realize that or you are being disingenuous.
Either way, thanks for proving my points about you. You are too easy.
Either way, thanks for proving my points about you. You are too easy.
08-02-2016, 05:46 AM
#1009
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
^^^^^^^^^
Yep, it's all about the $$ to be made. The warmulists really could care less about the planet. The "environment" is merely a means to an end for the hypocrites, as they repeatedly demonstrate when they fly their private jets to speak about the evils of "carbon emissions". They themselves don't seriously believe in "global warming", only the money they can make from the fraud.
Next?
Yep, it's all about the $$ to be made. The warmulists really could care less about the planet. The "environment" is merely a means to an end for the hypocrites, as they repeatedly demonstrate when they fly their private jets to speak about the evils of "carbon emissions". They themselves don't seriously believe in "global warming", only the money they can make from the fraud.
Next?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
