Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

FAA Shutdown

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2011, 10:28 AM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 79
Default

I would not necessarily worry about the loss of community organizer jobs as much as the blockage of upgrades and repairs to infrastructure. But most of all as the article mentions they are doing because of a disagreement over making it harder for people to unionize.
jvr553 is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 10:29 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Oldfreightdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: B-737
Posts: 392
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Being one of them now, I have to say what outrage would be shared on this board if someone came on and gave big high fives for 4,000 airline employees being laid off.
Your opinions of "what's the bad news" and "win-win" are terrible.

USMCFLYR
I assuming that "one of them" means you work for the FAA? What have been specifically told by your superiors? Will there be an FAA shutdown? I wonder how it will effect the airlines?

Good luck.
Oldfreightdawg is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 10:35 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: What day is it?
Posts: 963
Default

[moderator edit: remove politics as best I can]

ONE congressman, John Mica (R-FL) who chairs the House committee has made it his goal to have a rider in the FUNDING legislation that will restrict the rights of airline and rail employees to have union representation.

It has NOTHING to do with budgets. Because of his shenanigans, the FAA has been living on temporary authorizations since 2007. Over 21 different ones that should never have happened. There SHOULD have been a clean funding authorization.

Over 200 million a week in uncollected fees and taxes because of this...yeah, that's gonna help.

[moderator delete]

Last edited by TonyWilliams; 07-24-2011 at 12:11 AM.
ATCsaidDoWhat is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 10:41 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: What day is it?
Posts: 963
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
The difference is 1. the FAA is as efficient as the DMV on quaalude and 2. as friendly as a pit bull. If this were an airline the sympathy would be much higher based on the sheer facts of 1&2 alone. Also the majority of the airline people have spent time on the ropes whereas the FAA puts people on the ropes.

Also what airline could put 4,000 people on the street yet still operate? That is an awful lot of NON ESSENTIAL personnell.

L
They're not here to make you happy. They're here to make sure your airline follows proper maintenance procedures...training procedures...and a whole host of other stuff. The best way to keep them out of your knickers is to not do stupid things.
ATCsaidDoWhat is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 10:50 AM
  #25  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Being one of them now, I have to say what outrage would be shared on this board if someone came on and gave big high fives for 4,000 airline employees being laid off.
Your opinions of "what's the bad news" and "win-win" are terrible.

USMCFLYR
While it stinks that they are being laid off (for the time being...), the fact is that the government is wayyyy over bloated. Would you be saying the same if all the waste that is the IRS got streamlined?
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 11:12 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Courtroom
Posts: 177
Default

I hope those morons in Oklahoma City are the first to go. Service at the BMV is like a 5 star Hilton compared to the FAA's medical division.
citation35hf is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 12:32 PM
  #27  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Being one of them now, I have to say what outrage would be shared on this board if someone came on and gave big high fives for 4,000 airline employees being laid off.
Your opinions of "what's the bad news" and "win-win" are terrible.

USMCFLYR
You're right about the "high fives", that shouldn't happen.

However, we take in about 2.5 trillion in revenues every year. 2.5 TRILLION!! And I take home less than 50% of my gross earnings. But 2.5 TRILLION isn't enough, because our government spends 4 TRILLION every year. That leaves us needing to borrow over 1.5 TRILLION every year in order to not default.

The FAA is just one government bureaucracy that will need to be drastically cut if there is any hope to stop borrowing 1.5 TRILLION every year. If we don't make these decisions, they WILL be made for us. The world market will make these decisions for us one day very soon. Argentina and Greece, etc will show you what that looks like when it happens.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 12:45 PM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 92
Default

So when you "win win" guys can't get the approach lights turned or the ILS is out and you have to divert who are you going blame? Hope it's not the furloughed bloated government employees....
AFOX1BRAVO is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 01:44 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by ATCsaidDoWhat
They're not here to make you happy. They're here to make sure your airline follows proper maintenance procedures...training procedures...and a whole host of other stuff. The best way to keep them out of your knickers is to not do stupid things.
Are you saying it will be a free for all starting with the shutdown?

I am not so sure the current oversight is actually very good to begin with. The PBS documentary on the misdeeds of the outsourced maintenance facilities in Mobile, China and Latin America opened a few eyes. Doesn't appear the FAA really seems to care about proper maintenance or oversight. So what exactly will change with the shutdown, no one around to turn a blind eye to the miscreants?

Should we even discuss the oversight of Valujet and various other companies that were proven unsafe AFTER accidents! Sure the FAA is here to help.

L
Lambourne is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 02:17 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 143
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
Are you saying it will be a free for all starting with the shutdown?

I am not so sure the current oversight is actually very good to begin with. The PBS documentary on the misdeeds of the outsourced maintenance facilities in Mobile, China and Latin America opened a few eyes. Doesn't appear the FAA really seems to care about proper maintenance or oversight. So what exactly will change with the shutdown, no one around to turn a blind eye to the miscreants?

Should we even discuss the oversight of Valujet and various other companies that were proven unsafe AFTER accidents! Sure the FAA is here to help.

L
This is an FAA inspector being exposed as an incompetent moron.Some sample dialogue:

Lawyer:"State your title...
Fed:"Airworthiness Inspector-Avionics".
Lawyer:"Are you an A&P ?"
Fed:"No.."
Lawyer:"Are you an IA ?"
Fed:"No..."
Lawyer:"So what qualifies you to hold this position ?"
Fed:"Well,I've worked with some great mechanics..."
Lawyer:"So,you're an expert by association ?"

It goes downhill from there.The feds revoked a 135 certificate (Aerotrek) based on moronic crap like this.Aerotrek sued the feds and won !

‪Air Trek FAA Deposition Part 1‬‏ - YouTube
frankwasright is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Major
53
03-19-2019 07:17 PM
USMC3197
Regional
66
11-12-2009 06:54 PM
Freightbird
Cargo
9
04-26-2007 04:31 AM
duvie
Major
0
01-30-2007 12:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices