Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
So what's a pilot worth today? >

So what's a pilot worth today?

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

So what's a pilot worth today?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2011, 08:18 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

[Mod edit: delete]


This discussion is not about what is, but rather about what could be. I paid my own way through Canterbury Prep School then went to Dartmouth College class of '88 known as Joseph Csizmadia on a full ride because I was poor. Went to work for CommutAir and turned down job offers at Vanguard and Spirit. I interviewed with both companies just for the experience. Lucky for me I made a fortune running my wife's family trust fund and don't really need to work anymore, but continue to work just because it gives me a sense of worth to society and I genuinely hate how I have "earned" my wealth as I feel it has come from exploiting ignorance as shown by the likes of comments that you made. For what it's worth I worked as an intern on Wall St. for Manny-Hanny back in the day and chose to be a pilot because I felt it had a stronger moral backing than finance. Now I'm simply trying to explain to pilots that they are their own worst enemy, and working for less than they are worth is the problem. European trade unions figured this out centuries ago, but somehow America was taken in by the combination of Milton Friedman and Ronald Reagan. Executives in the US make more than 300 times than you, and they couldn't fly a plane for 30 seconds, but you for sure could do their job with no trouble, and yet you work for peanuts. Please explain to me what part of my sentiments makes you mad? Are you not worth more? [Mod edit: delete]

Last edited by TonyWilliams; 05-13-2011 at 10:22 PM.
Sunvox is offline  
Old 05-13-2011, 08:26 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by Clear Right
You all have got to be kidding. You must be part of the millennial generation, or you missed this little thing called DEREGULATION and 9/11. Are you really trying to logically argue that pilots working for Southwest and JetBlue ruined legacy airline pensions and pay scales, really, that is your argument. Please read Hard Landings and then post a logical Statement. Stop blaming other pilots for your airline managements problems. This is a SERVICE industry that is run by supply and demand economics in a globalized, Internet marketing world, deregulation is what allowed the free market economic process to change this industry forever, not some pilot working for a start up. Remember for every Southwest and JetBlue there are a dozen or more failed Start-Ups that were unsuccessful, those Two SWA and JBLU happen to have great customer service products that are consistently leading the industry in Customer Service rankings, free market economics at its best.


This is a democracy and we all make out own choices. Deregulation is a function of public opinion and that is exactly the problem. Your logic is simply this: The laws are X which results in Y so get over it. The laws are X because we as a group let them be that way. You and the entire generation that grew up under Milton Friedman and Ronald Reagan accept that as the status quo. Our fore-fathers were unwilling to accept the status quo and died for their beliefs. If I convince you that you are worth more than a starting salary of $12,000 year and you convince 2 others and we start a movement that changes the face of our union from one that is fractured and apathetic to one that is engaged and unified then we CAN change the current reality, but as long as you accept the status quo you will continue to live under the tyranny of the "king".
Sunvox is offline  
Old 05-13-2011, 09:40 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,039
Default

I agree with Sunvox.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 05-13-2011, 09:58 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rolf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 662
Default

While I don't disagree with everything you said, you sure have a funny way of garnering support (are you one of Carl's students?). From an economic point of view, it is easier and more productive to raise the bar for the lower end than for the high contracts. This would support the high contracts and avoid the historic swings in this industry.

Rolf

P.S. SWAPA supported the Spirit Pilots in their quest
Rolf is offline  
Old 05-14-2011, 12:15 AM
  #25  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
This is a democracy and we all make out own choices. Deregulation is a function of public opinion and that is exactly the problem. Your logic is simply this: The laws are X which results in Y so get over it. The laws are X because we as a group let them be that way. You and the entire generation that grew up under Milton Friedman and Ronald Reagan accept that as the status quo. Our fore-fathers were unwilling to accept the status quo and died for their beliefs. If I convince you that you are worth more than a starting salary of $12,000 year and you convince 2 others and we start a movement that changes the face of our union from one that is fractured and apathetic to one that is engaged and unified then we CAN change the current reality, but as long as you accept the status quo you will continue to live under the tyranny of the "king".
Man the lifeboats, the BS is flooding all compartments.
jungle is offline  
Old 05-14-2011, 12:45 AM
  #26  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
Did you read my other posts? That's the problem. Without the "legacy" costs associated with older workforces it's trivial to throw out pay rates for the top tier that rival the best of the best since the vast majority of that company's workforce is no where near that level and the company has zero pension liability. For better or for worse our nation subscribed to the private pension model and we have as yet not given up on that subscription. If and when the government nationalizes our medicine and our pensions then the playing field between new carrier and old will be level, but until that day if you choose to work for a startup or a regional you are intentionally killing the pension of a legacy worker as well as reducing your own future earnings, but obviously most folks simply don't understand that fact or don't care since that is not the political reality of today.
Sorry, but if the last decades have taught us anything at all, it is that pensions and medical care need to be paid into the employee's account in his name and fully funded. Ownership of these accounts is the only way to ensure their safety.

The idea that either a corporation or government can be trusted to manage an individual's retirement or care has been proven false over and over again.

How exactly is the playing field ever going to be level when you compare an excellent business model to a failed model? It never will be, and you can't ever regulate it to be level.

Worrying about what the other guy does is a waste of time, we can't control it and it will have little effect on a sound business.
jungle is offline  
Old 05-14-2011, 05:23 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 536
Default

Sunvox, while I think your argument is somewhat valid with regard to the income gap (i.e. Executives making 300 times more than pilots) in this particular industry. I must respectfully disagree with your implied thesis that Pilots working for Major Airlines like SWA and JBLU are causing said income disparity. My point is that pilots will not change the free market economics of a Deregulated Airline industry by choosing to not work for a particular airline. Moreover, Thomas Friedman would argue that the globalized marketplace will only provide more competition for our legacy airlines. Look at Emirates growth for example, this is now a global airline industry. And while one could argue that Emirates is "subsidized" they still offer a superior customer service product. As far as the income gap (in any industry) the real solution is for Shareholders to demand fair and relative wealth distribution from the Board of Directors. Solving the income gap requires Executives in this country to engage in Moral and Ethical Values based compensation practices, the solution for this problem lies in the MBA classrooms and the Boardroom.
Clear Right is offline  
Old 05-14-2011, 06:25 AM
  #28  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Let's not forget that ALPO has failed to deliver the goods in terms of salary for many of their dues payers.

The simple fact is that successful business models pay more, it isn't about unions, and it isn't about what a CEO makes.

Imagining that you can move everyone up the scale without limiting pilot supply or recognizing a good business is just fantasy. Unfortunately it is this fantasy which hurts us far more than people working for non-union outfits.
jungle is offline  
Old 05-14-2011, 08:54 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 536
Default

IMHO the problem of supply and demand will solve itself over the next decade due to a wave of retirements. The quality of pilot supply has certainly decreased over the last decade. How many really sharp top of their class graduates are saying they want to be airline pilots due to the decline of wages over the past decade. The military has the highest retention rates in history, airline flying just isn't glamorous anymore. That will have to change as airlines will soon find it difficult to attract high quality and the quantity required soon. Who knows the recall take rate at American? Yes, many have found other jobs, but that is exactly my point they are turning down the a historically "Great Legacy" to pursue other options. Sooner or later management will have to address this issue, unless of course the entire industry doesn't hold their ground on Scope (but I digress).
Clear Right is offline  
Old 05-14-2011, 08:02 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by Clear Right
IMHO the problem of supply and demand will solve itself over the next decade due to a wave of retirements. The quality of pilot supply has certainly decreased over the last decade. How many really sharp top of their class graduates are saying they want to be airline pilots due to the decline of wages over the past decade. The military has the highest retention rates in history, airline flying just isn't glamorous anymore. That will have to change as airlines will soon find it difficult to attract high quality and the quantity required soon. Who knows the recall take rate at American? Yes, many have found other jobs, but that is exactly my point they are turning down the a historically "Great Legacy" to pursue other options. Sooner or later management will have to address this issue, unless of course the entire industry doesn't hold their ground on Scope (but I digress).
The Military hasn't been the primary supplier of pilots to the airlines for years, unless you count the retired Lt Col/Cmdr who think they should be the Captain. Lots of High quality pilots come up the civilian side.
757upspilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TurboCheez
Major
18
05-02-2010 11:33 PM
HSLD
Military
0
04-30-2009 05:27 PM
CloudSailor
Cargo
30
08-27-2007 04:55 PM
Coffee Bitch
Cargo
115
05-23-2007 08:02 AM
SWAjet
Corporate
40
05-02-2007 05:01 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices