Trivia question
#11
Yes, the VOR is one system, the DME another. Different operating freqs, the DME/TACAN freq is linked to the VOR freq so you only dial one. If it is just a TACAN you can track down the ghost freq (VHF) to dial in to get the DME distance but you won't have azmuth.
#13
Crazy. You'll never see me fly one of these approaches unless I have an FMS/GPS backup. Once you lose that radial, all bets are off that you're going to get it back. Just because the FAA says you can do it, doesn't mean it is safe to do so.
#14
This was from a Chapter in the TI 8200.52 - Flight Inspection Handbook.
It is bascially the 'How To' book of flight inspection.
KC - Now we aren't talking about the VOR all of the sudden failing - that could happen at any time. This question was specifically addressing that a DME arcing approach could still be inspected and found within tolerance if the arc transversed an area of unusable radials as long as certain radials (described above) where found to be within all tolerances.
In your case of the VOR failing while in that area of restricted use and then missing the inbound radial and you continue to arc around and hit an obstacle, I'm sure there is a TERPs answer to the protection afforded.
Edit: Ok - just had a TERPster walk by and posed the question too.
His answer - first the VOR receiver would flag 'off' and you would know that the VOR is now out of service. I asked him to answer only the obstacle clearnance question and he said "no". The approach is only built to have the protection provided within the tolerances of the DME arc which is part of the approach. If you were arcing another 90 degs around you could run into something (in theory).
Also to be sure we understand what we are talking here - I'm talking about flight inspecting an approach and what constitutes within tolerance. I'm not saying that the FAA is saying fly this approach in hard IMC. Before reading this passage, if I had seen a VOR/DME arcing approach to an airfield, but on the approach plates (or in the AF/D) there was a note that there were unusable radials contained within that DME arc then I would have thought there was a mistake.
USMCFLYR
It is bascially the 'How To' book of flight inspection.
KC - Now we aren't talking about the VOR all of the sudden failing - that could happen at any time. This question was specifically addressing that a DME arcing approach could still be inspected and found within tolerance if the arc transversed an area of unusable radials as long as certain radials (described above) where found to be within all tolerances.
In your case of the VOR failing while in that area of restricted use and then missing the inbound radial and you continue to arc around and hit an obstacle, I'm sure there is a TERPs answer to the protection afforded.
Edit: Ok - just had a TERPster walk by and posed the question too.
His answer - first the VOR receiver would flag 'off' and you would know that the VOR is now out of service. I asked him to answer only the obstacle clearnance question and he said "no". The approach is only built to have the protection provided within the tolerances of the DME arc which is part of the approach. If you were arcing another 90 degs around you could run into something (in theory).
Also to be sure we understand what we are talking here - I'm talking about flight inspecting an approach and what constitutes within tolerance. I'm not saying that the FAA is saying fly this approach in hard IMC. Before reading this passage, if I had seen a VOR/DME arcing approach to an airfield, but on the approach plates (or in the AF/D) there was a note that there were unusable radials contained within that DME arc then I would have thought there was a mistake.
USMCFLYR
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: Airbus 319/320 Captain
Posts: 880
Part of that sounds like more of a TERPsters question specifically regarding the obstacle clearances, but as far as the last part of your question; YES. From my understanding it is possible for the VOR bearing to fail (or at least the IDENT portion) and not the DME.
USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR
#16
USMCFLYR
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post