Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Why aren't more women airline pilots? >

Why aren't more women airline pilots?

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Why aren't more women airline pilots?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-31-2011, 11:02 PM
  #41  
Line Holder
 
IfitsTuesday's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Q FO
Posts: 73
Default

Originally Posted by Z_Pilot
Many of the best aviators I have shared the flight deck with in the last 10 years are females. I despise blanket statements that some of the posters in this thread have made.
Isn't that a blanket statement?
IfitsTuesday is offline  
Old 04-03-2011, 09:24 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,007
Default

The female pilot social dynamic is unique... so much so that (gustimate) 85-90% of female pilots have for husbands.... an airline pilot or military pilot. No one understands female pilots and the lifestyle better than pilots....

The average 40h/week M-F cubical BA/MBA type dude is: intimated by female pilots, thier skill and ability to handle a traditionally male profession.

and

MBA dude can't handle the social diveristy of the lifestyle: a free private hotel room each night and new male co worker. The opportunities are endless. Not saying this is how it really is, in fact its the opposite, but MBA dude doesn't understand that....

While female pilots are better to fly with because they don't bring the insecurites of testosterone, socially, they can't get a date and are forced to stay "in house".
Snarge is offline  
Old 05-18-2011, 04:57 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

New studies on the number of female pilots.
The numbers indicate big increases in ALL aviation related fields.
---------------
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pitt.../s_737565.html

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 05-18-2011, 06:36 AM
  #44  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,047
Default

The Navy has big problems retaining qualified female officers after the first 5-10 years. They spent years making all manner of efforts to fix this and get retention numbers on par with males, and finally started doing surveys. They found out that most women don't consider a sea-going navy career to be compatible with family plans and lifestyle...duh.

Most women do have a slightly different outlook than men as far as family life goes, probably just biological nature...political correctness aside, there are actual genetic differences between men and women and those exist for the purpose of creating and raising children. I know three female regional CA's (ie eligible for employment at a major next year) who have quit this year due to family concerns. Probably doesn't help when you are married to a pilot, and therefore have to bid opposite schedules for childcare.

Frankly I don't see the "problem" here...as long as women have full access to the career field, from training to left seat of a heavy. I don't think it's anyone's business but the individual's as to whether they choose aviation, or stay in it for the long run.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-18-2011, 07:35 AM
  #45  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

They found out that most women don't consider a sea-going navy career to be compatible with family plans and lifestyle...duh.

Not unlike a large number of pilots (male and female) who whine about spending too much time away from home.
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 05-18-2011, 07:50 AM
  #46  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,047
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH
They found out that most women don't consider a sea-going navy career to be compatible with family plans and lifestyle...duh.

Not unlike a large number of pilots (male and female) who whine about spending too much time away from home.
Unlike aviation, it actually makes sense to join the military with uncertain long-term intentions, or the intention of getting out after a few years. Job training, education benefits (either up-front scholarships or GI-Bill after the fact) and valuable job experience provide plenty of incentive for young folks.

Aviation is different...being self-funded it makes no sense whatsoever to go down that road unless you plan on doing it for a career.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-18-2011, 08:15 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
robthree's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 777, sofa
Posts: 1,183
Default

Originally Posted by LostInPA

I'm preparing to get flamed for this, but I really don't understand why people are so concerned about why there are so few of "(insert group here)" in "(insert career here"). Anyone has the opportunity to become a pilot (provided they can meet established criteria such as obtaining a medical) if they so choose to.

Lost, its statistics.
If X percent of a part made by P&W fails and Y percent of the same part made by GE fails, and X is statically different from Y, then you'll say there's a manufacturing difference.

Of course any individual has the opportunity to become a pilot, but when there is a statistical difference between groups, its not due to individual variation anymore but a systematic difference in the experiences of a group's members.

The whole picture is probably incredibly complex, but I'm sure that no one would be surprised to find women still face discrimination in aviation. Occasionally overt chauvinism, and probably widespread unconscious paternalism. If female naval aviators have a lower retention rate because a sea going career is not attractive, is that because women are built fundamentally differently from men, or because of some outside force that acts differently on men and women? If female regional captains quit to have kids, is because they don't like flying anymore, or because quitting is the best choice available to them at the time? If aviation schools are dominated by male students is that because only males are interested in becoming pilots, or because male dominated schools are unappealing to female students?

Women aren't smarter than men. Blacks aren't stronger than whites. Hindus aren't better than Buddhists. Buckeyes aren't more attractive than Wolverines.

Anywhere you find a statistical difference between sexes, races or religions, then my money is on their being an outside force causing the difference.
robthree is offline  
Old 05-18-2011, 09:18 AM
  #48  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,047
Default

Originally Posted by robthree
Anywhere you find a statistical difference between sexes, races or religions, then my money is on their being an outside force causing the difference.
When it comes to careers with lifestyles involving a lot of time-away from home I think biology plays a factor too. Women tend to be more nurturing, I suspect it's harder for them to spend the time away than for many males.

Also societal expectations probably play a role too, although that may have underlying genetic roots too.

It is reasonably established scientific fact that no gender or known race of humans is smarter or dumber than any other. But it is certainly obvious that women have some different biology and emotional response systems due to their evolutionary role in hunter/gather societies. It's silly to try to pretend that doesn't exist. Modern society can and has changed these roles around, but that doesn't make the underlying evolutionary adaptions go away.

I think there is very little remaining gender discrimination in 121, the last bastions are a few crotchety old captains here and there...and they can't get get away with overt behavior anymore. Certainly not enough to cause a lack on interest at the entry level.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-18-2011, 12:49 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: B737 F/O
Posts: 425
Default

Agreed 100%, Rick.

robthree, you make some very good points as well.

All that being said, I'll still be the cynical one. I really don't care what reasons are causing this difference. I just want another competent pilot in the other seat, regardless of sex. If someone believes that flying is a career in line with their goals and lifestyle, then good for them.
LostInPA is offline  
Old 05-18-2011, 04:21 PM
  #50  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 13
Default

Interesting points here. Some surely more comical than others In response to the original article posted, IMHO, I think there are 2 big contributing factors.

1) I don't think flying has typically been marketed towards women. I would have never thought about it, had I not had a parent who flew for over 40 years (military/airlines).

2) One generally chooses a profession or stays in a profession that is conducive to the lifestyle they want to lead. If a woman's goal in life is to raise kids and family and all that, then they probably are not going to choose a career where they are never at home. Although, it can be done.

As far as women being terrible pilots, I have to laugh. Your gender doesn't make you a good/bad pilot. I've flown with pilots from all spectrums good and bad, male and female. And I would never base ones' skills on their gender.
LadyDriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skippy
GoJet
14
05-14-2009 11:12 AM
bender
Major
64
07-10-2008 11:20 PM
flystraightin
Major
4
05-31-2006 06:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices