Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Single pilot crews by 2020? >

Single pilot crews by 2020?

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Single pilot crews by 2020?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2010, 12:56 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by Phuz
How about they just let us fly the damn things in our underwear at home?

I'm good with that.
ok -- if you are flying the thing at home in your underwear do you still have to wear the hat? And, what about the dot testing, 'cause I'm thinking it's Miller time.
squaretail is offline  
Old 06-16-2010, 04:11 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: DFW A320 FO
Posts: 586
Default

Originally Posted by mynameisjim
If they allow single pilot, will they allow reading? What are you supposed to do locked in a closet for 4 hours by yourself? Pilots would be even more maladjusted and delusional.
You could always air it out
swaayze is offline  
Old 06-16-2010, 04:23 PM
  #13  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainCarl
And the elephant in the room is: What if the pilot dies?
Yeah, after all all those 135 piston singles, light twins, Caravans, Banderantes, Metros, King Airs, 1900s, Shorts, etc, are just falling out of the sky

Don't get me wrong, I think a second pilot is a good insurance policy just like a we shouldn't build a single engine 737. But, the idea single pilot flight is risky is just silly.
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 05:53 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: DFW A320 FO
Posts: 586
Default

Ground based "FO" monitoring a half-dozen flights with control ability covers it.
swaayze is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 08:51 AM
  #15  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,388
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH

Don't get me wrong, I think a second pilot is a good insurance policy just like a we shouldn't build a single engine 737. But, the idea single pilot flight is risky is just silly.
It is not particularly risky on any one single flight, but if you look at the statistics several US airline pilots are incapacitated in flight each year. It makes the news in a minor way in some cases but if there was only one pilot...that could translate to multiple smoking-hole accidents each year.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 09:00 AM
  #16  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,388
Default

Originally Posted by swaayze
Ground based "FO" monitoring a half-dozen flights with control ability covers it.
You're not an electrical or systems engineer are you

The AF tried that with UAV's...turns out that long distance radio/satellite relays are limited by the speed of light. This introduces latency in the control response due to signal transmission and processing delays.

After they figured out that pilots located in the US could not reliably land UAV's by remote control over long distances they had to relocate ground control stations at the overseas TO/landing sites.

So each airline is going to have pilots stationed on duty at each outstation just in case an emergency radio-control landing is required?

What about when al queda hacks into the control system...
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 09:59 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default What's it doing now?

Originally Posted by rickair7777
..turns out that long distance radio/satellite relays are limited by the speed of light. This introduces latency in the control response due to signal transmission and processing delays.
I visited JPL when they were planning the Mars Rover mission. The time lag made even a simple command (like turning to avoid a rock) very complicated. It was unwise to send a second instruction until seeing what the first one had accomplished, and that took a while. Meanwhile, the Rover would still be moving. Kind of like a GCA controller using text messages to direct the approach.
tomgoodman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johnso29
Major
188
08-12-2010 04:06 AM
zyttocs
Corporate
37
12-09-2009 09:41 AM
USMC3197
Regional
66
11-12-2009 06:54 PM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
Russ
Regional
50
12-19-2008 11:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices