Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Jet Blue Driver has a bad day >

Jet Blue Driver has a bad day

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Jet Blue Driver has a bad day

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2010, 08:47 AM
  #31  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,822
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
Sorry but this is not an "event" to me. It serves as confirmation of opinions about a particular carrier and the yutes they have that decided to play airline pilot.

Take the Colgan crash, the Pinnacle "FL410 Club" and some other amazingly stupid things that have happened in the regionals. The puppy mills have produced some really bad pilots.

Many of the pilots working in the industry don't have any sense of what being an airline pilot is about. I have ridden in the back of RJ's that guys taxi and fly like they have stolen them. There is no airmanship or deft touch. I have sat on the jumpseat in a CRJ on a commute to work and watched a F/O fly right through the middle of an easily avoidable cumulus cloud that rocked the crap out the airplane. He turned and smiled and said; "that was fun, I want to find another one". With the quick upgrades and minimal experience they don't have anyone with any longevity in the Capt seat to lead by example.

Again, I am sorry if the truth hurts but the evidence supports the argument. Airline pilots did not lose respect in the eyes of the public. We have given it away with pilots using poor judgment. Be it showing up drunk to fly or going bat crazy when your told "she's just not that into you". It is time for pilots as a group to police our own. No more group hugs or coddling for the weak. Time to make the difficult choices to thin the herd. We need to lead by example and bring the fringe back to the fold. If they choose not to then get them to the PSC and reclaim what was surrendered.

L

I'm glad that regionals are the only ones who screw things up
ERJF15 is offline  
Old 05-22-2010, 04:50 PM
  #32  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,044
Default

SWA killed one little boy. Maybe that doesn't count because he wasn't a pax.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-24-2010, 09:11 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

I would not buy my life insurance premiums based on those stats. Here is what I find interesting in your charts, USAir had one of the greatest number of hull loses for a few years yet they are ranked average. Some of the other carriers had one hull loss, yet they were widebody a/c so that generates a higher rate. Let's see.....more crashes of smaller planes or one crash of a larger plane and the one crash rates as less safe carrier.

Sorry if I don't buy into your logic. How about hull loses per company? Pinnacle owned operations are pretty dangerous if you use that scale along with Fed Ex. Pilots that come through the Gulfstream puppy mill have had active roles, I believe, in most of the recent loss of life accidents in the US.
Lambourne is offline  
Old 05-24-2010, 09:19 AM
  #34  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
I would not buy my life insurance premiums based on those stats. Here is what I find interesting in your charts, USAir had one of the greatest number of hull loses for a few years yet they are ranked average. Some of the other carriers had one hull loss, yet they were widebody a/c so that generates a higher rate. Let's see.....more crashes of smaller planes or one crash of a larger plane and the one crash rates as less safe carrier.

Sorry if I don't buy into your logic. How about hull loses per company? Pinnacle owned operations are pretty dangerous if you use that scale along with Fed Ex. Pilots that come through the Gulfstream puppy mill have had active roles, I believe, in most of the recent loss of life accidents in the US.
Just show us some numbers, shouldn't be too hard to do, there are many safety summaries out there. It isn't my logic, it is something called statistics.
Wow us and find some that prove your point.

Why not show us how many passengers have been fatally injured in Pinnacle operations? That should be easy enough and reflect the quality of your beliefs. Then you could show us a comparison with your own very special airline. That might be fun.

Last edited by jungle; 05-24-2010 at 10:26 AM.
jungle is offline  
Old 05-24-2010, 02:20 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by jungle
Why not show us how many passengers have been fatally injured in Pinnacle operations?
Doesn't Pinnacle own Colgan? Pinnacle Airlines - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Why yes! Yes they do!

You can start here and comment as you see fit...FRONTLINE: flying cheap: watch the full program | PBS

Pretty fitting photo here: Photos: Saab 340B Aircraft Pictures | Airliners.net

For the Gulfstream Puppy Mill crowd: Pilots Warn of Safety Lapses at Regional Airlines - ProPublica

What's next? You want to deny the Holocaust too?

Again your stats from the chart you showed are a bit skewed. They tag AA and UA with "crashes" for the terrorist activity on 9/11. Doesn't seem like an apples/oranges comparison. I mean you imply that Pinnacle should not count the "410 CLUB, DUDE" guys since they were only ones on board to participate in that decision. You want "passengers" not hulls caused by crews.

L
Lambourne is offline  
Old 05-24-2010, 03:41 PM
  #36  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Ok, so far we have weaklings, Jet Blue, FFDOs, over 60 guys, Colgan,Pinnacle, USair, FEDEX, Gulfstream, CRJ drivers, drunks, crazies, a really unique way to interpret statistics which ignores their defined parameters, and of course I am now a holocaust denier. Did I leave anyone out?
You win, I just can't fight the tide.


And yet somehow we managed to rack up the safest decade on record in the good old US of A. Amazing.

Last edited by jungle; 05-24-2010 at 03:56 PM.
jungle is offline  
Old 05-24-2010, 05:02 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by jungle
Ok, so far we have weaklings, Jet Blue, FFDOs, over 60 guys, Colgan,Pinnacle, USair, FEDEX, Gulfstream, CRJ drivers, drunks, crazies, a really unique way to interpret statistics which ignores their defined parameters, and of course I am now a holocaust denier. Did I leave anyone out?
You win, I just can't fight the tide.


And yet somehow we managed to rack up the safest decade on record in the good old US of A. Amazing.
Don't pat yourself on the back too soon. The JetBlue guy was a twofer! FFDO and BlueJet pilot. Colgan and Pinnacle are one entity, another twofer. You were asking about accidents and USAir and FedEx were the leader in hull loses for a few years. I am not trying to throw dirt over the issue like some I can think of.

I am sure the families of those killed in the Colgan BUF crash are able to sleep well at night knowing that this was the safest decade in history. Or those CMR LEX families are probably very relieved to know this as well!

As long as you don't believe there is a problem, then I am sure one doesn't exist. How much did that type of "philosophy" class cost dear old dad at PMU- (Puppy Mill University)?

The similarities are ironic: Puppy Mill Dog Health Problems | eHow.com
Lambourne is offline  
Old 05-24-2010, 05:08 PM
  #38  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Simple mathematics often poses a problem for some of us. Have a nice day.

By the way, I was happy to see that your mom still gives serviceman's discounts.

Last edited by jungle; 05-24-2010 at 06:03 PM.
jungle is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
698jet
Major
82
06-12-2010 05:30 PM
vagabond
Leaving the Career
1
10-15-2008 07:10 PM
200SR20
Major
10
09-24-2008 01:34 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-08-2008 02:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices