Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Aerodyamics Question: When lift starts/stops: >

Aerodyamics Question: When lift starts/stops:

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Aerodyamics Question: When lift starts/stops:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-2009, 08:14 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 747 FO
Posts: 937
Default

Play with this NASA airfoil sim

It's neato!
Zapata is offline  
Old 08-21-2009, 08:51 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WalkOfShame's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: Going Mach Chicken
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by ryan1234
So, I'm a little confused.... does increased airflow (increased kinetic energy) create low pressure.... or does low pressure create increased airflow?

Also does Bernoulli's principle work in the boundary layer?
As an "incompressible" fluid (water, oil, air in subsonic flight, etc.) is forced to try and compress, it speeds up so that the volume (if you will) of the fluid will remain constant. This increase of speed, lowers to pressure of the fluid. Its the decrease in the "flow-able area" (if that makes sense) that causes the increased speed.

As far as your second question, I don't quite understand what your asking. The boundary layer happens because of Bernoulli's principle. A fluid cannot have a boundary layer if it is not moving.
WalkOfShame is offline  
Old 08-21-2009, 09:04 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 747 Captain (Ret,)
Posts: 806
Post

Hi HSLD.

I've just got to jump in on this.

Most of what you have quoted is true, but there are a couple of problems. First, in some cases, Va is not based on the elevator as the primary control problem. In many transport category aircraft the critical control is the rudder, as in the AA accident over NY. There may be some aircraft where the critical control is the aileron, although I don't know of any. Second, in the case of many transport category aircraft, full and abrupt elevator deflection from a trimmed condition will not cause either a stall or an overstress condition even at Vmo. This is because the trimmable horizontal stabilizer has much more control authority than the elevator.

Joe
joepilot is offline  
Old 08-22-2009, 12:24 AM
  #14  
APC co-founder
 
HSLD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B777
Posts: 5,853
Default

Originally Posted by RAHPilot5
Money creates lift
That and paperwork

Originally Posted by ryan1234
So, I'm a little confused.... does increased airflow (increased kinetic energy) create low pressure.... or does low pressure create increased airflow?

Also does Bernoulli's principle work in the boundary layer?
It's all so confusing, back in the helo days, we just beat the air into submission. Now-a-days, I occupy my time wondering if I could airborne on an infinitely long conveyor belt that matched my wheel speed.
HSLD is offline  
Old 08-22-2009, 02:12 AM
  #15  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by AZFlyer

You have two identical airplanes moving in parallel: Airplane 1 is flying at 120kts just off the deck, gear up, at the same altitude it would be at if it were supported by its gear. Airplane 2 is rolling on the ground on its wheels at 120kts. By what I've been "taught", Airplane 1 is the only airplane generating lift, due to the 'facts' listed further up at the top.

The difference between your airplanes is the angle of attack, that is, the angle of the wing to the relative wind. In both cases, the relative wind is horizontal, or parrallel to the ground. The airplane on the ground, with its nose wheel on the ground, has a lower angle of attack. While there is certainly a pressure differential, the fact that it is still on the gorund belies the fact it is not producing sufficient lift to bring the airplane off the ground.

The airplane flying low obviously is generating the lift required, and if the nose were lowered, the ensuing encounter with the ground would be an instant clue as to why. Rotating the nose (pulling back on the yoke) with sufficient airspeed is what causes the wing to acheive an angle of attack to produce lift sufficient to cause the airplane to rise off the ground -- and that's where the fun begins.




Originally Posted by AZFlyer

I contest that wings are always generating lift so long as any amount of air is moving over the wing, forward to aft, regardless of whether the wheels are on the ground. Any why not? Why should a wing care if another separate part of the airplane is touching the ground in order for its aerodynamic functions to work? Physics, right?

So where is the truth??

In between. The airfoil causes a differential pressure when air passes over it. However, the differential pressure is insignificant in terms of wake turbulence disturbances until that differential is sufficient to lift the airplane off the ground.






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 08-22-2009, 05:49 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,398
Default

Originally Posted by HSLD
It's all so confusing, back in the helo days, we just beat the air into submission. Now-a-days, I occupy my time wondering if I could airborne on an infinitely long conveyor belt that matched my wheel speed.

It is confusing, there is so many exceptions to this and that, and many, many variables - it's hard to say ok, "x" causes lift - without talking about rotational flow, viscosity, etc. Maybe there is a fine line between keeping it simple and making it too simple it comes out all wrong (i.e. equal transit theory).
ryan1234 is offline  
Old 08-22-2009, 08:31 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 747 Captain (Ret,)
Posts: 806
Post

Many aircraft, (the Cessna 182 and the B-52, both with full flaps extended, come to mind), are perfectly capable of generating enough lift with the nose wheel on the ground to lift off in a flat attitude. In these aircraft, if you try to land at higher than the reccommended speed, you will probably touch down nose wheel first.

In these aircraft the angle of incidence (the angle between the longitudinal axis of the aircraft and a line from the leading edge of the wing to the trailing edge of the extended flap) is quite substantial. Therefore rolling down the runway you already have a significant angle of attack, and can lift off without raising the nose. Doing so, of course, is likely to lead to an accident, because if you try to hold the aircraft on the runway with forward elevator, the main gear may lift off first, and this would cause serious directional control problems.

Joe
joepilot is offline  
Old 08-23-2009, 06:04 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,105
Default

Here's the simple answer. Yes, the aircraft on the ground is producing some lift. However, the angle of attack isn't great enough to create sufficient lift to overcome the aircraft's weight. As soon as the elevator causes the aircraft's angle of attack to increase, the lift being generated exceeds the aircraft's weight and the aircraft becomes airborne.

If you have ever sat in a window seat near the wing of a 747-400, you will notice something odd. During taxi, the winglet is below you as the wing bends downward due to its weight. As you increase speed for takeoff, the wing rises and before the aircraft is even airborne, the winglet is well above you.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 08-23-2009, 07:27 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by ryan1234
So, I'm a little confused.... does increased airflow (increased kinetic energy) create low pressure.... or does low pressure create increased airflow?

Also does Bernoulli's principle work in the boundary layer?

Rooster and the egg...ooops did I say that

Yes I know roosters dont lay eggs
TPROP4ever is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ryan1234
Technical
49
11-09-2009 07:06 AM
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
22
02-27-2009 12:04 PM
USMCFLYR
Military
16
08-28-2008 09:15 PM
USMCFLYR
Hangar Talk
3
08-23-2008 08:37 PM
Over40
Regional
13
08-06-2008 07:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices