Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Rate this River Visual 19 Execution >

Rate this River Visual 19 Execution

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Rate this River Visual 19 Execution

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2008, 01:47 PM
  #11  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

He/she took 17 seconds from overhead the photographer to touchdown.

The photographer was probably 500 feet from the runway if he was on the perimeter road. 900 if he was in GW Memorial park. (Based on imagery of the clearway)

Assuming the following Average ground speeds from the photographer's position, he flew ______ feet to touchdown and ______ feet from the threshold:


Ave GS Total D D from threshold (photographer @ 500 and 900 ft)
100 kts - 2700 ft - 2200 ft - 1800 ft
120 kts - 3400 ft - 2900 ft - 2400 ft
140 kts - 4000 ft - 3500 ft - 3100 ft
160 kts - 4600 ft - 4100 ft - 3600 ft

You decide choose his ground speed and the photographer's position and decide.
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 12-23-2008, 01:58 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jake Wheeler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: RJ driver
Posts: 320
Default

The River visual is a tough approach. Very tight. Not bad once you do it a few times and maintain proficiency but very challenging when only flying it once a month or every few months.

On an instrumented runway, the touchdown zone markings begin 500 feet down the runway with the aiming point marking (solid white blocks in picture) 1000 feet down the runway. It appears the aircraft touched down between 1000 and 1500 feet, but it is difficult to see due to the angle.

It looks like the nose was angled off on landing but the nose kept the same angle even after landing so it might be a perspective of the viewer and not actually a sideward landing. Even if it was, with high winds and the demanding approach, it still looks okay to me.

Landing on 19 at Reagan is easier than landing on an aircraft carrier, but not by much. Very demanding. It's an okay landing in my book.
Jake Wheeler is offline  
Old 12-24-2008, 05:38 AM
  #13  
Gets ALL Days Off
 
UnlimitedAkro's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Sit down comedian.
Posts: 958
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH
He/she took 17 seconds from overhead the photographer to touchdown.

The photographer was probably 500 feet from the runway if he was on the perimeter road. 900 if he was in GW Memorial park. (Based on imagery of the clearway)

Assuming the following Average ground speeds from the photographer's position, he flew ______ feet to touchdown and ______ feet from the threshold:


Ave GS Total D D from threshold (photographer @ 500 and 900 ft)
100 kts - 2700 ft - 2200 ft - 1800 ft
120 kts - 3400 ft - 2900 ft - 2400 ft
140 kts - 4000 ft - 3500 ft - 3100 ft
160 kts - 4600 ft - 4100 ft - 3600 ft

You decide choose his ground speed and the photographer's position and decide.
hahahaahaha!! oh my... wow.

Infact, just for you....

Budweiser presents: real men of genius (real men of geniiuuuus). Today was salute you Mr. Backseat/I wasnt even in the airplane pilot judgement guy (Mr. Backseat/I wasnt even in the airplane pilot judgement guy!). You drool over airplanes so bad, at your first 500 hours... you certify yourself as an instant expert. Who needs to wait a lifetime to be a major airline captain... when you can judge all of them from Seat 43C in the back of coach, or even better from a lawn with a video camera. The only thing bigger than your love for flying.... your ego. Some say you need to get a life, some say you need to grow up, but we say, you need a beer.... a whole case of beer. (Mr. Backseat/I wasnt even in the airplane pilot judgement guy).
UnlimitedAkro is offline  
Old 12-24-2008, 06:57 AM
  #14  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

The video also says it's a 737:|
Ewfflyer is offline  
Old 12-24-2008, 07:05 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joethepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 227
Default

Really folks... we're judging this guys flying ability based on a you tube video? I think as professionals we should all know better.
joethepilot is offline  
Old 12-24-2008, 07:33 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

A little long... yes... dangerous.. no. Its severe clear and a dry runway. If the wind is blowing that can be a biatch of an approach.... flew it a couple of times in the 170.... at night.. now that will get your attention... years ago when I flew the ATR we flew it a ton.
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 12-24-2008, 04:47 PM
  #17  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Originally Posted by UnlimitedAkro
hahahaahaha!! oh my... wow.

Infact, just for you....

Budweiser presents: real men of genius (real men of geniiuuuus). Today was salute you Mr. Backseat/I wasnt even in the airplane pilot judgement guy (Mr. Backseat/I wasnt even in the airplane pilot judgement guy!). You drool over airplanes so bad, at your first 500 hours... you certify yourself as an instant expert. Who needs to wait a lifetime to be a major airline captain... when you can judge all of them from Seat 43C in the back of coach, or even better from a lawn with a video camera. The only thing bigger than your love for flying.... your ego. Some say you need to get a life, some say you need to grow up, but we say, you need a beer.... a whole case of beer. (Mr. Backseat/I wasnt even in the airplane pilot judgement guy).

Not sure if you are calling me the backseat pilot, but if you were, I would ask you reread my post.

All I did was time the video from when the plane appears directly overhead to touchdown (17 seconds) and look at the satellite photo of the the 19 clearway. Then, based on a range of groundspeeds, calculated the distance covered (whiz wheel type stuff).

Personnally I despise Monday Morning Quarterbacks. That is why my only opinion/guess was that the photographer appeared to be 500 feet from the threshold based on the sat picture and the perspective on the last few seconds of film. The rest is a bit of math. Then, I left it up to others to decide his pilot's fatee.
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 12-24-2008, 05:09 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 215
Default

i dont care about him being high and long. what bothers me is he didnt kick rudder
normajean21 is offline  
Old 12-26-2008, 04:21 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Inbluskyz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 153
Default

If the aircraft was a little high and carrying a little extra airspeed, then straightening the aircraft in the flair may have resulted in floating further down the runway. They probably wanted to just get on the pavement. However, landing with a crab angle is OK.
Inbluskyz is offline  
Old 12-26-2008, 05:03 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,369
Default

Originally Posted by normajean21
i dont care about him being high and long. what bothers me is he didnt kick rudder
Ok Mr Standards Guy.... What airline do you work for?
cencal83406 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mswmsw
Money Talk
4
09-02-2009 10:08 AM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
72
11-30-2008 03:26 AM
av8tordude
Money Talk
2
11-17-2008 09:33 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices