Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
My Idea of the perfect airplane >

My Idea of the perfect airplane

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

My Idea of the perfect airplane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2008, 08:02 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Longbow64's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: PA-44 Left
Posts: 221
Default My Idea of the perfect airplane

This is my idea of a perfect airplane Exploreraero Ecoflyer, OSH 08. I think it's an LSA made in Canada. Just watch the video you'll understand. Here's a link to the manufacture's website Exploreraero Ecoflyer. I especially like the amphibian model. If I had 200K laying around, I would definitely buy one
Longbow64 is offline  
Old 12-03-2008, 08:41 AM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 39
Default

Looks cute, but it has fixed seats. I probably wouldnt beable to fly it. I have to use a pillow in a 172 with the seats all the way forward.
Av8nFL180nBelow is offline  
Old 12-03-2008, 08:47 AM
  #3  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

Looks like a guppy! Neat concept though
Ewfflyer is offline  
Old 12-03-2008, 09:26 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Planespotta's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Dream within a dream
Posts: 1,306
Cool MY idea of the perfect airplane

Photos: Lockheed L-1011-385-1 TriStar 1 Aircraft Pictures | Airliners.net
Planespotta is offline  
Old 12-03-2008, 09:37 AM
  #5  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

Not trying to pour water on the design but they did not give any data on useful load and it would just have to be pretty small. No matter what it is, there will be a temptation to overload the airplane with all that space inside to fill. This means of course that it is likely to be crashed. Experience shows people are stupid enough to do this, especially in summer when such a design would appeal the most, and the large interior space adds to the problem.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 12-03-2008, 09:20 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,398
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver
Not trying to pour water on the design but they did not give any data on useful load and it would just have to be pretty small. No matter what it is, there will be a temptation to overload the airplane with all that space inside to fill. This means of course that it is likely to be crashed. Experience shows people are stupid enough to do this, especially in summer when such a design would appeal the most, and the large interior space adds to the problem.
The guy in the video mentioned it weighs 750 and has a useful load of 600 with 30 gal fuel... which has me scratching my head a little....
you are right about the internal space... no offense to those who fly new LSA's.... but at least around our airport they (that market) are much more prone to crashing from failing to calculate CG and/or simply over-loading, etc... that huge space inside is like an invitation to...
ryan1234 is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 06:25 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: I only fly multi-winged airplanes.
Posts: 321
Default

I'd have to say as far as doing its particular job...I like the Avanti Piaggio...Fuel efficient props that go faster than some of the jets out there!

I also think the Dash 8-400 is probably the best regional airliner out there. 70 seats at about 300 kts...thats pretty sick witted.

The Pilatus is speed with fuel/cost efficiency. One engine means less work/cost during the inspections.
CaptainTeezy is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 11:45 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,576
Default

I'll stick with the 777, but I am looking forward to flying the 787 soon.
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 12:06 PM
  #9  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

Originally Posted by ryan1234
The guy in the video mentioned it weighs 750 and has a useful load of 600 with 30 gal fuel... which has me scratching my head a little....
you are right about the internal space... no offense to those who fly new LSA's.... but at least around our airport they (that market) are much more prone to crashing from failing to calculate CG and/or simply over-loading, etc... that huge space inside is like an invitation to...
LSA MTOW (1350 lbs.) minus Ecoflyer empty wt (750 lbs.) = 600 lb. useful load.

So, the 600 lbs. is for cargo+people+pets+fuel. Minus 30 gal. fuel (180 lbs.) that leaves only 420 lbs. for everything. Two people will knock 400 lbs. off that easy. Now you are down to 20 lbs. It will be no time before someone goofs up, throws a dog or a loaded ice chest in the back... the picture is not pretty.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 01:58 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
airventure's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver
LSA MTOW (1350 lbs.) minus Ecoflyer empty wt (750 lbs.) = 600 lb. useful load.

So, the 600 lbs. is for cargo+people+pets+fuel. Minus 30 gal. fuel (180 lbs.) that leaves only 420 lbs. for everything. Two people will knock 400 lbs. off that easy. Now you are down to 20 lbs. It will be no time before someone goofs up, throws a dog or a loaded ice chest in the back... the picture is not pretty.
How's that any different than a 172 which in all practical purposes is a two person airplane? A quick W&B of an R model shows 450lbs after full tanks. On top of that there are two very tempting seats in back to place an extra couple hundred pounds in.
airventure is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlyinFoSheezy
Hangar Talk
3
10-12-2008 01:27 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
4
08-29-2008 05:41 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 10:14 PM
RockBottom
Hangar Talk
43
08-02-2008 07:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices