Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
National Longevity List >

National Longevity List

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

National Longevity List

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-2008, 08:15 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Senior Skipper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: the correct seat
Posts: 1,422
Default National Longevity List

I was just on JetCareers, and a user proposed a National Longevity List in lieu of a National Seniority List. I have to say this makes good sense to me. What are the opinions on APC? Why hasn't this been pushed? The NSL has it's drawbacks. What drawbacks would exist for a Longevity list?

Here's part of the post from user WalterSobchak:

I think we need National Longevity not so much seniority. Just like Teaching. They all have different unions but you get credit for your years of service. So if you do get furloughed at Airline A you go to the bottom of the seniority list at Airline B, but start at the payscale for your corresponding year. National Seniority would be retarded. Are you going to go to some one else's airline and bump them down because they picked a better company than you did to start?
Senior Skipper is offline  
Old 06-12-2008, 08:23 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Spartan
Posts: 3,652
Default

Never gonna happen...mgmt would never go for it. You'd need a true 'union' to make it work. Email Prater and tell us what he says.
Slice is offline  
Old 06-13-2008, 12:05 PM
  #3  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

hmmm and if it DID happen, those furloughed would either not get hired because they are too expensive or be forced to resign his/her longevity number.
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 06-13-2008, 12:07 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hotshot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: C172 Left
Posts: 642
Default

Originally Posted by Senior Skipper
I was just on JetCareers, and a user proposed a National Longevity List in lieu of a National Seniority List. I have to say this makes good sense to me. What are the opinions on APC? Why hasn't this been pushed? The NSL has it's drawbacks. What drawbacks would exist for a Longevity list?

Here's part of the post from user WalterSobchak:

I think we need National Longevity not so much seniority. Just like Teaching. They all have different unions but you get credit for your years of service. So if you do get furloughed at Airline A you go to the bottom of the seniority list at Airline B, but start at the payscale for your corresponding year. National Seniority would be retarded. Are you going to go to some one else's airline and bump them down because they picked a better company than you did to start?
Looking at de727ups's profile?
hotshot is offline  
Old 06-13-2008, 02:46 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 440
Default

Originally Posted by Senior Skipper
I was just on JetCareers, and a user proposed a National Longevity List in lieu of a National Seniority List. I have to say this makes good sense to me. What are the opinions on APC? Why hasn't this been pushed? The NSL has it's drawbacks. What drawbacks would exist for a Longevity list?

Here's part of the post from user WalterSobchak:

I think we need National Longevity not so much seniority. Just like Teaching. They all have different unions but you get credit for your years of service. So if you do get furloughed at Airline A you go to the bottom of the seniority list at Airline B, but start at the payscale for your corresponding year. National Seniority would be retarded. Are you going to go to some one else's airline and bump them down because they picked a better company than you did to start?
I was just on JetCareers
There was your first mistake.

National Longevity List in lieu of a National Seniority List. I have to say this makes good sense to me. What are the opinions on APC? Why hasn't this been pushed?
My opinion? Both options suck.
Led Zep is offline  
Old 06-13-2008, 07:01 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Senior Skipper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: the correct seat
Posts: 1,422
Default

I'm actually a little surprised about the less than enthusiastic responses.

Slice, you say they won't go for it. Of course I don't expect them to got for something that cuts into their bank accounts (who would), but wouldn't you agree that you have to fight for something if you really want it?

FlyJSH, I see what you're saying, but I doubt it'd be that bad. They'll eventually have to hire the qualified pilots at the rate they deserve. Think about it, if a hospital told a doctor fresh out of residency training that he'd have to accept wages and duty hours only marginally better than the miserable wages he's paid in residency, do you think they'd be able to get any doctors to work in that hospital?

Led Zep, why do both options suck?

Guys I'm trying to figure out why a longevity list would be bad. I can only see good right now. Is there something obvious that I'm missing here? It seems like something to push for. The profession has changed so much (for the worse) since 30 or so years ago, why not try to make a major change for the better?

I'm still only a private pilot right now, and I'm trying to understand why the airline guys seem so resigned to the idea of change.
Senior Skipper is offline  
Old 06-13-2008, 09:00 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,494
Default

It would work against those with many years in. Why would management hire a "new" guy at a 10 or 15 year payscale when you could get a qualified guy on 5 year pay? Would working at Mesa or somewhere similar for 10 years make someone that valuable as a newhire into widebody longhaul flying? Besides getting one group of pilots to agree on anything is near impossible, trying 20 or so pilot groups will never happen.
Rama is offline  
Old 06-14-2008, 02:17 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 440
Default

Originally Posted by Senior Skipper
I'm actually a little surprised about the less than enthusiastic responses.

Slice, you say they won't go for it. Of course I don't expect them to got for something that cuts into their bank accounts (who would), but wouldn't you agree that you have to fight for something if you really want it?

FlyJSH, I see what you're saying, but I doubt it'd be that bad. They'll eventually have to hire the qualified pilots at the rate they deserve. Think about it, if a hospital told a doctor fresh out of residency training that he'd have to accept wages and duty hours only marginally better than the miserable wages he's paid in residency, do you think they'd be able to get any doctors to work in that hospital?

Led Zep, why do both options suck?

Guys I'm trying to figure out why a longevity list would be bad. I can only see good right now. Is there something obvious that I'm missing here? It seems like something to push for. The profession has changed so much (for the worse) since 30 or so years ago, why not try to make a major change for the better?

I'm still only a private pilot right now, and I'm trying to understand why the airline guys seem so resigned to the idea of change.
Led Zep, why do both options suck?
O.K., I guess I could elaborate.

First, I'm not a fan of anything that has to do with ALPA. I have never been a part of ALPA, but from what I see as an outsider is nothing more than a large, over-bloated inefficient organization whose elected officials are more like career politicians than servants for the organization.

Second, and more to the point with a longevity list. The industry always has and always will be very competitive for jobs. It is all who you know in addition to what you know. It may not always be fair, but that is just the way it is. You cannot force a company to hire strictly from a particular list.

They'll eventually have to hire the qualified pilots at the rate they deserve.
You are paid what you negotiate, not what you think you deserve. Jetcareers' attitude is that "everyone is a winner". In the real world it is very much different.

Think about it, if a hospital told a doctor fresh out of residency training that he'd have to accept wages and duty hours only marginally better than the miserable wages he's paid in residency, do you think they'd be able to get any doctors to work in that hospital?
This comparison is apples-to-oranges in nature. First, doctors are not part of a union with a structured pay scale. Second, most doctors go into practice for themselves. Third, when a doctor is hired by a hospital, his or her salary is usually based on what the hospital and the physician agree on what that person's skills are worth. Good talent is hard to find, and most organizations are willing to pay top dollar for the best talent.

Pilots on the other hand are much different. Our "residency" is typically that time spent building hours and can be as little as a few months or last many years. The major difference between us and a residency program is that the residency is part of a doctor's required training and it is for a specified time frame.
Led Zep is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
Carl Spackler
Mergers and Acquisitions
495
06-28-2008 06:11 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM
SmoothOnTop
Major
11
04-21-2008 06:46 AM
HSLD
Major
224
07-18-2007 11:24 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices