Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Are U.S. airlines flying 40-year old planes? >

Are U.S. airlines flying 40-year old planes?

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Are U.S. airlines flying 40-year old planes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-31-2008, 11:51 AM
  #31  
No one's home
 
III Corps's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,091
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
III Corps:

While "dropping" from either a T-38 or an F-104 (TF-104? Star Trainer? Star Search?) would still be a letdown, the legend that the F-104 was a "Widowmaker" is mostly false.
A few years ago I spent a day with the guys doing flight test on the DO-328. Nice bunch of guys. They told the standard Luftwaffe jokes about the -104.

What do you call a -104 driver who quits smoking? An optimist.
How do you get your own -104 in Germany? Buy some farmland and in no time you will be on your way to accumulating one.

Germany (and other NATO countries) bought the Starfighter largely due to polical pressure (US) as well as some illegal bribing by Lockheed. (They got caught, too, but after the deal was done).

Initially, the jet had a horrible record--but only in Europe, mainly Germany. The reason was guys who were flying F-86s--or slower--jets/WW II prop-fighters were given short conversion courses. They came out of a lightly wing-loaded airplane to one with VERY high wing loading--not mentally ready to adapt. I see the same thing, every new-class, in the T-38.

When the Luftwaffe moved F-104 RTU to Luke AFB in Phoenix, the crashes went away.
Not all the story. The Luftwaffe was doing mods to the airplane that were not authorized by Lockheed and they were flying highspeed low-level in some of the worst wx and terrain in Europe.

I knew a few -104 guys and one worked with the Luftwaffe at Luke. He too said that in the vertical, he had a good time with the F-4s and the -104 was no grape when you used its energy correctly.

Ironically, when the T-38 entered service, it was considered "too easy" to fly. That is, it didn't adequately prepare students to transition into the Century-series fighters (F-100, F-101, F-102, F-104, -105, -106, and F-4 [originally called the F-110A]).

NOW the biggest complaint is it is the HARDEST airplane left in the Air Force to fly.
I have heard that.

I really enjoyed the -38. I had a great instructor (for a while) and we were the only base flying 3 solos and a dual in 4-ship which included close trail. Rejoins could be VERY exciting.

175+ fuel in the final turn.. 155+ fuel on final.. around 2800lbs for pattern entry at 280kts. I still remember almost 40yrs later.

Did they ever get the air conditioning system fixed so it wouldn't spit ice balls out the wemacs in hot humid weather?
III Corps is offline  
Old 04-01-2008, 12:20 PM
  #32  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default T-38-isms

Still spits ice--look for the famous video on Youtube of "Turn the Heat O-F-F!!" Some posts say it is an F-16, but it's a T-38C.

That happened at CBM about 3 years ago--I was there. The student was a Japanese National, and the IP's callsign was Satan. No kidding. He's since retired; rumor has it the video is used at FedEx for CRM training, and I think Satan is at AirTran.

The kid got his callsign a week later, including a Friday nametag. It actually said:

"O-F-F" (Hyphens included). I don't think he ever got it---"Lost in translation."

Now pattern entry is 300, and because they "improved" the jet (by making it heavier), final turn is 180+ Gas (usually start about 200 knots), and final is 160+gas (typically 170-175).

The kids won't ever fully-flare it, though. They usually scrape off rubber at 150+; I've gotten as slow as 121 kts at touchdown, but that is hanging on the blades and a whole lotta experience.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 04-01-2008, 05:30 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
daytonaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Jump
Posts: 276
Default

Yes, indeed, the launch date is why the MD-80 was so named. Also, the variants were named after their projected launch dates as well ie. MD-82, 83, 87, 88, etc. This trend ended with the MD-90 which actually showed up in 1989.
daytonaflyer is offline  
Old 04-01-2008, 06:12 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Luckydawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: -400 FO
Posts: 300
Default

Originally Posted by JayDee
I know several of AA MD80's are surplus from the TWA merger... So Um yea, I think that some of the planes are actually that old.

Pace airlines still flies old 737-200's the old hooter planes. Ah how disappointed I was to get on one of those and realise the FA was not a hooters girl... Infact she was far from it. ANd they didnt even have wings as an inflight option...

No MD80 is that old as previously noted. AA acquired MD82's and MD83's. TWA received some of the last MD80s built in the late 90's which would make them the youngest MD80s around. AA are still flying those. They kept the airplanes but didn't keep the employees and it became the most lopsided..... doh.. wooops .. I won't steal the thread
Luckydawg is offline  
Old 04-01-2008, 06:57 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: I pilot
Posts: 2,049
Default

I know that the 135 airframes and the B-52 airframes are old, but i was sitting on Maho Beach and saw a DC-3 come in, ok so it didn't have US registration but some places out there fly some really old airframes, and not for nostaligic purposes. Colombian Air Force has got some AC-47's, they modified some DC-3's with guns on them to make gunships, and i heard some of the tail numbers have history in the berlin airlift.
zondaracer is offline  
Old 04-01-2008, 09:20 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JayDee's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Student Pilot
Posts: 409
Default

Originally Posted by Luckydawg
No MD80 is that old as previously noted. AA acquired MD82's and MD83's. TWA received some of the last MD80s built in the late 90's which would make them the youngest MD80s around. AA are still flying those. They kept the airplanes but didn't keep the employees and it became the most lopsided..... doh.. wooops .. I won't steal the thread


I was merely making the point that if AA's planes were more or less left overs from the TWA merger, and those were 20+ years old, then it is fully possible that yes 40+ year old planes are still in commercial service. I never said that the 80 was 40 years old. I said I thought it was entirely possible that 40+ year old planes are pretty prevelant in commercial aviation today.

Sorry to start such a controversy.
JayDee is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 12:28 PM
  #37  
No one's home
 
III Corps's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,091
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
Still spits ice--look for the famous video on Youtube of "Turn the Heat O-F-F!!" Some posts say it is an F-16, but it's a T-38C.
I've seen this... funny, sad and very instructive. I worked with foreign nationals (if that is the term today) and there was a language barrier as well as cultural barriers It made for some very interesting and some unsafe flying

Now pattern entry is 300, and because they "improved" the jet (by making it heavier), final turn is 180+ Gas (usually start about 200 knots), and final is 160+gas (typically 170-175).

The kids won't ever fully-flare it, though. They usually scrape off rubber at 150+; I've gotten as slow as 121 kts at touchdown, but that is hanging on the blades and a whole lotta experience.
I understand the new intakes allow better takeoff performance, especially for hot high.

Why won't they flare?
III Corps is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 12:52 PM
  #38  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default T-38 Flaring

III Corps:

See this post/thread (somebody asked the same thing):

http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/sh...457#post353457
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 04:38 PM
  #39  
No one's home
 
III Corps's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,091
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
III Corps:

See this post/thread (somebody asked the same thing):

http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/sh...457#post353457
I guess things have changed a LOT. We used to ALWAYS pull to the at least moderate buffet in the pitch. You wuss around the pattern and someone was going to chew on you.

And yes, the x-box guys are something to work with. I have done some instructing in the Cirrus and it is a fabulous machine with incredible displays and myriad information but all that wonderful display just sucks them into the cockpit and they disregard the marvelous display OUT THE WINDOW. I was with one fellow.. we were about 15 miles north of the field on a blue sky-clear and a million day and when we get ready to RTB, he programs the Garmin with D. ???? It is as if it is just an all moving video game...
III Corps is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
UnlimitedAkro
Major
60
03-11-2008 12:14 PM
bhag
Regional
19
11-20-2007 05:32 PM
jelloy683
Major
4
08-13-2007 05:24 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-26-2005 11:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices