Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
US intercepts Russian Bomber >

US intercepts Russian Bomber

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

US intercepts Russian Bomber

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2008, 06:28 AM
  #11  
No one's home
 
III Corps's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,091
Talking

Originally Posted by reCALcitrant
They brought one of those pieces of **** to KBAD about 9 years ago. All the US aircrews got tours. Said it was the biggest pile of **** they've ever sat in. That's coming from a bunch of BUFF guys!! Should tell you something.
Why do you call it a piece of ****? Just because a few people who flew BUFs said it was? And what are you trying to say when you say the analysis comes from a bunch of BUF guys? That the BUF guys are at the bottom of the chain?

History does not reflect the crews' opinion and the machine appears to be capable of doing its assigned task. It has been around about as long as the BUF and is still cruising the skies. It has been modified about as many times as the BUF and is capable of carrying long range stand off missiles like the BUF.

I've been in a few Russian machines and simulators and the Russians just take a different approach to things. Their ADIs for example... instead of an inside out view like western ADIs, they take a god's eye view. And they often take a more utilitarian approach than the gold-plate (if one can call the cockpit of a BUF gold-plate ) From the videos, at least you can stand up in the Bear's cockpit, something you can not do in the BUF except when climbing from the EWO/Bomb-nav stations.

Over the years I have been privileged to fly many different machines from different countries. What I have found is all airplanes have strengths and weaknesses. You play to the strength and respect the weakness.

I wonder if the Bear crew got a look at the BUF and what their opinion of it was.
III Corps is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 06:33 AM
  #12  
No one's home
 
III Corps's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,091
Default

Originally Posted by MoosePileit
You might see something cool and even more current on the newer Russian routes above (north of) the jet stream this time of year- it may not be on your TCAS though...

Has Putin put Blackjacks up? Or the Backfire? No one is saying anything about them if so...

The Backfire has shown up at Paris and Farnborough a few times but not the Blackjack. The Backfire had TIGHT cockpit and earlier versions were not well liked by the crews due to the lack of space. The M apparently addressed some of those problems. But a nice looking machine that looks good loafing around the skies in France and England.
III Corps is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 06:59 AM
  #13  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,050
Talking

Ah, the good 'ol days...
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 02:30 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
reCALcitrant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 840
Default

Originally Posted by III Corps
Why do you call it a piece of ****? Just because a few people who flew BUFs said it was? And what are you trying to say when you say the analysis comes from a bunch of BUF guys? That the BUF guys are at the bottom of the chain?
History does not reflect the crews' opinion and the machine appears to be capable of doing its assigned task. It has been around about as long as the BUF and is still cruising the skies. It has been modified about as many times as the BUF and is capable of carrying long range stand off missiles like the BUF.

I've been in a few Russian machines and simulators and the Russians just take a different approach to things. Their ADIs for example... instead of an inside out view like western ADIs, they take a god's eye view. And they often take a more utilitarian approach than the gold-plate (if one can call the cockpit of a BUF gold-plate ) From the videos, at least you can stand up in the Bear's cockpit, something you can not do in the BUF except when climbing from the EWO/Bomb-nav stations.

Over the years I have been privileged to fly many different machines from different countries. What I have found is all airplanes have strengths and weaknesses. You play to the strength and respect the weakness.

I wonder if the Bear crew got a look at the BUF and what their opinion of it was.

Yes, I am saying that BUFF (not BUF) crews are at the bottom. Except for us reserve guys who hire straight into it, nobody chose the assignment. WE fly the almost the oldest pile of **** still releasing weapons. Notice I said we because I fly them. All that being said, I think the BUFF is very capable and I do have a sick love for the old thing. .10 mach faster that the bear (airframe up to D-model) and holds a ****load more different weapons. I won't even get into how many. Also, when a bunch of aircrew flying an old ass airplane like the Buff call something a peice of ****...it's probably a peice of ****. The mighty B-52 is circling the skies of Afghanistan and Iraq tonight killing bad guys while the bear is sitting in some hangar getting its props (hehe) balanced. Oh BTW, we won the cold war. Er go (wow latin from a BUFF pilot) we can call it a peice of ****.
reCALcitrant is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 03:11 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Spartan
Posts: 3,652
Default

Originally Posted by reCALcitrant
Yes, I am saying that BUFF (not BUF) crews are at the bottom. Except for us reserve guys who hire straight into it, nobody chose the assignment. WE fly the almost the oldest pile of **** still releasing weapons. Notice I said we because I fly them. All that being said, I think the BUFF is very capable and I do have a sick love for the old thing. .10 mach faster that the bear (airframe up to D-model) and holds a ****load more different weapons. I won't even get into how many. Also, when a bunch of aircrew flying an old ass airplane like the Buff call something a peice of ****...it's probably a peice of ****. The mighty B-52 is circling the skies of Afghanistan and Iraq tonight killing bad guys while the bear is sitting in some hangar getting its props (hehe) balanced. Oh BTW, we won the cold war. Er go (wow latin from a BUFF pilot) we can call it a peice of ****.
i before e except after c.
peace out.
Slice is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 06:54 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 50
Default

i dont understand why the fighters let the bear get so close to the carrier????
isnt that a threat or a hostile act? i bet if a US aircraft flew over a russian warship with thousands of lives at stake they would have shot it down. can someone please explain...
wordfromthewise is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 11:30 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LineTroll's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 151
Default

Shoot it down and start a war, or let them fly over the ship... You pick.
LineTroll is offline  
Old 02-14-2008, 05:33 AM
  #18  
No one's home
 
III Corps's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,091
Default

Originally Posted by reCALcitrant
Yes, I am saying that BUFF (not BUF) crews are at the bottom. Except for us reserve guys who hire straight into it, nobody chose the assignment. WE fly the almost the oldest pile of **** still releasing weapons. Notice I said we because I fly them. All that being said, I think the BUFF is very capable and I do have a sick love for the old thing. .10 mach faster that the bear (airframe up to D-model) and holds a ****load more different weapons. I won't even get into how many. Also, when a bunch of aircrew flying an old ass airplane like the Buff call something a peice of ****...it's probably a peice of ****. The mighty B-52 is circling the skies of Afghanistan and Iraq tonight killing bad guys while the bear is sitting in some hangar getting its props (hehe) balanced. Oh BTW, we won the cold war. Er go (wow latin from a BUFF pilot) we can call it a peice of ****.
I know the BUF (leaving out F for fat and just going with the guts of the slur) since long ago I was exiled to SAC for a long 4yr period. I refueled them and even got to fly an H a couple of times. It is indeed an excellent machine. And it seems history repeats itself with the BUF crews being looked down upon. We created a Mason Williams song called Commie Bombers with the final line of "How to be a commie bomber, its just a curse... to be SACs finest just be ATC's worst." It got lots of laughs.

And I was around for all the jokes about the 'dreaded 7 engine approach' and that DFCs or at least Air Medals were in the crew meals out of U-Tapao while the fighters were going north. Everyone stopped laughing when the BUFs went north and the crews flew into the teeth of the NV defenses without all the jinking. Huge ones to do that... and repeatedly the BUF has accomplished its mission.

And yes, we did win the cold war but the Bear is rousing again and we would be foolish not to take notice, old Tu-95s or not.

You out of Barksdale? Went in there more than a few times with the 'water wagon'. Have you been sentenced to Diego Garcia? One place I missed.

(oh, I think it is 'ergo'.. one word unless one is confused and is thinking about the V1 abort thread where you hit V1, ask the other guy what he wants to do and he says, "Er.... go?")

III Corps.. former 'tanker toad'
III Corps is offline  
Old 02-14-2008, 11:40 AM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 50
Default

Originally Posted by LineTroll
Shoot it down and start a war, or let them fly over the ship... You pick.
ya i guess, thats gotta be nuts though. sittin on the carrier watching a russian bomber fly over. i bet those hornets had their missiles locked and ready to go
wordfromthewise is offline  
Old 02-14-2008, 11:46 AM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 33
Default

Wow interesting story
AirTahoe is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sioux39
Foreign
8
09-23-2007 11:42 AM
Zoot Suit
Hangar Talk
1
08-10-2007 05:36 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
4
07-30-2007 07:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices