Ukraine conflict
#721
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,466
2 interesting points today:
1st patriot intercept was reported to be in defense of itself. Its in kyiv apparently.
Gains around bahkmut threaten encirclement of wagner. However both ukraine and US military personnel are stating that these are still defensive in nature to “shape” the battlefield for future offensives.
1st patriot intercept was reported to be in defense of itself. Its in kyiv apparently.
Gains around bahkmut threaten encirclement of wagner. However both ukraine and US military personnel are stating that these are still defensive in nature to “shape” the battlefield for future offensives.
#722
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,466
As of yet unsubstantiated rumors indicate the patriot was damaged by the new hypersonic cruise missle.
russia is assessed to not have any more offensive ability this season
the ukranians are waiting for the mud to dry
russia is assessed to not have any more offensive ability this season
the ukranians are waiting for the mud to dry
#724
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,466
#725
The US, I believe, has provided only one (1) Patriot battery. But a Patriot Battery has multiple parts:
I haven’t the vaguest idea what part the Russian missile may (or may not) have hit, the usual target is the targeting radar, but a single battery is usually deployed in a regional air defense role.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ericteg...a-gamechanger/
If the Russians are actually TARGETTING the Patriot battery with Kinzhal missiles they are using $4 million missiles to try to destroy a $1.1 Billion battery while the battery is using $4-6 million missiles (depending upon which PAC missile they are firing) to defend against the $4 billion missile.
A lot of this - as the Forbes article indicates) appears to be more symbolic support of the Ukraine than anything else. It is unlikely to be any sort of a game changer in and of iytself, merely replacing the Ukraine’s now depleted supplies of other missiles.
Each Patriot battery consists of a truck-mounted launching system with eight launchers that can hold up to four missile interceptors each, a ground radar, a control station and a generator. The Army said it currently has 16 Patriot battalions. A 2018 International Institute for Strategic Studies report found those battalions operate 50 batteries, which have more than 1,200 missile interceptors.
I haven’t the vaguest idea what part the Russian missile may (or may not) have hit, the usual target is the targeting radar, but a single battery is usually deployed in a regional air defense role.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ericteg...a-gamechanger/
If the Russians are actually TARGETTING the Patriot battery with Kinzhal missiles they are using $4 million missiles to try to destroy a $1.1 Billion battery while the battery is using $4-6 million missiles (depending upon which PAC missile they are firing) to defend against the $4 billion missile.
A lot of this - as the Forbes article indicates) appears to be more symbolic support of the Ukraine than anything else. It is unlikely to be any sort of a game changer in and of iytself, merely replacing the Ukraine’s now depleted supplies of other missiles.
#726
CNN reports:
Ukraine has received at least two Patriot systems, one from the United States and one from Germany, to enhance its air defenses, which have previously been unable to intercept more modern Russian missiles such as the Kinzhal.
Ukraine has received at least two Patriot systems, one from the United States and one from Germany, to enhance its air defenses, which have previously been unable to intercept more modern Russian missiles such as the Kinzhal.
#727
Kinzhal costs way more than $4M, at least $10M but IIRC that relied on western components. So who knows what the cost to replace inventory is now.
Kinzhal, as I've said before, is not a "hypersonic weapon" in the context of new technology that everybody likes to get excited about these days. It is simply an air-launched short-range ballistic missile. Pretty much all BM's go hypersonic on the way back down. That's WW-II technology (German V-2).
What Kinzhal does have going for it is that by virtue of being air-launched it can in theory be a multi-axis threat, and many air defense systems are limited to a specific sector or axis. This includes patriot but a quick glance at the battle-field geometry shows that the air launch sector available to RU isn't 360 degrees unless they launch from other countries' airspace.
While an anti-radiation missile normally guides on the radar emitter I do not recall that kinzhal has that type of seeker. IIRC it's old-school inertial to video terminal guidance, presumably with GPS updating. That's not useful for targeting a mobile tactical target unless you know precisely where it is at time of launch. It's possible to do that with intel systems or even HUMINT.
#728
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,466
The US, I believe, has provided only one (1) Patriot battery. But a Patriot Battery has multiple parts:
I haven’t the vaguest idea what part the Russian missile may (or may not) have hit, the usual target is the targeting radar, but a single battery is usually deployed in a regional air defense role.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ericteg...a-gamechanger/
If the Russians are actually TARGETTING the Patriot battery with Kinzhal missiles they are using $4 million missiles to try to destroy a $1.1 Billion battery while the battery is using $4-6 million missiles (depending upon which PAC missile they are firing) to defend against the $4 billion missile.
A lot of this - as the Forbes article indicates) appears to be more symbolic support of the Ukraine than anything else. It is unlikely to be any sort of a game changer in and of iytself, merely replacing the Ukraine’s now depleted supplies of other missiles.
I haven’t the vaguest idea what part the Russian missile may (or may not) have hit, the usual target is the targeting radar, but a single battery is usually deployed in a regional air defense role.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ericteg...a-gamechanger/
If the Russians are actually TARGETTING the Patriot battery with Kinzhal missiles they are using $4 million missiles to try to destroy a $1.1 Billion battery while the battery is using $4-6 million missiles (depending upon which PAC missile they are firing) to defend against the $4 billion missile.
A lot of this - as the Forbes article indicates) appears to be more symbolic support of the Ukraine than anything else. It is unlikely to be any sort of a game changer in and of iytself, merely replacing the Ukraine’s now depleted supplies of other missiles.
1. The west has more resources so the “cost” per unit is not equivalent
2. It is an active and effective part of the ukranian IADS. The radar system alone is a very capable early warning system.
3. The psychological impact of having 2 patriots in theater will impact russian planning cells targeting matrix.
4. if pushed up they will create a no fly zone over the ukrainian forces (if they haven’t already), once they are comfortable with how to operate them.
symbolic is not appropriate IMO, as this system is a very capable elint machine, early warning system, and airspace denial.
Think it all the way through both strategically and tactically. One patriot battery radar is worth its weight in gold, much less 2
#729
#730
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,466
They have at least those two. Possibly more.
Kinzhal costs way more than $4M, at least $10M but IIRC that relied on western components. So who knows what the cost to replace inventory is now.
Kinzhal, as I've said before, is not a "hypersonic weapon" in the context of new technology that everybody likes to get excited about these days. It is simply an air-launched short-range ballistic missile. Pretty much all BM's go hypersonic on the way back down. That's WW-II technology (German V-2).
What Kinzhal does have going for it is that by virtue of being air-launched it can in theory be a multi-axis threat, and many air defense systems are limited to a specific sector or axis. This includes patriot but a quick glance at the battle-field geometry shows that the air launch sector available to RU isn't 360 degrees unless they launch from other countries' airspace.
While an anti-radiation missile normally guides on the radar emitter I do not recall that kinzhal has that type of seeker. IIRC it's old-school inertial to video terminal guidance, presumably with GPS updating. That's not useful for targeting a mobile tactical target unless you know precisely where it is at time of launch. It's possible to do that with intel systems or even HUMINT.
Kinzhal costs way more than $4M, at least $10M but IIRC that relied on western components. So who knows what the cost to replace inventory is now.
Kinzhal, as I've said before, is not a "hypersonic weapon" in the context of new technology that everybody likes to get excited about these days. It is simply an air-launched short-range ballistic missile. Pretty much all BM's go hypersonic on the way back down. That's WW-II technology (German V-2).
What Kinzhal does have going for it is that by virtue of being air-launched it can in theory be a multi-axis threat, and many air defense systems are limited to a specific sector or axis. This includes patriot but a quick glance at the battle-field geometry shows that the air launch sector available to RU isn't 360 degrees unless they launch from other countries' airspace.
While an anti-radiation missile normally guides on the radar emitter I do not recall that kinzhal has that type of seeker. IIRC it's old-school inertial to video terminal guidance, presumably with GPS updating. That's not useful for targeting a mobile tactical target unless you know precisely where it is at time of launch. It's possible to do that with intel systems or even HUMINT.
i remember when i was stationed at osan, you could see all the patriots sitting out there. They really harped on making sure your IFF was up and running on the RTB from REALLY far out out. That was 15 years ago. Im sure things have only gotten more advanced (pending which missile we gave ukraine of course).
i in no way have clarity of truth, but the russians are in complete disarray around bahkmut if you read all the conflicting reports from their MoD and wagner. Maybe its all bull rap, but me thinks the ukranians are going to go for it soon.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post