Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Ukraine conflict

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-2024, 08:53 PM
  #2441  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,112
Default

Originally Posted by ReluctantEskimo
You fail to extrapolate what happens after the Ukrainians lay down their arms.

Roses and sunshine? Do tell. Since you are so well-versed in statecraft, tell me what Russian-occupied Ukraine looks like.
Pretty much like what was agreed upon in Minsk II, if the negotiations start quickly.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/what-are-minsk-agreements-ukraine-conflict-2022-02-21
/

if not it will depend upon what leverage Ukraine has for negotiations. It isn't simply weapons, they actually DO need the extra 500,000 troops their recently deposed Chief of Staff was requesting, but the political will isn't there to conscript that heavily. They need more boots on the ground AND THE TIME TO TRAIN THEM (or someone else's already trained troops) - not just more arms and ammo.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 03-03-2024, 08:56 PM
  #2442  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,112
Default

Originally Posted by ReluctantEskimo
You and METO need to have a gathering. You're bordering on his level of incoherence.

All I can (barely) read from your comments is that you have nothing good to say about America's foreign policy for the last 100 years. We've done nothing right, and in your eyes, we should go home ashamed of ourselves.

Is that right?
STRAWMAN

I gave specific examples to refute YOUR CLAIM that we "can shape world policy" and you are now trying to change the argument to "nothing good to say about American policy for the last hundred years. That's Sophistry of the first order. You should be ashamed
Excargodog is offline  
Old 03-03-2024, 09:01 PM
  #2443  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2023
Posts: 698
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
STRAWMAN

I gave specific examples to refute YOUR CLAIM that we "can shape world policy" and you are now trying to change the argument to "nothing good to say about American policy for the last hundred years. That's Sophistry of the first order. You should be ashamed
Hardly. Then what was the point of bringing up all of the collateral damage of American foreign policy? Because surely it's America's fault that Hamas invaded a music festival. At least, that's what I can infer by your comments.
ReluctantEskimo is offline  
Old 03-03-2024, 09:02 PM
  #2444  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,828
Default

Originally Posted by Hubcapped
Lol, once again you are trying too hard, and I have no idea what you are saying.
Maybe try and tone back your pretentious ramblings
Interest, money & time, each running quickly out on a hands tied slog with no end in sight. These are facts. Wail, jive, lolz with all your strength, minds don’t change without factual motives. You, Major coherent, offer check to check voters not one damn thing but more hubcrap. No dice 'bruh'
METO Guido is offline  
Old 03-04-2024, 06:01 AM
  #2445  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,112
Default

Originally Posted by ReluctantEskimo
Hardly. Then what was the point of bringing up all of the collateral damage of American foreign policy? Because surely it's America's fault that Hamas invaded a music festival. At least, that's what I can infer by your comments.
In that case you lack the capacity to understand simple arguments. That's your problem, not mine. Those things weren't "collateral damage of American foreign policy' those were examples of INABILITY TO "shape world policy." It ain't the same thing.



No, what you SHOULD infer from my comments is that the US DOES NOT "shape world policy and only a fool would believe we do. We can at times AFFECT policies at certain times and certain places but we do not and have never had the omnipotence to have "shaped" world policy and only someone totally lacking an understanding of history would believe that we have.

It's a huge world with billions of people all of whom are sort of like fleas on an elephant's @ss. You apparently think you (or by extension the US) are the mahout, but so do millions of other fleas from other countries.

Hell, random factors alone keep anyone from "shaping world policy" (who wanted COVID 19 to happen?) but as they say in War College, the enemy also gets a vote. You are a fool if you think otherwise.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 03-04-2024, 06:38 AM
  #2446  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,112
Default

https://www.politico.eu/article/ukra...-taurus-scalp/

Under fire: France insists it’s no slacker on military aid to Ukraine

Berlin has accused Paris of not pulling its weight on helping Ukraine. France begs to differ.
That would actually be, Au Contraire...

Some excerpts:
Accused by Germany of not pulling its weight on aid to Ukraine, France struck back over the weekend by publishing for the first time a list of the military kit delivered to Kyiv between the start of the war and December 31.

According to the French, their military aid is worth €2.6 billion, much more than the meager €635 million calculated by the Kiel Institute, a German think tank that compiles an authoritative list of which country is pledging what to Ukraine. That index shows Germany is far and away the biggest European military aid donor to Ukraine — promising €17.7 billion.

French arms deliveries have been the focus of a growing rift between Paris and Berlin, with German officials publicly voicing frustration with France's smaller military aid. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has repeatedly called for an audit of national contributions amid discussion on how to calibrate an EU fund for reimbursing countries for their military donations to Kyiv.

French President Emmanuel Macron’s suggestion last week that Western troops might be deployed to Ukraine has deepeneddisagreements between the two countries.

French officials meanwhile privately express frustration that Germany is refusing to send its Taurus long-range cruise missiles, something that would match France and the U.K., which have handed over their similar SCALP and Storm Shadow missiles.

Challenging Kiel

French officials including Lecornu have long been critical of the Kiel Institute’s methodology, arguing that the German organization uses pledges and not actual deliveries to calculate countries’ contributions. Last week, the French armed forces minister told lawmakers he’s encouraging French think tanks to come up with their own rankings.

There's also a question of how many aid promises are actually fulfilled.

Half of the West’s commitments on military gear don’t arrive in time, Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov complained last month, giving weight to France's claim that there’s a difference between words and deeds.

​​​​​​​
Excargodog is offline  
Old 03-04-2024, 08:05 AM
  #2447  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,437
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido
Interest, money & time, each running quickly out on a hands tied slog with no end in sight. These are facts. Wail, jive, lolz with all your strength, minds don’t change without factual motives. You, Major coherent, offer check to check voters not one damn thing but more hubcrap. No dice 'bruh'
wtf are you saying?

Honest question, can anyone translate this?
Hubcapped is offline  
Old 03-04-2024, 08:06 AM
  #2448  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,437
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
In that case you lack the capacity to understand simple arguments. That's your problem, not mine. Those things weren't "collateral damage of American foreign policy' those were examples of INABILITY TO "shape world policy." It ain't the same thing.



No, what you SHOULD infer from my comments is that the US DOES NOT "shape world policy and only a fool would believe we do. We can at times AFFECT policies at certain times and certain places but we do not and have never had the omnipotence to have "shaped" world policy and only someone totally lacking an understanding of history would believe that we have.

It's a huge world with billions of people all of whom are sort of like fleas on an elephant's @ss. You apparently think you (or by extension the US) are the mahout, but so do millions of other fleas from other countries.

Hell, random factors alone keep anyone from "shaping world policy" (who wanted COVID 19 to happen?) but as they say in War College, the enemy also gets a vote. You are a fool if you think otherwise.
are you really inferring that the US has not been shaping word world policy since the Yalta conference?

winning the cold war ring a bell? I know its hard for an extremist like you to understand, but the GOP used to be my party of choice when they focused on foreign policy and not arguing with scientists or using the survival of a democratic country as leverage for votes……

Only a moron would take some failures to mean that there haven’t been successes. Come on man, at least be intellectually, honest with what you’re talking about.
Hubcapped is offline  
Old 03-04-2024, 09:41 AM
  #2449  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,828
Default

Originally Posted by Hubcapped
wtf are you saying?

Honest question, can anyone translate this?
Means Ur busy pi&&ing up a rope?? In addition to insult strafing bb's.

As so coherently mentioned, this is internet turf. Stepped into it as middle age rambler. But I am what I am here, there & everywhere. Tough keyboard 0-4s ought be assigned next of kin detail. See how far that lol of yours gets past the doorbell.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 03-04-2024, 12:58 PM
  #2450  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,112
Default

Originally Posted by Hubcapped
are you really inferring that the US has not been shaping word world policy since the Yalta conference?

Only a moron would take some failures to mean that there haven’t been successes. Come on man, at least be intellectually, honest with what you’re talking about.
STRAWMAN ARGUMENT and even at that bereft of statistical validity.

"you win some, you lose some" is indicative of flipping a coin and calling "heads", not indicative of "shaping word world policy since the Yalta conference." Only a moron would think that.
Excargodog is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boeing Aviator
United
18
03-22-2022 11:04 AM
decrabbitz
FedEx
8
09-18-2021 10:22 PM
HerkDriver
Cargo
5
09-18-2007 01:56 PM
DiamondZ
Cargo
16
03-22-2007 10:38 AM
RockBottom
Hangar Talk
0
08-22-2006 07:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices