Ukraine conflict
#231
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,902
That’s it, I’m buying Meto a roller brush. The US is failing to accept its many limitations in decisions critical to security at home and abroad. While camps of homeless roam our cities behind shopping carts, we go on deploying troops, gifting arms & approving massive financial aid packages to scores of causes/countries as if those actions have no consequence beyond this year’s W2. One of the 1st things a pilot commits to memory when learning to operate an aircraft are its limitations. If you’ve taken any time at all to consider the attached charts, graphs and SME commentary posted on just these forum pages, it’s disingenuous not to acknowledge we’re running this baby at max EPR, all of the time. There is no margin for yet another WAR.
Hi Hub?
Hi Hub?
#233
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,466
Hi Hub,
A number of years ago I watched a movie titled "Babette's Feast". There was a scene in it where people who shared in a religious sect of some sort (Christian variety) were sitting around a table remembering quotes from the sects founder. Anyone with some familiarity with Evangelical or "New Age" denominations would have recognized the gist of them. The problem would be that for any outsider listening, it would have come across as superficial gibberish...no context and non-sequiturs. (which of course was the joke).
Sometimes when I read some posts on APC it reminds me of both that movie's scene and the old Fire Sign Theater comedy albums. If one doesn't know the reference, the points don't make much sense.
A number of years ago I watched a movie titled "Babette's Feast". There was a scene in it where people who shared in a religious sect of some sort (Christian variety) were sitting around a table remembering quotes from the sects founder. Anyone with some familiarity with Evangelical or "New Age" denominations would have recognized the gist of them. The problem would be that for any outsider listening, it would have come across as superficial gibberish...no context and non-sequiturs. (which of course was the joke).
Sometimes when I read some posts on APC it reminds me of both that movie's scene and the old Fire Sign Theater comedy albums. If one doesn't know the reference, the points don't make much sense.
To meto , sorry man, I’m not that smart to keep up with the inside commentary, I know my limits 😂. I flew fighters, have a passion for, and a degree emphasizing in, WW2. I read a lot of military non fiction. That’s about it.
I hear you in the domestic front and in a perfect world we would be able to clean that up. But RU invading ex soviet states must be stopped at all costs. For a myriad of reasons.
Logistically I believe if the Ukrainians got 30 M1s, 100 2a4s, and the refurbished t72s we will see some interesting maneuver warfare after the spring mud dries. Bahkmut gloc is still intact
#234
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,902
Ahh, ok copy. That makes sense. I truly wasn’t trying to be mean or anything, I just genuinely thought he may be from a foreign country where English isn’t his first language.
I flew fighters, have a passion for, and a degree emphasizing in, WW2. I read a lot of military non fiction.
I hear you in the domestic front and in a perfect world we would be able to clean that
I flew fighters, have a passion for, and a degree emphasizing in, WW2. I read a lot of military non fiction.
I hear you in the domestic front and in a perfect world we would be able to clean that
#235
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,902
#236
But win, lose, or draw, this has put paid to nuclear nonproliferation. The Ukraine GAVE UP their nukes for diplomatic promises. Granted, it wasn’t THIS Ukrainian government, but at the demise of the Soviet Union Ukraine sort of became the worlds third most nuclear armed nation. But the diplomats on both sides gave them assurances and they gave up those weapons.
NO ONE will ever fall for that ploy again, That unfortunately includes Iran, North Korea, Pakistan, and - no doubt - a number of other nations that are nuclear capable or will soon become so.
#237
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,902
The longer this plays out, the greater the chance that this evolves into the only type of fight in which Russia is still a world power.
But win, lose, or draw, this has put paid to nuclear nonproliferation. The Ukraine GAVE UP their nukes for diplomatic promises. Granted, it wasn’t THIS Ukrainian government, but at the demise of the Soviet Union Ukraine sort of became the worlds third most nuclear armed nation. But the diplomats on both sides gave them assurances and they gave up those weapons.
NO ONE will ever fall for that ploy again, That unfortunately includes Iran, North Korea, Pakistan, and - no doubt - a number of other nations that are nuclear capable or will soon become so.
But win, lose, or draw, this has put paid to nuclear nonproliferation. The Ukraine GAVE UP their nukes for diplomatic promises. Granted, it wasn’t THIS Ukrainian government, but at the demise of the Soviet Union Ukraine sort of became the worlds third most nuclear armed nation. But the diplomats on both sides gave them assurances and they gave up those weapons.
NO ONE will ever fall for that ploy again, That unfortunately includes Iran, North Korea, Pakistan, and - no doubt - a number of other nations that are nuclear capable or will soon become so.
#238
I thought that too. Also thought that Meto is smarter than the rest of us and that we're just missing some of what he's trying to say.
#239
#240
My guess is that if Vlad used tac nukes in UR, he'd get what he wanted... the west would back off, and the inevitable bloody insurgency would be sending russian boys home in body bags for years to come.
I'm confident that we will not push into nuclear brinksmanship following a RU tactical first use. Not worth it.
And most of the rest of the world would sanction and isolate him like nothing we've seen before, including most of his "friends" and neutrals. Also the dirty-tricks departments of various countries' national security enterprises would be off their leashes... key regime people might start turning up dead, key infrastructure having "accidents", RU submarines vanishing with no trace, western black operators in both UR and RU etc, etc. If he goes big, we'd go asymmetric.
Vlad's own people would then "take care" of him soon enough, so they could blame the whole mess on him and promise it won't happen again. Vlad must know that (probably), and that's not how he wants to finish out his career.
But win, lose, or draw, this has put paid to nuclear nonproliferation. The Ukraine GAVE UP their nukes for diplomatic promises. Granted, it wasn’t THIS Ukrainian government, but at the demise of the Soviet Union Ukraine sort of became the worlds third most nuclear armed nation. But the diplomats on both sides gave them assurances and they gave up those weapons.
NO ONE will ever fall for that ploy again, That unfortunately includes Iran, North Korea, Pakistan, and - no doubt - a number of other nations that are nuclear capable or will soon become so.
NO ONE will ever fall for that ploy again, That unfortunately includes Iran, North Korea, Pakistan, and - no doubt - a number of other nations that are nuclear capable or will soon become so.
Hopefully any future proliferation-minded nations will adopt the Iran model... perpetually working towards the finish line but never quite getting there. Avoids the worst of the sanctions, and also avoids awkward consequences like an IL first strike. It would be difficult for IL to deliver sufficiently large *conventional* bunker-busters...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post