Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Ukraine conflict

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2024, 08:24 AM
  #2071  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,252
Default I think Socialists run our State Department

They are forever pushing sanctions as if they don't understand Capitalism at all.

it's a fundamental tenet that voluntary market transactions (which sort of excludes selling OxyContin to addicts) occur because both sides believe they benefit from the transaction. Which gets us to the downside of sanctions.




German economy dodges recession despite shrinking 0.3% in 2023

By Maria Martinez
January 15, 20248:34 AM PSTUpdated 7 days ago




BERLIN, Jan 15 (Reuters) - The German economy contracted in 2023, due to persistent inflation, high energy prices and weak foreign demand, but it avoided a recession at the end of the year.
Gross domestic product (GDP) shrank by 0.3% over the full-year 2023, the Federal Statistics Office said on Monday.
"Overall economic development faltered in Germany in 2023 in an environment that continues to be marked by multiple crises", said Ruth Brand, president of the statistics office, on Monday in Berlin.
Germanyover the last 20 years had the strongest economy in Europe. They built things. And because if the availability of relatively cheap energy - a lot of it from Russia - their economy prospered and they were the "economic stringmam of Europe" helping to offset the weaker economies of southern Europe. But sanctions are a two edged sword that have cut deep into the German economy. Russia's economy is actually growing at a faster rate than Germany's economy right now.

Oh, the State Department tried to finesse this situation by allowing the sale of Russian oil to Europe, but capping the price at $60 a barrel but the market for oil is a worldwide one - not controlled by the US State Department so right now that oil is flowing east to India, China, and SE Asia, and still going to EU countries that have no other practical source that have been exempted from the ban as well as Russian oil imported back into the EU from other countries that buy it, refine it, and sort of "money launder" it to get around the sanctions.

https://energyandcleanair.org/july-2...0was%20the,%25)%20and%20Turkey%20(3%25).

Ultimately, Capitalism is more potent than the US State Department.

But what is also needed is to look at the unintended consequences of the economic downturn in Germany (and to an extent the rest of Western Europe as well).

Recall that the events leading to WW2 involved the economic collapse of the Weimar Republic and the rise of the right wing in reaction to the poor economy and we are seeing that start already in Europe, certainly in Germany with the rising power of the AfD

https://www.npr.org/2023/10/07/12044...-in-government

but also in the Netherlands

https://apnews.com/article/democracy...bab4749fae7ee6

Slovakia

https://www.france24.com/en/europe/2...-right-parties

Hungary

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ald-trump-cpac

H€ , even in the U.K.

Sanctions are a two edged sword.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 01-22-2024, 02:04 PM
  #2072  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,466
Default

Originally Posted by Lowslung
Again, Russia started this war with a vastly superior force. The Ukrainians had a few tired MiGs & Flankers, and a handful of Frogfoots. The Russians have produced some very advanced aircraft over the last decades (or at least that's what they'd like the world & their export customers to believe), and have a massive numerical advantage over the Ukrainian Air Force. They should've had air supremacy on day one. It's shocking that they couldn't achieve control of the skies within a matter of weeks, much less years. The fact that the Ukrainians can still deny access to their airspace is nothing short of a miracle.
faip-03-08
luke08-09
osan 9-10
hill-10-14

my buddies that stayed in told me its a complete sh1t show. No integration, no sead, red on red, and sortie count dropped off within the first month due to tempo.

imo ukranian iads have carried the day thus far, only in that US CAS/SCAR would have completely buried the front line in 500 and 2000 pounders.

there are obviously many facets to “carrying the day” but if you’re having lgbs raining down on you……not much can be done from a ground pounder’s perspective
Hubcapped is offline  
Old 01-22-2024, 06:18 PM
  #2073  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Position: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Posts: 2,323
Default

Whatever happened to the Ukraine F-16 training/donation/deployment plan?

Smart minds would hope that those "in the know" would keep their G-D mouths shut. Challenge level: Impossible (for politicians).

"How do you know American's F-16's are being used in Ukraine? Don't worry, they'll tell you." Wingman - I can't believe I read this as a youth. This airframe is ancient.

If they go active, or have been active, I don't ever want to know. (I mean, they're doomed, but "from hell's heart, I stab at thee...I spit my last breath at thee", no?) Let them cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war while they can. Dying as a bad-arse is pretty cool. War is pretty cool. (To young, easily manipulated, young men, anyhoo.) Idiots/Awesomeness. "The Charge of the Light Brigade" isn't remembered for it's military effectiveness.

Russia wins some, from time to time. Albania. Bulgaria. Czechoslovakia. East Germany. Hungary. Poland. Romania. Yugoslavia. Game of Thrones, client states, Game of Thrones. Ebb and flow, the Great Game, etc.

Russia's been around much longer than the current North American polity though. Really have taken it in the shorts during the Mongolian invasion, the Swedish Invasion, the French invasion (Napoleon), the German invasion (H man), the Japanese, WWI, etc. etc. These guys get invaded alot. Maybe they're a bit sensitive about strong powers on their borders DEMANDING THEIR DESTRUCTION? They're still here though. With nukes.

IDK. I just read here, occasionally. (the Soviets were garbage though. F them.)

Last edited by DeltaboundRedux; 01-22-2024 at 06:38 PM.
DeltaboundRedux is offline  
Old 01-22-2024, 08:37 PM
  #2074  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,252
Default Worth a read…

https://kyivindependent.com/f-16s-fo...t-can-they-do/
Excargodog is offline  
Old 01-23-2024, 08:51 AM
  #2075  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,252
Default

https://cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/GCSTSFR2LVM6NLQLRRDHY5A7HM.jpgEuropean Union flags fly outside the European Commission headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, March 1, 2023.REUTERS/Johanna Geron/File Photo Acquire Licensing Rights, opens new tab
  • Summary
  • EU officials deem seizing Russian assets legally risky
  • Moscow has vowed to retaliate by seizing Western assets
  • EU officials worry any confiscation could hurt euro assets

BRUSSELS, Jan 23 (Reuters) - The European Union is unlikely to confiscate Russian central bank assets frozen in Europe, despite G7 plans to discuss the legality of such a move at a meeting in February, senior EU officials said.
The EU, United States, Japan and Canada froze some $300 billion of Russian central bank assetsin 2022 when Russia invaded Ukraine. Some $200 billion of that is held in Europe, mainly in the Belgian clearing house Euroclear.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe...ls-2024-01-23/

An excerpt:


​​​​​​​

IMPACT ON EURO

European officials are concerned not only with the legality of such an unprecedented confiscation of sovereign assets, but also with the potential consequences for the euro currency; investors might pull out of euro assets out of concern their money might one day be seized too.
In addition, Moscow has pledged it would retaliate by confiscating Western assets in Russia, which some reports put at $288 billion.
Belgian Finance Minister Vincent van Peteghem, whose country holds the rotating presidency of the EU until July, is very reticent on the possibility of confiscating the Russian assets.
"We need to be very prudent with that proposition. I think that it's important that what can come on the table should be legally sound and we should avoid any impact on financial stability," he told reporters on Tuesday.
Belgium's Euroclear has "substantial" amounts of assets in Russia, officials said, which could be seized by Moscow in what could pose a financial stability risk to the clearing house, with major repercussions.
"The EU cannot bail out Euroclear," another senior official said. "Euroclear manages trillions and its bankruptcy would be far more than the budget of the EU. We have to balance risk and profit," the official said.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 01-24-2024, 08:11 PM
  #2076  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
Whatever happened to the Ukraine F-16 training/donation/deployment plan?

Smart minds would hope that those "in the know" would keep their G-D mouths shut. Challenge level: Impossible (for politicians).

"How do you know American's F-16's are being used in Ukraine? Don't worry, they'll tell you." Wingman - I can't believe I read this as a youth. This airframe is ancient.

Russia's been around much longer than the current North American polity though. Really have taken it in the shorts during the Mongolian invasion, the Swedish Invasion, the French invasion (Napoleon), the German invasion (H man), the Japanese, WWI, etc. etc. These guys get invaded alot. Maybe they're a bit sensitive about strong powers on their borders DEMANDING THEIR DESTRUCTION? They're still here though. With nukes.

IDK. I just read here, occasionally. (the Soviets were garbage though. F them.)
If ordering up MASS murder for cold self-interest is still a thing, there be several challengers for the belt. Unfortunately, there remains only one, tattooed, overfed, aging quickly former heavyweight contender answering the bell. The only one left who might have a shot to stop them more the point. Will that be part of the say come Nov? Clearly. In for a pence, in for a pound. Fix the lighter.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 01-25-2024, 06:25 AM
  #2077  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,252
Default A good synopsis of the effects of…

...long term fecklessness.

https://www.politico.eu/article/euro...ladimir-putin/

Some excerpts:

To prepare for the worst, European countries need to “spend, spend, spend,” according to Gesine Weber, a research fellow at the German Marshall Fund.

It’s not that European countries haven’t been under pressure to boost military spending. As far back as 2006, NATO defense ministers agreed on a target of spending 2 percent of GDP on defense.


And yet, despite Russia’s attacks in Ukraine and years of cajolingfrom Washington, as of last year, only 11 of the alliance’s 31 members met that goal— eight of them frontline states bordering Russia or Ukraine.

Pouring more cash into defense, however, is not an easy sell for politicians, especially in Western Europe where war still seems far away. Military spending means less for social welfare and the green transition. EU states are also already heavily indebted because of the Covid crisis, and growth prospects are grim.


“In Europe, we have a defense industrial capacity largely designed for peacetime,” Jonson, the Swedish defense minister, told a seminar in Stockholm earlier this month.

According to General Brieger, the EU Military Committee chairman, Europe “urgent[ly] needs” more strategic transportation, space-based capabilities for early warning and ground capabilities such as anti-tank, anti-air and anti-drones equipment.


Germany, which says it will reach the 2 percent spending target this year thanks to a special one-off €100 billion military fund, revamped its military strategy in November for the first time since 2011, aiming to make the Bundeswehr “war-ready.”

“Today, nobody can seriously doubt what we in Germany have been avoiding for a long time, namely that we need a powerful Bundeswehr,” said Chancellor Olaf Scholz.

“It’s important to give the right framing to convince public opinion,” Weber said. In Germany, she explained, the debate is presented as a trade-off between building a new school or buying tanks: “That’s not the right thing to say. Rather, it’s about safeguarding and securing our way of life.”

But the pipeline of new equipment is still relatively empty, especially as a lot is being sent to Ukraine and deliveries of new gear can take months or years. And there’s the bigger question about the timing of any potential Russian invasion, and whether Europe would be ready in time.

“It’s important to underline progress has been made, but if you compare what has been done so far with what probably needs to be done, we are still talking about peanuts,” said Missiroli, the former NATO assistant secretary-general.




Excargodog is offline  
Old 01-25-2024, 07:37 AM
  #2078  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
...long term fecklessness.
Looking out from a Berliner’s balcony, where you may spot pigeon on menus, Russian artillery threats are meh. Whereas Gazprom recovery, stability, an immediate concern. NATO alliance members have little, no choice but to brace for another Summer of budget busting bad news.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 01-26-2024, 09:49 AM
  #2079  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,252
Default Logistics, logistics, logistics….

https://www.yahoo.com/news/nato-vast...123705449.html


An excerpt:

  • NATO has vastly underestimated Russia's capabilities, a top general said.
  • Russia can make millions of shells a year and recruit hundreds of thousands of troops, he said.
  • "They can produce even more — many times more — ammunition," Martin Herem told Bloomberg.
NATO has significantly underestimated Russia's capacity to replenish its armed forces with personnel and ammunition, a senior general said.

Martin Herem, the commander of the Estonian Defense Forces, told Bloomberg that new intelligence on Russia's capabilities had sparked a reassessment in the military alliance, as well as a flurry of warnings to prepare for a protracted conflict.

Contrary to earlier predictions, Russia can now produce several million artillery shells a year and recruit hundreds of thousands of soldiers, he said.

"A lot of people thought they couldn't go beyond that — today, the facts tell us otherwise," Herem told Bloomberg.

He added: "They can produce even more — many times more — ammunition."

In July, Adm. Tony Radakin, the formal head of the UK's armed forces, said that Russia could "at best" produce 1 million shells a year, per the Financial Times.

The UK Ministry of Defense estimated in December that Russia could need up to 10 years to replenish its army.

But that narrative has shifted over the past few months, with military commanders, analysts, and NATO officials warning of Russia's increasing capacities.

In September, an unnamed Western official warned of Russia's ability to make 2 million artillery shells a year, per Reuters.

And Christopher Cavoli, the commander of US European Command, said in April that despite significant losses in Ukraine, Russia's ground forces were bigger than when it invaded Ukraine
Excargodog is offline  
Old 01-26-2024, 01:38 PM
  #2080  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Cl65 left
Posts: 175
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Ex! Don’t worry about all those facts! Probably just Russian propaganda anyway. Just wait for the F16 Fighting Falcons to swoop in and finish off what all the leopard 2, Abram’s tanks, and Bradley’s didn’t finish. The Rooskies will be running home soon!
T1000 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boeing Aviator
United
18
03-22-2022 12:04 PM
decrabbitz
FedEx
8
09-18-2021 11:22 PM
HerkDriver
Cargo
5
09-18-2007 02:56 PM
DiamondZ
Cargo
16
03-22-2007 11:38 AM
RockBottom
Hangar Talk
0
08-22-2006 08:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices