Ukraine conflict
#1371
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,466
Stop obfuscating, be an adult and answer the questions or be and adult and admit you have no other solutions than whining like your media gods tell you to do.
what is the west suppose to do in the face of autocratic leaders executing territorial expansion beyond their internationally recognized borders?
i don’t understand the tucker comment, happy to play ball but i dont get it.
#1373
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2023
Posts: 722
I agreed early on that the Ukraine was going to come out of this feeling betrayed. You can see that now, as their neighboring governments pay more attention to their next election than what affect their policies have on Ukraine (or NATO too for that matter. All those 2% FOR DEFENSE promises the EU countries with the highest GDP are going back to the “Well, maybe next year…or maybe later in the decade…” status.)
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/germ...target/2974598
https://www.euractiv.com/section/pol...-fiscal-rules/
https://tradingeconomics.com/spain/m...p-wb-data.html
Feckless…
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/germ...target/2974598
https://www.euractiv.com/section/pol...-fiscal-rules/
https://tradingeconomics.com/spain/m...p-wb-data.html
Feckless…
He's still complaining.
https://www.reuters.com/world/nato-a...ts-2023-07-07/
#1374
This post is proof that Excargodog's opinion will remain forever unmoved regardless of new data. The 2% target was his complaint 2 years ago. Now that's being met.
He's still complaining.
https://www.reuters.com/world/nato-a...ts-2023-07-07/
He's still complaining.
https://www.reuters.com/world/nato-a...ts-2023-07-07/
Did you miss the “…in the future…” in the above article? They have been promising “in the future…” for decades. IT’S NOT BEING MET NOW by the countries with the largest economies, like Germany, Italy, Spain, and France. And based on their previous decades of fecklessness, there is little reason to believe it will happen next year either. It’s ALWAYS manana for these guys, despite their promises.
Are you aware when the FIRST promises of 2% were made? Decades ago. Then reiterated at meeting after meeting. But it doesn’t get done.
All three Bush administrations and the Clinton and Obama administrations pushed for NATO members to spend at least 2% of GDP. Didn’t happen.
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_67655.htm
It’s like clockwork: As NATO’s late June summit in Madrid approaches, the debate over whether allies spend too little on defense grows louder. NATO defense ministers pledged in 2006 to spend at least 2 percent of their nation’s gross domestic product on their defense annually. Today that’s become a totemic object for the alliance—especially for Americans who insist that others are spending too little.
[On September 5, 2014, the heads of state and government of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) issued a declaration following the alliance’s summit in Newport, Wales. This document constitutes NATO’s highest-level conceptual response to the crisis that has been unfolding since the fall of 2013 in Ukraine. This crisis led to the deterioration of relations between the West and Russia and is widely seen as marking a fundamental shift in Europe’s security architecture.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. But if you believe that these guys who have been reneging on their promises for decades are REALLY going to turn it around, YOU are the real fool.
Last edited by Excargodog; 09-22-2023 at 01:29 PM.
#1375
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,902
Offered that in reply to several posts. You tell me?
Doesn’t understand Tucker paper? What, a dozen times, more probably in this thread alone, labeling any resistance to a record of abject policy failure, over 2 successive campaigns, Fox pawns? When, by any measure, all 3 mainstream networks consistently accept administrative explanation of why its war in Eastern Europe is at Winter's door, a reeking trench filled stalemate. So as year 3 lays claim on US media, the feckless voter gets another chance to kick the can. Whatever's left that is.
Doesn’t understand Tucker paper? What, a dozen times, more probably in this thread alone, labeling any resistance to a record of abject policy failure, over 2 successive campaigns, Fox pawns? When, by any measure, all 3 mainstream networks consistently accept administrative explanation of why its war in Eastern Europe is at Winter's door, a reeking trench filled stalemate. So as year 3 lays claim on US media, the feckless voter gets another chance to kick the can. Whatever's left that is.
#1376
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2023
Posts: 722
Complains about the future. Posts charts from 2 years ago. I don't know if you have been paying attention to world news, but there has been a significant development in Europe since 2021. Your charts are invalid.
#1377
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Cl65 left
Posts: 175
Offered that in reply to several posts. You tell me?
Doesn’t understand Tucker paper? What, a dozen times, more probably in this thread alone, labeling any resistance to a record of abject policy failure, over 2 successive campaigns, Fox pawns? When, by any measure, all 3 mainstream networks consistently accept administrative explanation of why its war in Eastern Europe is at Winter's door, a reeking trench filled stalemate. So as year 3 lays claim on US media, the feckless voter gets another chance to kick the can. Whatever's left that is.
Doesn’t understand Tucker paper? What, a dozen times, more probably in this thread alone, labeling any resistance to a record of abject policy failure, over 2 successive campaigns, Fox pawns? When, by any measure, all 3 mainstream networks consistently accept administrative explanation of why its war in Eastern Europe is at Winter's door, a reeking trench filled stalemate. So as year 3 lays claim on US media, the feckless voter gets another chance to kick the can. Whatever's left that is.
#1378
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,466
please elaborate a plan.
as to your “abject failure” of a policy. If the goal is to reduce/eliminate the RUs consistent aggression towards its neighbors (georgia/moldova/Ukraine), how has this been a failure? Russia has been decimated militarily. That is objectively true.
please counter these points and stop dancing around like a pigeon on a chess board.
#1379
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,466
he will never admit it. He is literally incapable of circling back and acknowledging where he may have been wrong. He will never answer direct questions that he knows refute his statements. It is ridiculously childish on all fronts. Good luck.
#1380
One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. Feckless is as feckless does. And you didn’t even fully read the article you posted which said they would fund 2% in the future.
That too is feckless. Maybe YOU ought to join NATO. As John Goodman said in Argo, ‘You’ll fit right in.”
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post