Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Ukraine conflict

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2023, 07:55 PM
  #1301  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Position: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Posts: 2,283
Default

CIA has overthrown, or attempted to overthrow at least 60+ governments in the last 70 years.

My country, right or wrong. Let the spice/oil flow, I don't GAS. "Monroe Doctrine is Dead" [wink wink]

As long as the checks clear and I (or my progeny) doesn't get drafted.

Don't delude yourself you're on the side of right and might, however.

Nation states aren't moral actors. (You are though, behave accordingly)
DeltaboundRedux is offline  
Old 09-08-2023, 08:06 PM
  #1302  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,831
Default

Originally Posted by ReluctantEskimo
C'mon man.Wait, I think that's the point with you. It's not straight and never will be.
No change on my end. Step up, broker terms. Now. Tell us where YOU stand. At least the other two have a position. You know, another war and all. Where we go from here iceman?
METO Guido is offline  
Old 09-08-2023, 08:18 PM
  #1303  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2023
Posts: 701
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido
No change on my end. Step up, broker terms. Now. Tell us where YOU stand. At least the other two have a position. You know, another war and all. Where we go from here iceman?
Since you were throwing around the defense of Ukraine as being on the same level as Vietnam and Iraq, I don't expect you to have much of an understanding between offensive and defensive operations. But just know that appeasement is the road to the destruction of Ukraine as a nation.

What's next you ask? ATACMS.
ReluctantEskimo is offline  
Old 09-08-2023, 08:32 PM
  #1304  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,831
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
CIA has overthrown, or attempted to overthrow at least 60+ governments in the last 70 years.

My country, right or wrong. Let the spice/oil flow, I don't GAS. "Monroe Doctrine is Dead" [wink wink]

As long as the checks clear and I (or my progeny) doesn't get drafted.

Don't delude yourself you're on the side of right and might, however.

Nation states aren't moral actors. (You are though, behave accordingly)
I know. I hear you. Dirty business. War isn’t about behavior. Winners & losers, that’s all. Losers can expect what these days? Probably not $285 hr. to pull gear.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 09-09-2023, 12:24 AM
  #1305  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,595
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
It might also prohibit using it for certain purposes... that would be sensible since if you allow one party to use your service in an armed conflict, the opposing party might shoot your satellites down. The business model probably wouldn't account for that. Better to let the combatants pay you to launch their wholly-owned satellites.
This comes up every now and then, but correct me if I'm wrong, my understanding is that no-one has the capability to start shooting down satellites en masse? ASATs have mostly been used as single "show of force" style events, but no-one really has capability to shoot down more than one or two, and even then success is not guaranteed?
dera is offline  
Old 09-09-2023, 12:52 AM
  #1306  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,047
Default

Originally Posted by dera
This comes up every now and then, but correct me if I'm wrong, my understanding is that no-one has the capability to start shooting down satellites en masse? ASATs have mostly been used as single "show of force" style events, but no-one really has capability to shoot down more than one or two, and even then success is not guaranteed?
Reasonably US, RU, PRC, or India could shoot down as many satellites as they wanted to. It's not hard at all, unless the target satellite is specifically designed to be LO and/or tactically maneuverable.

The munitions are not very expensive. Not sure who has what in inventory, but it wouldn't take long to acquire more.

Any of the G7 could do it if they wanted to.

Bottom line, ASAT weapons are cheaper than most satellites. Possible exception for very small satellites.

Critical national security satellites can be assumed to be LO, and possibly have other counter measures in the future.

Nobody has done it to an adversary to date, because that would be a gross escalation at best; or more likely an act of war.

But several nations have demonstrated the capability.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-09-2023, 06:46 AM
  #1307  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,437
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
But your analogy is flawed as well. He apparently shut them down BEFORE the advance, simply keeping the status quo with no loss of life on either side.

Dude……..
Lets track the conversation in chronological order so you can at least get your endorphin rush from a place of reality

1. i stated “if” its true…..”if” its true that he turned it off mid operation
2. you claim its the same as the US withholding long ranger arms
3. i say no, because it would be like giving them said weapons, letting them be about to use them, and then turning them off so they lose those weapons, which destroys your little comparison quite handily imo
4. you now claim that the whole analogy is flawed because he didnt do the “if” part

try and keep up pigeon, i dont mind arguing to get the entertainment, but dont gaslight please
Hubcapped is offline  
Old 09-09-2023, 06:51 AM
  #1308  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,437
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido
French, Afrikaans, Deutsch possibly.

So you heard of Starship Enterprise, good. Ran a long time in reruns then even bigger success with new crews decades later. Why? The future demands confrontation with bigger & more capable threats. Always. None of which is possible without equipping Starfleet the necessary tools. If you’d paid any attention to some of the acknowledged logistics & recruiting gaps in US readiness presented just in this thread, that might help drafting stronger, more credible pro-status quo arguments.
2 points:
by mentioning all those languages i assume then, that you are agreeing that a failed policy of appeasement is prevalent in history. Thank you. I expect your full support putting the RU back in its box henceforth

as to your star trek reference:
So to be clear, you are saying that this conflict is engineered by the defense industrial complex, and that the US government is purposefully trying to drag it out for money?

Last edited by Hubcapped; 09-09-2023 at 07:04 AM.
Hubcapped is offline  
Old 09-09-2023, 07:00 AM
  #1309  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,437
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Or Welch, or Scottish,or Breton, or Irish, or Gaelic, or Cornish, or Manx,

Without the threat of the Norsemen the United Kingdom might well have never United.

https://thevikingherald.com/article/...r-heard-of/493
Thank you for supporting my point on the consistent examples throughout history of the failed policy of appeasement. I guess that means you’re good with stopping russia with force?
Hubcapped is offline  
Old 09-09-2023, 07:08 AM
  #1310  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 788
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
CIA has overthrown, or attempted to overthrow at least 60+ governments in the last 70 years.

My country, right or wrong. Let the spice/oil flow, I don't GAS. "Monroe Doctrine is Dead" [wink wink]

As long as the checks clear and I (or my progeny) doesn't get drafted.

Don't delude yourself you're on the side of right and might, however.

Nation states aren't moral actors. (You are though, behave accordingly)
I suspect you would appreciate the late author/writer William Pfaff.
His last (I think it is) book "The Irony of Manifest Destiny" is his one read I liked best. Written during Obama's first term it is a bit dated, as it doesn't address the current rise of Fascism as personified by and in Putin's Russia, he makes a strong argument of how 'we got here' using the sea change of thought as a result of the Enlightenment.
You search for deeper causation makes this one a good fit.
MaxQ is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boeing Aviator
United
18
03-22-2022 11:04 AM
decrabbitz
FedEx
8
09-18-2021 10:22 PM
HerkDriver
Cargo
5
09-18-2007 01:56 PM
DiamondZ
Cargo
16
03-22-2007 10:38 AM
RockBottom
Hangar Talk
0
08-22-2006 07:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices