Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Ukraine conflict

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2023, 08:58 AM
  #1281  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,466
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Yeah interesting. Existing law probably doesn't address that.

I can understand why UA is upset, but I can kind of see Musk's point as well. If I were in his shoes, I would have asked the NSC (while they wouldn't take my call, I'm sure they'd take Elon's).
This becomes subjective, but if true, he should be held accountable. Particularly if he closed the link mid operation. At least give a time of shutdown so they would know not to utilize this asset.

”Pacifism is objectively pro-fascist. This is elementary common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side, you automatically help out that of the other. Nor is there any real way of remaining outside such a war as the present one. In practice, 'he that is not with me is against me'.George Orwell
Hubcapped is offline  
Old 09-08-2023, 08:59 AM
  #1282  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,406
Default

Originally Posted by MaxQ
Should any military capabilities be outsourced to a private company?
Starlink is not a military capability, and was never intended to be. It's a civilian commercial service.

This situation got weird because UA is using it for military purposes.

Originally Posted by MaxQ
Should a company wholly owned by Musk control the USA' s ability to launch satellites?
Not Elon's fault. All he did was succeed (dramatically) in an effort to greatly improve space access, at a much lower cost. Not his fault that his competitors suck arse. Again he was focused on civilian services, but the mil isn't entirely stupid so they jumped on the wagon too.

I'm sure boeing would absolutely LOVE it if the USG restricted SpaceX's operations to ensure that ULA could muddle along with old hardware and indefinite delays on new hardware, keeping launch rates low and prices astronomical (pun intended).

Originally Posted by MaxQ
Personal opinion: the more concentrated any capability is in either a foreign entity or private company, the more brittle the dependent military is.
I wouldn't want it dependent on ANY single entity, of any provenance.

Which is why ULA will continue to be paid vast sums to provide a backup alternative to SpaceX. And boeing is getting paid to work on (but never actually deliver) Starliner for Nasa. That thing makes MCAS look like genius innovation. I suppose it gives Elon at least a vague hint of competition to keep him honest.

I don't think the answer is .gov entities either... no competition and the whole enterprise will turn into a vast civil service jobs program. That's what happened to Space Shuttle, and is still perpetuated with the politically-mandated retention of legacy shuttle hardware in Nasa's new heavy lifter.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-08-2023, 09:11 AM
  #1283  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,406
Default

Originally Posted by Hubcapped
This becomes subjective, but if true, he should be held accountable. Particularly if he closed the link mid operation. At least give a time of shutdown so they would know not to utilize this asset.
Agree that he should have told them in advance.

I can almost assure you that there's no legal mechanism to "hold him accountable" in the US. This is one of those areas of technology advance that's probably way out in front of the regulatory infrastructure.

I bet that if you read the fine print on his service contract it allows him to terminate it for any reason or no reason, with no notice.

It might also prohibit using it for certain purposes... that would be sensible since if you allow one party to use your service in an armed conflict, the opposing party might shoot your satellites down. The business model probably wouldn't account for that. Better to let the combatants pay you to launch their wholly-owned satellites.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-08-2023, 10:00 AM
  #1284  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,902
Default

Originally Posted by Hubcapped
”Pacifism is objectively pro-fascist. This is elementary common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side, you automatically help out that of the other. Nor is there any real way of remaining outside such a war as the present one. In practice, 'he that is not with me is against me'.George Orwell
Yeah, surviving to deny tomorrow’s enemies a shot is for patsies. Worf, son of Mogh. Who doesn’t want to be a blog Klingon?
METO Guido is offline  
Old 09-08-2023, 10:18 AM
  #1285  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,252
Default

Originally Posted by Hubcapped
This becomes subjective, but if true, he should be held accountable. Particularly if he closed the link mid operation. At least give a time of shutdown so they would know not to utilize this asset.

”Pacifism is objectively pro-fascist. This is elementary common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side, you automatically help out that of the other. Nor is there any real way of remaining outside such a war as the present one. In practice, 'he that is not with me is against me'.George Orwell
And yet that’s been US policy throughout this war, to limit the range and capabilities of the weapons systems the US has been providing. Should the Biden administration then “be held accountable” for not providing long range weapons sooner?
Excargodog is offline  
Old 09-08-2023, 10:31 AM
  #1286  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,252
Default Some things speak for themselves…




https://www.politico.eu/article/ukra...george-w-bush/
Excargodog is offline  
Old 09-08-2023, 12:59 PM
  #1287  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,466
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
And yet that’s been US policy throughout this war, to limit the range and capabilities of the weapons systems the US has been providing. Should the Biden administration then “be held accountable” for not providing long range weapons sooner?
False equivalency. If what elon did was true, it would be like giving the Ukrainians M1a1s, and as soon as they advance we kill switch them and they shut down.

i made a clear delineation that it was mid op. Nice try though
Hubcapped is offline  
Old 09-08-2023, 01:00 PM
  #1288  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,466
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido
Yeah, surviving to deny tomorrow’s enemies a shot is for patsies. Worf, son of Mogh. Who doesn’t want to be a blog Klingon?
I don’t know what any of this means bruh
Hubcapped is offline  
Old 09-08-2023, 01:06 PM
  #1289  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,902
Default

Originally Posted by Hubcapped
I don’t know what any of this means bruh
You, poster Hubcap, got a hair trigger hard on to take out a 20+ year, Russian regime that’s just as unprofessional as it is blood thirsty. They leave their friggin dead behind. Meanwhile we’re staring at another budget impasse. Any clue why? Notice you like to ask leading questions & demand answers too. Tell me this, how is it a whatever it takes proponent of unrestricted, forever support for this war, can’t quite maintain composure dealing with Meto’s trifling of the King’s English? Is it YOUR 2nd language?
METO Guido is offline  
Old 09-08-2023, 01:11 PM
  #1290  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,466
Default

Originally Posted by METO Guido
You, poster Hubcap, got a hair trigger hard on to take out a 20+ year, Russian regime that’s just as unprofessional as it is blood thirsty. They leave their friggin dead behind. Meanwhile we’re staring at another budget impasse. Any clue why? Notice you like to ask leading questions & demand answers too. Tell me this, how is it a whatever it takes proponent of unrestricted, forever support for this war, can’t quite maintain composure dealing with Meto’s trifling of the King’s English? Is it YOUR 2nd language?
dude, you were talking about klingons……..

if saying “i dont know what this means” indicates a loss of composure to you….. I think that says more about you than about me

as soon as Russia gets back into their internationally recognized borders, I don’t care what they do.

Its about precedent…..again if that doesn’t do it for you, nothing will. History is filled with countless examples of the failed policy of appeasement.


if the english had continued the failed policy of appeasement, we would all be speaking Danish right now for one.
Hubcapped is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boeing Aviator
United
18
03-22-2022 12:04 PM
decrabbitz
FedEx
8
09-18-2021 11:22 PM
HerkDriver
Cargo
5
09-18-2007 02:56 PM
DiamondZ
Cargo
16
03-22-2007 11:38 AM
RockBottom
Hangar Talk
0
08-22-2006 08:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices