Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Why??? 1X

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-2007, 08:38 PM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cubflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Waiting for retirements
Posts: 232
Default

Originally Posted by keiundraj
I'm trying to learn something. I'm not trying to step on anyone's toes either. As I said before I'm a man first!!! I was insulted so I responded. I also admitted that I bit off more than I can chew. ATP has nothing to do with my way of thinking I have that right to inquire and ask questions right?
OK. The fact that you are learning about scope is great. Good luck in the real world....and I mean that. Try to learn as much as you can from the perspective of those of us who are out there day in and day out (night in and night out).
cubflyer is offline  
Old 06-11-2007, 08:38 PM
  #92  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Default

Originally Posted by POPA
Did you live under powerlines as a kid?
Heh, heh. Why?

-Ben
pete2800 is offline  
Old 06-11-2007, 08:38 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
blastoff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 1,531
Default

Originally Posted by keiundraj
My oversimplified example still doesn't seem to hit you. OK OK If You're right SCOPE DOES NOT PREVENT A MAJOR FROM OPERATING SMALLER JETS. SCOPE DOES NOT PREVENT A MAINLINE CARRIER FROM OPERATING RJS. But it does prevent their Pilots from flying them?
Um what? It doesn't prevent their pilots from flying them...but if a mainline pilots company doesn't fly RJ's, of course he won't fly RJ's.
blastoff is offline  
Old 06-11-2007, 08:40 PM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
keiundraj's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: E145 Right Side
Posts: 209
Default

The problem is that Scope Clauses stand in the way of a carrier's choosing the right-size aircraft for a Specific marketplace. After doing research in their own market Let's say an airline was taking a 737 into a given market. After realizing that this route is profitable but would be more profitable if it was being flown by a 70seat aircraft. Now they have to pay another airline to operate this flight for them because it'll make more money for them to do it this route, as opposed to continuing to send the 73 there, they have no Choice. They're having to pay for a profitable route to be operated by another carrier. Not only is it hurting the Major but also the Regional's Pilots
keiundraj is offline  
Old 06-11-2007, 08:43 PM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
keiundraj's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: E145 Right Side
Posts: 209
Default

Look Guys I'm not being arrogant and saying I'm smarter than any of you all, honestly I'm just trying to learn something. The suggestion that RJ are not profitable isn't reasonable. If they weren't profitable they there wouldn't be so many RJs flyin.
Express Jet just started their Own branded flying I guess how this turns out will prove weather RJ can be profitable without being Contracted by the Majors
keiundraj is offline  
Old 06-11-2007, 08:49 PM
  #96  
Gets Off
 
md11phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Nordskog Industries Field Technician
Posts: 688
Default

Originally Posted by keiundraj
The problem is that Scope Clauses stand in the way of a carrier's choosing the right-size aircraft for a Specific marketplace. After doing research in their own market Let's say an airline was taking a 737 into a given market. After realizing that this route is profitable but would be more profitable if it was being flown by a 70seat aircraft. Now they have to pay another airline to operate this flight for them because it'll make more money for them to do it this route, as opposed to continuing to send the 73 there, they have no Choice. They're having to pay for a profitable route to be operated by another carrier. Not only is it hurting the Major but also the Regional's Pilots
Wow.

So using your oversimplified example, why doesn't the mainline just purchase and fly their own 70-seaters, eliminating the middle man?

(Please get it.)
md11phlyer is offline  
Old 06-11-2007, 08:50 PM
  #97  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by keiundraj

No I got my Degree from a well know Accredited University...

I'm a bit puzzled why you're being so coy about your credentials. In your very first post on APC you announced that you are a product of Delta State University, where you received a B.S. in Aviation Management. (You had to change majors from Flight Operations due to to money -- perhaps you missed some critical areas in the switch.)

Your lack of knowledge of the aviation industry, the history of the airline industry, commuters, feeders, and regionals, and your communications skills all cast a shadow on the value of the education you received. You've got a lot to learn, and it's not going to be easy with the attitude you have here. Your first post ended with, "GET A GRIP. It's going to take me 150days to go from PPL-CFI CFII MEI. If I can do that Hats off to me, but don't be mad because it took you 4yrs." There are better ways to win friends and influence people.



Coy about credentials . . . maybe I do know. According to the Delta State website, they don't offer a Bachelor of Science in Aviation Mangement. Their College of Business has a Commercial Aviation department. They offer a Bachelor of Commercial Aviation degree. From their website, "Upon graduation, Flight Operations Majors hold at least a Commercial Pilot Certificate with Airplane Single and Multi-engine land and Instrument-Airplane ratings, along with a Flight Instructor Certificate." That sounds like what you're planning to get at ATP. I'm confused why you'd ditch that opportunity to go pay money for the same thing at ATP?

Oh, well. You're the bright one, not us.

You have a B.S.? BS!





.
TonyC is offline  
Old 06-11-2007, 08:50 PM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
keiundraj's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: E145 Right Side
Posts: 209
Default

THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I'M ASKING!!!!!!

The Pilot Group contracts Says they WON'T fly them... It's a CONTRACT!
keiundraj is offline  
Old 06-11-2007, 08:52 PM
  #99  
Gets Off
 
md11phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Nordskog Industries Field Technician
Posts: 688
Default

Originally Posted by keiundraj
THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I'M ASKING!!!!!!

The Pilot Group contracts Says they WON'T fly them... It's a CONTRACT!
What scope clause says that? Please tell me.
md11phlyer is offline  
Old 06-11-2007, 08:53 PM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Spartan
Posts: 3,652
Default

Originally Posted by keiundraj
Look Guys I'm not being arrogant and saying I'm smarter than any of you all, honestly I'm just trying to learn something. The suggestion that RJ are not profitable isn't reasonable. If they weren't profitable they there wouldn't be so many RJs flyin.
Express Jet just started their Own branded flying I guess how this turns out will prove weather RJ can be profitable without being Contracted by the Majors
Do a search on Independence Air. You will learn a lot about RJ's and profitability(or lack there of).
Slice is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices