Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Unluckiest Generation >

Unluckiest Generation

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Unluckiest Generation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2020, 08:56 AM
  #331  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,818
Default

Originally Posted by AirbusPTC
Ok, now I see where you're coming from. To me this is all semantics right? Whether the war was fought because they seceded or they seceded because the Southern states wanted to assert their authority over the federal government. So they could then abolish federal laws they didn't support, especially laws interfering with the South's right to keep slaves and take them wherever they wished. The bottom line was IF it wasn't for slavery, trying to preserve slavery, trying to expand slavery westward...there would have been no votes to secede and no civil war. Everything else is just a bs exercise in semantics.
No, there were other reasons the southern states left the union besides slavery. The northern states were placing onerous taxation and regulations on the south.

The North were the aggressors for not allowing the Southern states to leave peacefully.
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 07-22-2020, 09:41 AM
  #332  
Speed Verified
 
Beech Dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,144
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
No, there were other reasons the southern states left the union besides slavery. The northern states were placing onerous taxation and regulations on the south.

The North were the aggressors for not allowing the Southern states to leave peacefully.
Love the history talk, but, yeah, semantics, words do mean things. North v. South is the commonly used phrase; but really it was the Federal gov't displeasing the State governments. Maine wasn't ordering or legislating things to change Virginia. Plus, once the war broke out it was a war between the United States of America and the Confederate States of America. You can't really call Kansas "the North" and Texas "the South."

IRT the thread title though, every generation has trials and tribulations. Its called life. Different events and even greater, varying levels of struggle and sacrifice. Personally, I don't feel unlucky. This is just another hurdle to get over. Fun discussion though. Have a great day everybody.
Beech Dude is offline  
Old 07-22-2020, 10:45 AM
  #333  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 762
Default

Originally Posted by AirbusPTC
Ok, now I see where you're coming from. To me this is all semantics right? Whether the war was fought because they seceded or they seceded because the Southern states wanted to assert their authority over the federal government. So they could then abolish federal laws they didn't support, especially laws interfering with the South's right to keep slaves and take them wherever they wished. The bottom line was IF it wasn't for slavery, trying to preserve slavery, trying to expand slavery westward...there would have been no votes to secede and no civil war. Everything else is just a bs exercise in semantics.
Its not semantics, the Union could have honored the votes of those people and allowed the States to leave. There would have been no war. The Union did not go after the Confederate states because of slavery, they fought to prevent them from leaving the Union.

Edit: It is ironic that so many people in this thread said “If you don’t like it leave”, that’s exactly what the confederate states did, only problem was Lincoln would not allow them to leave. They could have attempted a hostile take over of the government, but they decided to leave peacefully, the Union decided they could not.

South Carolina had a constitutional right to leave the Union. Lincoln violated that right, among the many constitutional rights that he violated of the American people.

Last edited by NE_Pilot; 07-22-2020 at 11:06 AM.
NE_Pilot is offline  
Old 07-22-2020, 01:42 PM
  #334  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bozo the pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Default

Originally Posted by Beech Dude
Love the history talk, but, yeah, semantics, words do mean things. North v. South is the commonly used phrase; but really it was the Federal gov't displeasing the State governments. Maine wasn't ordering or legislating things to change Virginia. Plus, once the war broke out it was a war between the United States of America and the Confederate States of America. You can't really call Kansas "the North" and Texas "the South."

IRT the thread title though, every generation has trials and tribulations. Its called life. Different events and even greater, varying levels of struggle and sacrifice. Personally, I don't feel unlucky. This is just another hurdle to get over. Fun discussion though. Have a great day everybody.
You sure you're a part of this generation? You sound on point, you dont whine, and you have a circumspect view on the timeline. Well done. Please pass this perspective to some of the snowflakes on this board. You da man.
Bozo the pilot is offline  
Old 07-22-2020, 04:16 PM
  #335  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,892
Default

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

This is the goal. A Union, not 50 mini-me's. Or 330,000,000.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 07-22-2020, 06:09 PM
  #336  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 59
Default

Even if succession is justified by lack of mention in the Constitution, the CSA was properly conquered and annexed. The US conquered territory from Mexico and Spain as well. Nothing in the Constitution prohibits the United States from doing so.
Rightup is offline  
Old 07-22-2020, 06:10 PM
  #337  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AirbusPTC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Posts: 317
Default

Originally Posted by NE_Pilot
Its not semantics, the Union could have honored the votes of those people and allowed the States to leave. There would have been no war. The Union did not go after the Confederate states because of slavery, they fought to prevent them from leaving the Union.

Edit: It is ironic that so many people in this thread said “If you don’t like it leave”, that’s exactly what the confederate states did, only problem was Lincoln would not allow them to leave. They could have attempted a hostile take over of the government, but they decided to leave peacefully, the Union decided they could not.

South Carolina had a constitutional right to leave the Union. Lincoln violated that right, among the many constitutional rights that he violated of the American people.


Although Constitutional principle and secession were the proximate cause of conflict, they were not the ultimate cause of the War. To identify that ultimate cause, you must examine the words of those who led the secessionist movement. Like I said, read their speeches. The South’s defense of the very real institution of slavery and of the economy, society, culture, and civilization built upon slavery was the indispensable factor that led to war. That led the south to seize federal property within their borders, which cause Federal troops to take action. But again the root cause was slavery.

...and just curious, where does the Constitution give the states the right to secede?
AirbusPTC is offline  
Old 07-22-2020, 06:17 PM
  #338  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 762
Default

Originally Posted by AirbusPTC
Although Constitutional principle and secession were the proximate cause of conflict, they were not the ultimate cause of the War. To identify that ultimate cause, you must examine the words of those who led the secessionist movement. Like I said, read their speeches. The South’s defense of the very real institution of slavery and of the economy, society, culture, and civilization built upon slavery was the indispensable factor that led to war. That led the south to seize federal property within their borders, which cause Federal troops to take action. But again the root cause was slavery.

...and just curious, where does the Constitution give the states the right to secede?
Read the Constitution, it’s pretty clear that the states have the right to secede.

You continue to conflate secession with the war. South Carolina seceded, had Lincoln not attempted to force those states back into the Union, there would have been no war. Lincoln did not send troops to free slaves, he sent troops to force the Confederate states back into the Union.
NE_Pilot is offline  
Old 07-22-2020, 06:19 PM
  #339  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 59
Default

Originally Posted by NE_Pilot
Read the Constitution, it’s pretty clear that the states have the right to secede.
It is not "pretty clear." There is just no explicit mention of succession.
Rightup is offline  
Old 07-22-2020, 06:22 PM
  #340  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 762
Default

Originally Posted by Rightup
It is not "pretty clear." There is just no explicit mention of succession.
Well then, let me help enlighten you. Read the 10th Amendment:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Secession is not delegated to the US nor is it prohibited by the Constitution, therefore it is reserved to the States or the people.
NE_Pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hurricane757
American
11
02-18-2014 12:59 PM
dino1pilot
Regional
104
08-24-2012 12:41 PM
gtechpilot
Regional
1
03-21-2012 06:18 AM
DYNASTY HVY
Hangar Talk
34
03-11-2009 03:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices