Many being indirectly saved by the CVIrus...
#1
Many being indirectly saved by the CVIrus...
According to this info, China has seen more people saved by the CVirus, than the number of deaths worldwide. There have also been a drastic reduction in traffic deaths in China indirectly because of the CVirus.
https://www.sciencealert.com/here-s-what-covid-19-is-doing-to-our-pollution-levels
Here is the blog post with the data details...
https://www.360dx.com/pcr/coronaviru...D#.XnR582hKhPY
The two months of pollution reduction, Burke calculates, has probably saved the lives of 4,000 children under 5 and 73,000 adults over 70 in China. That's significantly more than the current global death toll from the virus itself.
Here is the blog post with the data details...
https://www.360dx.com/pcr/coronaviru...D#.XnR582hKhPY
#3
If we destroyed our economies and devolved them to a Medieval level there would be no traffic deaths (save the occasional oxcart) or pollution deaths (save the occasional second-hand smoke from witch-burning.)
Let's go for it.
Let's go for it.
#6
Citing articles isn't trolling - at least the post nor the poster.
If anything is a troll - it is the article.
Just for a fun hypothetical exercise to pass the time - which part of the statistics behind the article do you disagree with and where is your research to write a counter-article?
If anything is a troll - it is the article.
Just for a fun hypothetical exercise to pass the time - which part of the statistics behind the article do you disagree with and where is your research to write a counter-article?
#8
I’m certainly not smart enough to think of them, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the trickledown effects are going be harder to deal with the virus itself in the end game.
#9
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 62
Citing articles isn't trolling - at least the post nor the poster.
If anything is a troll - it is the article.
Just for a fun hypothetical exercise to pass the time - which part of the statistics behind the article do you disagree with and where is your research to write a counter-article?
If anything is a troll - it is the article.
Just for a fun hypothetical exercise to pass the time - which part of the statistics behind the article do you disagree with and where is your research to write a counter-article?
It's still stupid.
It's still a troll.
You should feel stupid for trying to legitimize it.
#10
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post