Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Trump to announce ATC privatization >

Trump to announce ATC privatization

Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Trump to announce ATC privatization

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2017, 10:37 AM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 79
Default

It's a bad idea that, like a cockroach, keeps coming back.

ATC does need modernization. Vacuum Tubes are still in widespread use. The technology to modernize is here. It works wonderfully. The problem is that, as part of the bureaucratic bloat that is our federal government, it's a mind-numbingly slow process and precious money gets wasted along the way. So, rather than fix the root of the problem (bureaucracy), the critters in DC want to create a whole new program. That always works.

It's "interesting" that the airlines (except Delta) are in full support of this. On one hand, it's natural because they are a heavy user of the system. That's only part of the story, though. Consider that the airlines also would like more butts in their seats and not traveling by other means (private, fractional, charter). A user fee system would be a great burden on those operators.

Here's my idea: keep the current funding system. Remove ATC functions from the FAA and create a new agency under DOT just for the purposes of Air Traffic Control. Call it the Federal Air Traffic Control Administration (for example). Instead of a parent/child relationship, FAA and FATCA would have a sibling relationship. There would still be bureaucratic bloat, but less of it and each agency would be better able to concentrate on what are it's essential functions.

Air Traffic Control is an essential public safety function. Initial reports suggested that the "new" ATC would be a non-profit government corporation (like Amtrak) but now I keep seeing references to a non-profit private corporation. The government corp would have limited congressional supervision. The private corporation would only have what supervision is called for in the contract. I bet Lockheed-Martin is drooling all over this like a starving dog over a steak.

Some more food for thought: Why would Delta be opposed to a privatized, user fee based ATC system (other than their own study)? Delta Private Jets, Inc.
FlyingStormie is offline  
Old 06-09-2017, 02:30 PM
  #22  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 516
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
That doesn't articulate how private ATC would be "better"...only cheaper. And it is arguable that privatized would actually be less expensive, given the FAA's total 2015 budget was $15.7B and Airport & Airway Trust Fund revenues (paid directly by users in the form of fuel excise taxes and ticket fees) for 2015 were north of $14.5B.
You know the corporate cronies are itching to get their hands on that trust fund. After the rape it will be another "too big to fail" bonanza.
kevbo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
UAL T38 Phlyer
United
44
01-28-2018 07:05 PM
50SeatsofGrey
Major
45
03-22-2017 07:08 AM
cantwin
Technical
6
04-28-2012 02:04 AM
atpcliff
Major
18
06-03-2009 10:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices