Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > GoJet
Gojet preparing for CRJ 900's >

Gojet preparing for CRJ 900's

Search

Notices
GoJet Regional Airline

Gojet preparing for CRJ 900's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-2012, 07:29 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
N927EV's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Qualified to carry liquids through security.
Posts: 771
Default

How does blow jet intend to staff these new airframes? They can't even handle what they have now.
N927EV is offline  
Old 07-04-2012, 07:42 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ctab5060X's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 268
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
Not true. The latest ASA was signed the eve of the Ch 11 filing. While the details are deemed "confidential" and I haven't seen them, the press release talks of 1:1 and 2:1 swaps with larger airframes (read:900's). In the end 9E will be forced to be shed of at least 16 -200's, although we can all assume that number will be higher with 125 -200's being the max at DCI in the end. The idea of losing all 141 by delta simply "saying so" doesn't seem to be the case as 9E is contracted to fly them. As always, we can "assume" that performance metrics and various clauses allow for the total number to be reduced by delta's desires/actions.

Things will get interesting in the next 6-9 months to play out in 12-18 months is a given for all of DCI. Being in Ch.11 doesn't necessarily help the situation.
Too logical and too factual for a thread started about GoJets
ctab5060X is offline  
Old 07-04-2012, 07:53 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
Not true. The latest ASA was signed the eve of the Ch 11 filing. While the details are deemed "confidential" and I haven't seen them, the press release talks of 1:1 and 2:1 swaps with larger airframes (read:900's). In the end 9E will be forced to be shed of at least 16 -200's, although we can all assume that number will be higher with 125 -200's being the max at DCI in the end. The idea of losing all 141 by delta simply "saying so" doesn't seem to be the case as 9E is contracted to fly them. As always, we can "assume" that performance metrics and various clauses allow for the total number to be reduced by delta's desires/actions.

Things will get interesting in the next 6-9 months to play out in 12-18 months is a given for all of DCI. Being in Ch.11 doesn't necessarily help the situation.
If you really think DL can't move aircraft they own wherever they want to then you're being incredibly naiive. The title on those aircraft say Delta, and if you think DL doesn't have some kind of clause that allows them to move them where they like, I have a bridge in Brooklyn for you. There is a very, very good chance 9E will be pared down to the Mesaba 900s if they aren't cost competitive. If you don't think Delta can do this you may be in for a harsh lesson.

I wish my former coworkers at 9E the best, but with the senior workforce that will be left as pilots are furloughed it will be difficult to compete with other carriers (i.e. Gojets) that have pilots without so much longevity. This is a tough game, and 9E is not on the good side of the cost curve in this deal. Hopefully they can improve their position relative to other regionals in terms of cost, but the sacrifices on all the pilots and senior pilots in particular to do this is going to be devastating.

What will happen is the beancounters at the crystal palace in ATL will put all the numbers into their smart pill machine, and the regionals with the best numbers in terms of cost will get the 900s. Rest assured they will work with their friends in the legal department to make sure these aircraft go where numbers dictate. Just because you're operating a bunch of 200s right now shouldn't give you a lot of comfort that 900s are coming your way if you can't compete in terms of cost.

It sucks, but that is the way this business works. Best of luck to everyone.
FlyingKat is offline  
Old 07-04-2012, 08:05 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sandlapper223's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: More Drag
Posts: 447
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingKat
If you really think DL can't move aircraft they own wherever they want to then you're being incredibly naiive. The title on those aircraft say Delta, and if you think DL doesn't have some kind of clause that allows them to move them where they like, I have a bridge in Brooklyn for you. There is a very, very good chance 9E will be pared down to the Mesaba 900s if they aren't cost competitive. If you don't think Delta can do this you may be in for a harsh lesson.

I wish my former coworkers at 9E the best, but with the senior workforce that will be left as pilots are furloughed it will be difficult to compete with other carriers (i.e. Gojets) that have pilots without so much longevity. This is a tough game, and 9E is not on the good side of the cost curve in this deal. Hopefully they can improve their position relative to other regionals in terms of cost, but the sacrifices on all the pilots and senior pilots in particular to do this is going to be devastating.

What will happen is the beancounters at the crystal palace in ATL will put all the numbers into their smart pill machine, and the regionals with the best numbers in terms of cost will get the 900s. Rest assured they will work with their friends in the legal department to make sure these aircraft go where numbers dictate. Just because you're operating a bunch of 200s right now shouldn't give you a lot of comfort that 900s are coming your way if you can't compete in terms of cost.

It sucks, but that is the way this business works. Best of luck to everyone.
The most brilliant post award goes to? I'm amazed, and grateful. Thank you for setting the industry straight. We are all completely educated now. Thank you.
sandlapper223 is offline  
Old 07-04-2012, 08:07 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Position: AN124 FE
Posts: 1,226
Default

The new ASA was from the eve on the Ch 11. The scope section on the new contract wasnt negotiated for another couple weeks. There is obvious change needed and Delta will do what they need to do to get the results they are looking for.
Fly782 is offline  
Old 07-04-2012, 08:14 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ
Posts: 2,356
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingKat
If you really think DL can't move aircraft they own wherever they want to then you're being incredibly naiive. The title on those aircraft say Delta, and if you think DL doesn't have some kind of clause that allows them to move them where they like, I have a bridge in Brooklyn for you. There is a very, very good chance 9E will be pared down to the Mesaba 900s if they aren't cost competitive. If you don't think Delta can do this you may be in for a harsh lesson.

I wish my former coworkers at 9E the best, but with the senior workforce that will be left as pilots are furloughed it will be difficult to compete with other carriers (i.e. Gojets) that have pilots without so much longevity. This is a tough game, and 9E is not on the good side of the cost curve in this deal. Hopefully they can improve their position relative to other regionals in terms of cost, but the sacrifices on all the pilots and senior pilots in particular to do this is going to be devastating.

What will happen is the beancounters at the crystal palace in ATL will put all the numbers into their smart pill machine, and the regionals with the best numbers in terms of cost will get the 900s. Rest assured they will work with their friends in the legal department to make sure these aircraft go where numbers dictate. Just because you're operating a bunch of 200s right now shouldn't give you a lot of comfort that 900s are coming your way if you can't compete in terms of cost.

It sucks, but that is the way this business works. Best of luck to everyone.
Not necessarily true either. There was a new ASA signed when we filed for bankruptcy. Like higney said we haven't seen it but we do know the jist of what was put in it since that was put in the BK filing.

Not only that but Delta did the DIP financing for pinnacle. The other debtors filed suit against delta to stop them from providing the financing to pinnacle because it gave them an unfair advantage. They had a meeting with the other debtors and they withdrew their objections which allowed delta to provide that financing with out further court costs or delays. What were they told that caused them to withdraw?

I, like some of the others here, believe pinnacle will see quite a few of the 900's here in exchange for our 200's. One of the main reason is as they take away the 200's we will be over staffed and have pilots on hand ready to staff the planes.

The only way delta is going to get their $73 million dollar investment back is to have us working for them. They are the reason we have been sent back to the table to renegotiate. Delta is calling our contract shots now and we will get the contract they want us to have. They will beat us down enough to get us to the level they want us at. Unfortunately it will mean we will be a smaller pilot group and all the gains we got in the new contract will be tossed out the window.
Airsupport is offline  
Old 07-04-2012, 08:16 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ
Posts: 2,356
Default

Originally Posted by Fly782
The new ASA was from the eve on the Ch 11. The scope section on the new contract wasnt negotiated for another couple weeks. There is obvious change needed and Delta will do what they need to do to get the results they are looking for.
now you don't really believe that delta didn't know what they were going to get when they put their scope on the table do you?
Airsupport is offline  
Old 07-04-2012, 08:20 PM
  #38  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 15
Default

They have a 2 Billion dollar investment in OH-do they care about that?
u2k2 is offline  
Old 07-04-2012, 08:22 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Position: AN124 FE
Posts: 1,226
Default

Originally Posted by Airsupport
now you don't really believe that delta didn't know what they were going to get when they put their scope on the table do you?
They were at 82 seats until the last day of negotiating, so no they did not know what they were going to get.
Fly782 is offline  
Old 07-04-2012, 08:28 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by Airsupport
Not necessarily true either. There was a new ASA signed when we filed for bankruptcy. Like higney said we haven't seen it but we do know the jist of what was put in it since that was put in the BK filing.

Not only that but Delta did the DIP financing for pinnacle. The other debtors filed suit against delta to stop them from providing the financing to pinnacle because it gave them an unfair advantage. They had a meeting with the other debtors and they withdrew their objections which allowed delta to provide that financing with out further court costs or delays. What were they told that caused them to withdraw?

I, like some of the others here, believe pinnacle will see quite a few of the 900's here in exchange for our 200's. One of the main reason is as they take away the 200's we will be over staffed and have pilots on hand ready to staff the planes.

The only way delta is going to get their $73 million dollar investment back is to have us working for them. They are the reason we have been sent back to the table to renegotiate. Delta is calling our contract shots now and we will get the contract they want us to have. They will beat us down enough to get us to the level they want us at. Unfortunately it will mean we will be a smaller pilot group and all the gains we got in the new contract will be tossed out the window.
Hmmm.....sounds like what I used to hear from my buds at Comair 6 years ago. It went something like "Delta spent 1.8 BILLION on us so there is no way they would want to lose their investment......"

73 million is chump change when you look at a long term contract for these 900s. They will take the loss, send the contract to somebody cheaper, and tell all those surplus pilots to go apply there if it makes more money for mother Delta.
FlyingKat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lolwut
GoJet
119
05-11-2012 10:29 AM
Foxcow
Regional
200
09-13-2009 09:00 PM
ERJ135
GoJet
121
06-05-2009 09:58 AM
skippy
GoJet
14
05-14-2009 11:12 AM
soon2bfo
GoJet
22
08-22-2007 10:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices