Gojet preparing for CRJ 900's
07-07-2012, 03:13 PM
#101
Bracing for Fallacies
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
I don't know when they got MU-2's. Looks like they have then though, plus their Lears.
Air Fleet | AirNet.com
Air Fleet | AirNet.com
07-07-2012, 05:05 PM
#102
Thuggin it out
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Rollin' Down tha 405
Posts: 2,568
Yeah, and when did they start flying Cessna 210s?! Did they merge or have a partnership of sorts with Flight Express? I believe their Lear fleet still exists, just not in the numbers they once were. I think the new company that bought them, Bayside (or something like that) changed Air Net a bit. Sad.
07-07-2012, 05:12 PM
#103
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Yeah, and when did they start flying Cessna 210s?! Did they merge or have a partnership of sorts with Flight Express? I believe their Lear fleet still exists, just not in the numbers they once were. I think the new company that bought them, Bayside (or something like that) changed Air Net a bit. Sad.
07-08-2012, 07:44 AM
#104
Respek
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,654
Johnso is correct Flight EX has both 210's and Baron's but I think they were slowly drawing down on the Baron's as year's went by.
07-08-2012, 08:31 AM
#105
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Posts: 119
The 900's will be used for 2/1 or 1/1 with the 200's so no, goget won't be getting any at this time.
07-08-2012, 08:58 AM
#106
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,316
Man! If this thread wasn't started as flamebait I don't know what to think any more. Like "ha ha guys we lowered the bar that much more. You're welcome 
".
".
07-08-2012, 08:59 AM
#107
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
I'm still wondering where people are finding language in the Delta TA that guarantees a regional 900s just because they are flying 200s presently. All the TA says is that DELTA can replace 200s with 900s at a 2 for 1 ratio. How Delta chooses to do that is up them. If they want to allow a contract to expire, buy it out, or find language to screw a regional partner, they don't have to replace a regional's 200s with 900s. They could tell one regional to park their 200s, and send the 900s to a regional that they feel works out better for Delta. There is nothing guaranteed in any of this, except Delta will do what it thinks is best for their bottom line.
07-08-2012, 09:00 AM
#109
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Position: AN124 FE
Posts: 1,226
I'm still wondering where people are finding language in the Delta TA that guarantees a regional 900s just because they are flying 200s presently. All the TA says is that DELTA can replace 200s with 900s at a 2 for 1 ratio. How Delta chooses to do that is up them. If they want to allow a contract to expire, buy it out, or find language to screw a regional partner, they don't have to replace a regional's 200s with 900s. They could tell one regional to park their 200s, and send the 900s to a regional that they feel works out better for Delta. There is nothing guaranteed in any of this, except Delta will do what it thinks is best for their bottom line.
07-08-2012, 09:14 AM
#110
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 133
Delta gave birth to the downward spiral of hub feeding regional jets. They allowed the first order of CRJ100s to come onboard back in the early 90s and the rest is history. I have to wonder if they'll ever have any success reversing the trend they created or just continue aiding the demise of the industry.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
