Unpolitical opinion on GoJet
#132
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 170 babysitter
Posts: 417
Sure, I'll dissect it for you:
"First of all GoJet deserves all of the bad rap it gets." -- Opinion
"It was formed in a very underhanded way..." -- Opinion
"...continues to operate under the auspices of that backstabbing original intent." -- False; it operates under the auspices of a union-negotiated collective bargaining agreement.
This is exactly what he said:
Note that he didn't say "lower QOL", etc, he said "lower PAY RATE", and that statement is categorically false.
"First of all GoJet deserves all of the bad rap it gets." -- Opinion
"It was formed in a very underhanded way..." -- Opinion
"...continues to operate under the auspices of that backstabbing original intent." -- False; it operates under the auspices of a union-negotiated collective bargaining agreement.
This is exactly what he said:
Note that he didn't say "lower QOL", etc, he said "lower PAY RATE", and that statement is categorically false.
#133
All that does is make Air Wisconsin look childish and unprofessional. Radio communications aren't the place to resolve such issues. Hopefully that Air Wisconsin crew will rethink their approach.
I can't think of a clearer example than what happened at ROC one day early on this winter. This involved the F'n Dirtbag air line and Air Wiskie.
ROC Tower: Air Wisconson #XXXX Follow the blue and white CRJ taking runway 24.
Air Wisconson: You mean GoJet??
ROC Tower: Afirmative.
Air Wisconson: Ok, We'll follow the scabs!
Nuf said!
ROC Tower: Air Wisconson #XXXX Follow the blue and white CRJ taking runway 24.
Air Wisconson: You mean GoJet??
ROC Tower: Afirmative.
Air Wisconson: Ok, We'll follow the scabs!
Nuf said!
#134
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: ERJ CA
Posts: 1,082
And equally as often, there isn't a good reason at all, just a bunch of people quick to jump to conclusions and walk off a logical cliff because "all the cool kids are doing it."
#135
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 170 babysitter
Posts: 417
Differentiating between opinion and fact doesn't marginalize that opinion in the slightest--unless you're intentionally trying to blur that distinction and represent said opinion as if it were fact, which is the mark of an intellectually dishonest person.
There you go again, labeling opinion as fact. Let me spell it out for you: undermining the TSA pilot group may have, in fact, been a purpose behind creation of GoJet. Opining that it was the SOLE purpose, however, is your mistake. That's only half the story, as I understand it.
And equally as often, there isn't a good reason at all, just a bunch of people quick to jump to conclusions and walk off a logical cliff because "all the cool kids are doing it."
There you go again, labeling opinion as fact. Let me spell it out for you: undermining the TSA pilot group may have, in fact, been a purpose behind creation of GoJet. Opining that it was the SOLE purpose, however, is your mistake. That's only half the story, as I understand it.
And equally as often, there isn't a good reason at all, just a bunch of people quick to jump to conclusions and walk off a logical cliff because "all the cool kids are doing it."
For your information I have close friends who either lost a stripe or lost a job due to the formation of GoJet so don't tell me its because of what "the cool kids are doing" Friggin insult man.
#137
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 53
(shaking head). Ok then what is the other half of the story......AS YOU UNDERSTAND IT???
For your information I have close friends who either lost a stripe or lost a job due to the formation of GoJet so don't tell me its because of what "the cool kids are doing" Friggin insult man.
For your information I have close friends who either lost a stripe or lost a job due to the formation of GoJet so don't tell me its because of what "the cool kids are doing" Friggin insult man.
I am going to give you a FACT that nobody from TSA will ever admit except a friend of mine that this happened to.
FACT furloughs that happened back in summer of 06 at TSA where ONLY, I REPEAT ONLY because of Continental flying that they did not get.
They were all told they would be back in September after the last Jetstream was to be retired.....In September they recalled everone, but 80 percent found other jobs.....
From one that was there....
#138
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Temporarily-Undowngraded-CA
Posts: 88
Interesting to vote in a union after being hired to get around our union. It was also nice of them to negotiate 50 seat pay rates, just in case ALPA pilots wouldn't do it cheap enough. Thats a nice whipsaw now, makes it hard to get a good contract when GoJet will do it for less.
#139
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 170 babysitter
Posts: 417
I am going to give you a FACT that nobody from TSA will ever admit except a friend of mine that this happened to.
FACT furloughs that happened back in summer of 06 at TSA where ONLY, I REPEAT ONLY because of Continental flying that they did not get.
They were all told they would be back in September after the last Jetstream was to be retired.....In September they recalled everone, but 80 percent found other jobs.....
From one that was there....
FACT furloughs that happened back in summer of 06 at TSA where ONLY, I REPEAT ONLY because of Continental flying that they did not get.
They were all told they would be back in September after the last Jetstream was to be retired.....In September they recalled everone, but 80 percent found other jobs.....
From one that was there....
#140
Well since we're giving everyone a history lesson... Is it not true that Go Jet was hiring while TSA was furloughing and downgrading Captains? And is it also not true that the furloughees were offered jobs at Go Jet? And not a single one of those furloughees accepted the offer? Lost Continental flying has nothing to do with the fact that Go Jet was growing while TSA had pilots on the street. I have no problem with the company operating multiple certificates, the problem is it should be and always should have been TSA pilots flying those airplanes.
As for the contract that you're so proud of... I heard the company threatened to give all the flying to Trans States pilots if Go Jet didn't accept the rates they were offering. Sort of a "reverse" whipsaw. And everyone already knows the company insisted on putting 50 seat rates in their as well. So tell us again how Go jet doesn't negatively effect the industry or TSA pilots more than any other regional?
As for the contract that you're so proud of... I heard the company threatened to give all the flying to Trans States pilots if Go Jet didn't accept the rates they were offering. Sort of a "reverse" whipsaw. And everyone already knows the company insisted on putting 50 seat rates in their as well. So tell us again how Go jet doesn't negatively effect the industry or TSA pilots more than any other regional?
I am going to give you a FACT that nobody from TSA will ever admit except a friend of mine that this happened to.
FACT furloughs that happened back in summer of 06 at TSA where ONLY, I REPEAT ONLY because of Continental flying that they did not get.
They were all told they would be back in September after the last Jetstream was to be retired.....In September they recalled everone, but 80 percent found other jobs.....
From one that was there....
FACT furloughs that happened back in summer of 06 at TSA where ONLY, I REPEAT ONLY because of Continental flying that they did not get.
They were all told they would be back in September after the last Jetstream was to be retired.....In September they recalled everone, but 80 percent found other jobs.....
From one that was there....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post