Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > GoJet
Unpolitical opinion on GoJet >

Unpolitical opinion on GoJet

Search

Notices
GoJet Regional Airline

Unpolitical opinion on GoJet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2008, 12:24 PM
  #131  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SmoothOnTop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: retired
Posts: 645
Default

backstabbing???

back in the '30s they were literally stabbing each other and cutting control cables!!
SmoothOnTop is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 12:34 PM
  #132  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 170 babysitter
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by Blackwing
Sure, I'll dissect it for you:

"First of all GoJet deserves all of the bad rap it gets." -- Opinion

"It was formed in a very underhanded way..." -- Opinion

"...continues to operate under the auspices of that backstabbing original intent." -- False; it operates under the auspices of a union-negotiated collective bargaining agreement.



This is exactly what he said:



Note that he didn't say "lower QOL", etc, he said "lower PAY RATE", and that statement is categorically false.
The bolded statement above is a painful example that you have ALOT to learn. Do a little more research into the formation of GoJet before you try to marginalize what was done by stating everything is "opinion" or "false". As stated before they went after a CBA because the management WAS so aweful.......doesn't negate the fact that they were formed for the sole purpose of undermining the Trans States pilot group. Again, do your research before you put up any more factless "opinions" yourself. We don't just pick random pilot groups to shun like the plague. There's most often a VERY good reason.
Joeshmoe is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 01:14 PM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RightSeatDude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 161
Default

All that does is make Air Wisconsin look childish and unprofessional. Radio communications aren't the place to resolve such issues. Hopefully that Air Wisconsin crew will rethink their approach.

Originally Posted by 15789
I can't think of a clearer example than what happened at ROC one day early on this winter. This involved the F'n Dirtbag air line and Air Wiskie.

ROC Tower: Air Wisconson #XXXX Follow the blue and white CRJ taking runway 24.

Air Wisconson: You mean GoJet??

ROC Tower: Afirmative.

Air Wisconson: Ok, We'll follow the scabs!


Nuf said!
RightSeatDude is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 01:15 PM
  #134  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: ERJ CA
Posts: 1,082
Default

Originally Posted by Joeshmoe
The bolded statement above is a painful example that you have ALOT to learn. Do a little more research into the formation of GoJet before you try to marginalize what was done by stating everything is "opinion" or "false".
Differentiating between opinion and fact doesn't marginalize that opinion in the slightest--unless you're intentionally trying to blur that distinction and represent said opinion as if it were fact, which is the mark of an intellectually dishonest person.

Originally Posted by Joeshmoe
As stated before they went after a CBA because the management WAS so aweful.......doesn't negate the fact that they were formed for the sole purpose of undermining the Trans States pilot group.
There you go again, labeling opinion as fact. Let me spell it out for you: undermining the TSA pilot group may or may not, in fact, have been a purpose behind creation of GoJet, and it may or may not have been the SOLE purpose. That's only half the story, as I understand it.

Originally Posted by Joeshmoe
Again, do your research before you put up any more factless "opinions" yourself. We don't just pick random pilot groups to shun like the plague. There's most often a VERY good reason.
And equally as often, there isn't a good reason at all, just a bunch of people quick to jump to conclusions and walk off a logical cliff because "all the cool kids are doing it."
Blackwing is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 01:19 PM
  #135  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 170 babysitter
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by Blackwing
Differentiating between opinion and fact doesn't marginalize that opinion in the slightest--unless you're intentionally trying to blur that distinction and represent said opinion as if it were fact, which is the mark of an intellectually dishonest person.


There you go again, labeling opinion as fact. Let me spell it out for you: undermining the TSA pilot group may have, in fact, been a purpose behind creation of GoJet. Opining that it was the SOLE purpose, however, is your mistake. That's only half the story, as I understand it.



And equally as often, there isn't a good reason at all, just a bunch of people quick to jump to conclusions and walk off a logical cliff because "all the cool kids are doing it."
(shaking head). Ok then what is the other half of the story......AS YOU UNDERSTAND IT???

For your information I have close friends who either lost a stripe or lost a job due to the formation of GoJet so don't tell me its because of what "the cool kids are doing" Friggin insult man.
Joeshmoe is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 01:20 PM
  #136  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: ERJ CA
Posts: 1,082
Default

Not gonna do your homework for you, man; the information's out there, knock yourself out.
Blackwing is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 01:31 PM
  #137  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 53
Default

Originally Posted by Joeshmoe
(shaking head). Ok then what is the other half of the story......AS YOU UNDERSTAND IT???

For your information I have close friends who either lost a stripe or lost a job due to the formation of GoJet so don't tell me its because of what "the cool kids are doing" Friggin insult man.


I am going to give you a FACT that nobody from TSA will ever admit except a friend of mine that this happened to.

FACT furloughs that happened back in summer of 06 at TSA where ONLY, I REPEAT ONLY because of Continental flying that they did not get.

They were all told they would be back in September after the last Jetstream was to be retired.....In September they recalled everone, but 80 percent found other jobs.....

From one that was there....
denramp is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 02:14 PM
  #138  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Temporarily-Undowngraded-CA
Posts: 88
Default

Originally Posted by Blackwing
"...continues to operate under the auspices of that backstabbing original intent." -- False; it operates under the auspices of a union-negotiated collective bargaining agreement.
Interesting to vote in a union after being hired to get around our union. It was also nice of them to negotiate 50 seat pay rates, just in case ALPA pilots wouldn't do it cheap enough. Thats a nice whipsaw now, makes it hard to get a good contract when GoJet will do it for less.
grossole is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 02:24 PM
  #139  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 170 babysitter
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by denramp
I am going to give you a FACT that nobody from TSA will ever admit except a friend of mine that this happened to.

FACT furloughs that happened back in summer of 06 at TSA where ONLY, I REPEAT ONLY because of Continental flying that they did not get.

They were all told they would be back in September after the last Jetstream was to be retired.....In September they recalled everone, but 80 percent found other jobs.....

From one that was there....
Fact based on heresay from a friend. Sorry but its not the reason chief.
Joeshmoe is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 02:35 PM
  #140  
Gets Weekends Off
 
exwaterski's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 328
Default

Well since we're giving everyone a history lesson... Is it not true that Go Jet was hiring while TSA was furloughing and downgrading Captains? And is it also not true that the furloughees were offered jobs at Go Jet? And not a single one of those furloughees accepted the offer? Lost Continental flying has nothing to do with the fact that Go Jet was growing while TSA had pilots on the street. I have no problem with the company operating multiple certificates, the problem is it should be and always should have been TSA pilots flying those airplanes.

As for the contract that you're so proud of... I heard the company threatened to give all the flying to Trans States pilots if Go Jet didn't accept the rates they were offering. Sort of a "reverse" whipsaw. And everyone already knows the company insisted on putting 50 seat rates in their as well. So tell us again how Go jet doesn't negatively effect the industry or TSA pilots more than any other regional?

Originally Posted by denramp
I am going to give you a FACT that nobody from TSA will ever admit except a friend of mine that this happened to.

FACT furloughs that happened back in summer of 06 at TSA where ONLY, I REPEAT ONLY because of Continental flying that they did not get.

They were all told they would be back in September after the last Jetstream was to be retired.....In September they recalled everone, but 80 percent found other jobs.....

From one that was there....
exwaterski is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SkyHigh
GoJet
179
02-09-2009 07:14 AM
soon2bfo
GoJet
22
08-22-2007 10:07 AM
naley70b
GoJet
87
08-10-2007 07:32 AM
POPA
GoJet
144
08-01-2007 12:25 PM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
3
10-14-2005 07:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices